And now Barrosa is already cracking

Putinism - it is akin to Pushkinism, because of the news associated with this science, they never become obsolete. Although, it would seem, why four days later to return to the scandal, long -commented and replaced by other, even more unheard of news. Nevertheless, Maxim Sokolov considers it necessary to share his thoughts with the reader on this subject, and he is right. For a number of reasons.

Firstly, the topic is such, burning. Still, not every day the political leader tells his interlocutor that if he wants, he will occupy the capital of the European state for two weeks, and this is what Putin said to Barrosa. Secondly, seductively in his masterful words to retell the boring statements of officials, and Columnist does not avoid the temptation. Thirdly, it’s nice to participate in the patriotic choir, the chapter of the European Commission, and the publicist stigmatizes. Fourth and the main ones, to combine Putinism with Pushkinism is the top of a professional career in our times, and M.Yu. Sokolov reaches the top. One cannot but rejoice for a colleague, and we all rejoice.

In fact, so, with the use of the Immortal Pushkin quote, in relation to the kidsian vocabulary, no one has yet defended Vladimir Vladimirovich.

“From the point of view of the language,” the leader of national oriented journalism stands up for the national leader, “there was no threat, since the use of the conditional structure just suggests that the desired event will not take place. When the baron in the“ stingy knight ”says:“ I only want to be erected, the harshrics will be erected; // My magnificent gardens // will run away with a brush in a crowd; // And they will bring a tribute to me a tribute to me, ”he does not want to say that investments are in the construction complex, as well as in nymphs and muses. On the contrary,“ I only want ”means that, possessing the potential to build the habits, take Kyiv in the military system of the etc, however, in reality of this He doesn’t want to.

It is beautifully said, isn't it? Both Pushkin and Putin - both of them are beautiful in this paragraph. As for the author, he is the best.

True, here there is a question that is not alien to Pushkinism: will the beauty be saved, which is slowly but surely moving towards disaster? At the abyss on the edge, where humanity drove the client M.Yu. Sokolova, such issues are of interest not only for literary critics, but also for completely illiterate. And here the text, published in the central newspaper, begins to play with new faces and causes a desire to clarify some theses.

Thus,the assistant to President Ushakov , and after him, the Columnist of Izvestia reproaches Barroz in chatty, oblivion of the norms of diplomatic etiquette and that he pulled out a quote from the context. The accusations are harsh, but hardly completely fair. And if you think about what happened without anger, addiction and Pushkin quotes, then Barroza can be understood.

He did not break out the content of the conversation with Putin's reporters of the newspaper La Repubblica, but shared it with his colleagues during the European Union summit, to which he had the right. And how journalists managed to find out the details of the meeting in Brussels - we have no information about that. As well as about who drains the delicate information to the workers of the house of Gabrelyanov, where M.Yu. Sokolov. In addition, President Putin with all his statements, reservations, peaceful plans and direct threats has long been such an important newsmaker that it is worth its weight in literally every word of his. But we are not stingy knights. And if Vladimir Vladimirovich, as a joke or with other purposes, reports the head of the European Commission that Kyiv is able to take in two weeks, then the indicated Barrosa is simply obliged to accurately retell this brilliant phrase to his partners. Or maybe the whole world is obliged to inform, given the situation in this world.

He is not always lying, Vladimir Putin, and not every minute jokes. Sometimes he is very serious, occasionally even true, and go guess when, communicating with him, you have to laugh, and when to believe. He said that he was not going to annex Crimea, then he assured that there were no Russian troops on the territory of the peninsula, and later it turned out that he was so trying to laugh at the interlocutors. True, Pushkin, they say, also deceived women, Benckendorf and even the king, but he did not have nuclear weapons. What, by the way, is the radical difference between Pushkinism and Putinism as a science.

In this sense, Pushkin’s poems also gain a different sound, which look so harmonious in the newspaper Aram Ashotych against the background of everything else. Yes, the baron does not need a villa in the French riviere, nor football clubs, nor yachts with winged missiles, nor high -paid nymphs - he has enough chest stuffed with treasures, over which he has a great pleasure, and daring unbearable dreams. What can not be said about our legally chosen mall. It is crowded with one seventh, in all palaces and residences, and in his geopolitical longing he will hardly be satisfied with Kiev. The KGB lieutenant colonel is wide, and there is no one to narrow.

These are rather non -frozen thoughts when reading a small Pushkin tragedy, which we were reminded of on the pages of the central newspaper. Even the finale of the play is not pleased, which in the middle of the current feast during the plague suddenly tunes in an optimistic way. However, not for long. After all, the joy is not that the villain is mortal, and the trouble is not only that he is stingy and cruel, but in those other people's wealth that he cooled. The question is, what to do to his heirs later and who will pay for everything? Pushkin? A terrible age, terrible hearts!