Humanitarians on the march

Observation of the Russian TV and other devices for the direct introduction of the correct ideas into the brain of citizens allows you to see a number of patterns. For example, the more blood, violence and destruction occurs through the fault of our state, and especially through the fault of the TV, the more words about good, peace and humanism in this TV.

On the screen are corpses and ruined cities-this is a military-humanitarian operation. The person who arranged a war in Ukraine, the Commander -in -Chief, whose subordinates are illegally fighting against the Ukrainian troops, now offers a plan by which Ukraine must withdraw its troops and actually recognize the gangster enclave on its territory. This mockery is called "the intellectually - humanitarian assistance of Putin."

Military personnel, who either under the guise of exercises were sent to fight to a neighboring country with which the war was not declared, or were recruited, as well as a criminal rabble calling itself the Cossacks - this is all on the TV called “volunteers”, that is, people of good will.

Instead of the program of Marianne Maximovskaya, the only honest program on the federal air, the REN TV program is now entering the “Dobrovir” program with the host Andrei Dobrov, the essence and purpose of which is to not lag behind the programs of the programs of Dmitry Kiselev, Vladimir Solovyov and Peter Tolstoy.

Due to the great inertiality of public consciousness, the lag of language processes from those that occur in social being, aversion to the words “good”, “humanitarian”, “volunteer”, etc. will remain for a long time after all this marshole is dissipated.

Clones and accessories

The debut of the “Dobrovir” program with the leading Andrei Dobrov, who took place on REN TV 7.09.2014, I looked entirely, trying, on the one hand, to understand whether there was at least some continuity with the murdered program of Marianne Maksimovskaya, and on the other, to see at least some differences between the program of Dobrov and similar programs going on the subbotnia and the Sunday of Prime Time on other federal channels.

According to the first observation point, they gave a sharply negative result, the program of Dobrov turned out to be a complete antipode of the Maximovskaya program. As for the differences between the new REN TV program from similar final programs on other channels, they are so insignificant that it is time to talk about cloning. “Dobrovir” is a reduced and slightly weakened copy of the “News of the Week with Dmitry Kiselev”. Dobrov has the same formulations, the same assessments, but slightly less dentist, slightly less sweeping than Kiselev. There is no radioactive ash, which Kiselev threatened to fall asleep in the United States, but Dobrov told about the “fidelity” that the United States put on Europe, implying the inclusion of the Baltic states and Poland in the NATO orbit.

But the main difference is not this. Apparently, realizing that from the point of view of content it will be difficult for him to get significant differences from other propaganda programs, Dobrov made the right decision to differ in form. No other final program takes place in the studio, which is decorated in the colors of the St. George ribbon. And Dobrov is decorated. This is time. So no one should have doubts about what views the author holds. And secondly, animation is used on Dobrovir. For example, when it came to sanctions and, in particular, about the threat of fish deficiency, a huge animated fish, accompanied by the text, arose next to the presenter: “Dobrov, help!” Smart colleagues from other channels were probably alienated by such a wonderful chip, giving enormous scope for a deep analysis of the events of the week. Just as probably everyone was aligned by the new velvet raspberry tones by the Lapserdak Vladimir Solovyov, in which the presenter dressed up on his Sunday evening.

However, about everything in order. Dobrov, of course, is worthy of praise for the search for new forms, but in the main thing, in the search for new meanings, he is far from Kiselev. The clone is far from the original. In Sunday Vesti of 7.09, Kiselev managed to drive into the consciousness of compatriots a few more grains of truth processed to complete fossil. “There is no more army of Ukraine!”, - this slogan hanging on the backdack's backdack, Kiselev declared at least 10 times. Looking ahead, I’ll say that in Solovyov’s program this fact was thoroughly disassembled and proved irrefutably. True, when in both programs, immediately after the reports that “the army of Ukraine is no more”, it followed that “the Ukrainian security forces violated the ceasefire and firing the peaceful tanks of the militias”, that when these two messages went one after another, some kind of discomfort arose, some inconsistency. But all these trifles retreated before the convincing of the leading and incontrovertibility of evidence.

Last week was the time when the well -known facts that Russian military are fighting with the Ukrainian army, these facts, evidence of which the Internet overwhelmed, solemnly entered the federal broadcast and were formalized in a slender and beautiful concept within the framework of the Russian world. Kiselev in “Vesti” explained that all these “Motorols”, “Abwehers” and “Demons” are not criminals by which 359 the article of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation simply sobs, but modern transit and Oslyabi, who were also volunteers. Since the valiant monks lived and died a long time ago, Kiselev decided to reinforce the myth of heroic Novoros volunteers with a more fresh historical series and enlisted the authority of I. V. Stalin, who sent thousands of volunteers to Spain, which he later awarded. The humanitarian authority of Stalin Kiselev seemed sufficient and he did not give other evidence of the justification that our military are fighting in the territory of another country against the legally elected government. “They defend their historical homeland, which is wider than political borders, ” Kiselev completed the plot of the traditions of volunteering in Russia with such a deep thought, leaving all the peoples of the world shaking from fear that someone from the heirs of Peresvet’s traditions and waspidation will emerge in historical memory that his historical homeland is within the country that this or that people, due to misunderstanding, considers its own.

Those who are trying to figure out why the Motherland, who sent their soldiers to fight to the territory of another country, states that she, the Motherland, did not send them anywhere, and these non -meta died during the explosion of household gas, Kiselev seized the expenses of “Sweaststone necrophils”. It was such a poster that hung on the backdrop in the Vesti Studio, when Kiselev spoke about a bunch of renegades who interviewed the surviving Pskov paratroopers, the widows of the dead, photographed the graves from which the names were mysteriously a mysteriously disappeared. So that no one had a doubt who these “voluptuous necrophils” are, the logo of the Rain TV channel hung next to the poster in the studio.

Although in fairness he would have to hang the logos of the first national channel of Ukraine, the Schuster Live and portraits of the leading Savik Schuster and the Pskov Yobrenikhnik Lev Schlosberg, since the whole story with the dead and secretly buried Pskov paratroopers was investigated precisely by Schlosberg and shown to all Ukraine by Savikom. Shuster in his author's program.

For years, Russian television channels poured the products of Solovyov, Kiselev, Mamontov and Co. into the consciousness of Ukrainians. Some of the citizens of Ukraine were poisoned, the result of which the war was. I believe that if for at least one month the Russians had the opportunity to watch Schuster Live, then by the end of this month the war would not have been. Schuster is not an icon of journalism. He, like all representatives of our sinful workshop, loves popularity and strives for professional success. It is easy to catch him on a “game on some gate” that Ukrainian colleagues do regularly. But the difference between deviations from what can be considered the norm in journalism by Schuster, and the same Solovyov is about the same as the difference between a runny nose and AIDS in an incurable stage.

The Schuster Live program, in which the entire Studio Studio applauded Lev Schlosberg, after he spoke from the hospital bed about his investigation of the death of the Pskov paratroopers, this program was remembered by another episode that is very characteristic of the Schuster style. Can you imagine on the air of Solovyov a 20-minute performance by Harry Kasparov or Boris Nemtsov? Even a 5-minute? Fiction, isn't it? So, before Schlosberg, the whole studio and with it is the whole of Ukraine, since Schuster Live is one of the most rated programs, looked and listened to Nestor Shufrich, a deputy from the Party of Regions, the faithful ally of Yanukovych, and a former Minister of the Government of the Fully President. His performance lasted 22 (twenty -two!) Minutes. They listened carefully, practically without interrupting, although the camera showed their faces, and it was clear that it was difficult for some politicians and experts to restrain themselves, since they had a war in the country, and this was the enemy and not only political. The attitude to his performance was evident on the scoreboard on which the numbers of support appeared what the speaker says. When Lev Schlosberg spoke, the scoreboard showed 99% of support. Support for the words of Shufrich ranged from 8 to 13 percent. But he had 22 minutes of live broadcast to explain his political position to Ukraine.

Returning to the "Sunday Vesti" with Dmitry Kiselev, I can not pass by an important political science discovery made in this program. The fact is that the last six months in the Russian political dictionary there have been strange transformations with the word "fascism". Its volume and scope of application were somehow painfully swollen, and the content of this concept became vanishingly small, actually equal to zero, so no one could understand what this word means, but everyone easily called each other the Nazis. And in the "Vesti" from 7.09 the word fascism has gained its new and, apparently, final meaning. In a report on how children in Ukraine met on September 1, the journalist of Russia-1 discovered a terrible one. In one of the schools, children were recommended to come to the first lesson in embroidered shirts. “It smells of fascism!”, One of the parents rattled in the studio of Dmitry Kiselev. At the same time, Kiselev put his eyes significantly. Now we will finally know what fascism is. This is an embroidery, and not at all what we used to think.

The entirely engaged in the search for fascism in a neighboring state, the federal channels somehow lost control of what was happening in Russia. No, of course we have no fascism, but it would be worth paying attention to the slight forms of nationalism. Recently, the newspaper of the administration of the city of Irkutsk, which is called, “Irkutsk, with a circulation of 15 thousand copies distributed the following important information signed by a citizen Gushchina I.A.:“ I am sure that Khokhlov, as they say, should be urinated everywhere, not only in New Russia. At the same time, Ukrainian Matsenko is eager for the city of Irkutsk. I think that we Russian people should not allow it. The deputy can only be Russian and no one else. ” The end of the quote.

Fifteen years of the total stripping of the journalistic field from conscience and reason led to the fact that the above -based statements can publish, and the editor considers it possible to sign this “in print and light”. And not only in the most circulation newspaper of distant Irkutsk. Here is the Moscow Komsomolets, whose editor Pavel Gusev occupies almost all possible leadership positions in Russian journalism. In the MK issue from 7.09, an article was released under the heading "Artem Chechikov died at the airport due to a pilot's reservation." The well-known tragedy, the death of a young guy because of the stupidity and vile slaveness of our doctors and employees of Sheremetyev, it turns out, has a completely patriotic dimension. The reason, as it turned out, is not that the dispatcher could not immediately cause help, the doctors as usual was not in a hurry, the airport’s services, as usual, kept the gates for a long time, and all this abomination stretched for two hours, which ruined the person. Pavel Gusev and his subtle political label, the employees correctly caught the trend and made the exact conclusion: the pilot is to blame for everything, who, having demanded (and achieved!) Emergency landing to help a person with a heart attack, asked, it turns out, “not that ambulance”. True, Pavel Nikolaevich, all evil only from non -Russian ones, can a Russian man cause evil to the Russian man.

Disputes about the correct interpretation of Putin's plan

If on Ukrainian television channels, with all their shortcomings, there are constantly different points of view, including diametrically opposite, then the range of opinions on federal Russian channels is limited by disputes about how to correctly understand Putin’s ingenious plan, as well as when the US collapse and the entire Western world - simultaneously with Ukraine or still a little later.

“Sunday evening” of 7.09, the one on which Vladimir Solovyov debuted in the raspberry velvet lapcerdake, of course, opened Mr. J., who immediately stated that by the New Year the militias would be in Kyiv. The deadlines for the capture of Kyiv and the fall of the junta, which are appointed in the programs of Russian television channels, are constantly shifted. In February, it was said that in May the presidential elections would not take place, then that the junta would not survive summer, in the spring the fall was scheduled for the fall, now they are already pulling before the New Year. This issues in Russian politicians such as J. Very Soviet people, with their optional and familiar to long -term construction.

Then they began to discuss NATO, which insidiously sneaking to our borders. The best answer was invented by Senator Tarlo, who, firstly, proposed to transfer the capital to Krasnoyarsk, and secondly, to disperse all the authorities so that the insidious enemy could not catch deputies, senators and ministers who will snoop back and forth around the country. Everyone seemed to like this idea, which made a very clear value structure in the heads of the audience. Namely, the fact that the few that should be protected in this country are deputies, ministers, senators, as well as experts serving them, and all other contents of the homeland, including 140 million citizens and their habitat, can be sacrificed.

I believe that citizens, including, of course, and the author of these lines, earned such an attitude, because they allowed Senator Tarlo and the like, from which Senator Tarlo is only a tendency to frankly say what he thinks, and some simple -mindedness.

Since we were talking about NATO's intrigues, military experts began to speak out, and the first of them was taken by the poet and publicist Oles Buzin, who said that the army of Novorossia could not be disarmed, and the Ukrainian army was defeated and lost about 5 thousand people killed. This figure caused such indignation among the co -chair of the People’s Front of Novorossia Vladimir Rogov, which for a second was scared for the poet Buzin. The fact is that the horns are a very multifaceted person, in addition to the co -chair of the Popular Front, also the leader of the Slavic Guard, and leads both the front and the guard, apparently, directly from the Ostankino’s different studios, in which he spends the last few months without a break.

So Rogov said that the Ukrainian army lost not some 5 thousand, but as many as 47 thousand people. Rogov called the figure up to one murdered, but he spoke so quickly that I did not have time to record. Soloviev, like me, was surprised by such accuracy, and he asked Rogov about where such data came from. And then Rogov opened the veil over the secret of the military successes of New Russia. It turns out that all the generals of the General Staff of Ukraine are terribly afraid of ships in Slavyansk, who promised them Rogov. And in order to earn the messages from Rogov, they, these generals, vying to Rogov’s all the information known to them. At first, I heard the figure of 47 thousand losses, climbed on the Internet and saw that in the spring the number of ground forces of Ukraine, according to the acting Minister of Defense of Ukraine Igor Tenyukh, amounted to 40 thousand, and in total a group of 50 thousand participated in the ATO. So, having lost 47 thousand, the Ukrainian army now represents either a negative or negligible small size. But you cannot argue with the person who intimidated the entire General Staff of Ukraine.

Meanwhile, a serious discussion ensued in the studio. Its causative agent was the most harmless of those present, Leonid Polyakov, member of the Presidential Council for Human Rights, Head. Department of Political Science of the Higher School of Economics. Polyakov tried in every possible way to show those present that he was his own. When it came to the intrigues of NATO, he said that Ukraine is falling apart, and what kind of pieces to crawl to NATO, he, Poles are difficult to say. Then the presidential human rights activist decided to joke. He said that the ATO had one letter sawn down. Since no one laughed, Polyakov decided to explain the joke, saying that if the letter “n” from NATO will get an ATO. In my opinion, Polyakov did not understand that the right to joke in Solovyov’s studio, as, indeed, in any other state-owned institution, should be earned.

And then Polyakov made a mistake. Он стал говорить о том, в чем он, по его ошибочному мнению, разбирается профессионально. Он стал говорить, что надо показать «мягкую силу», бороться за Малороссию и утверждать во всем Русском мире консервативные, а не либеральные ценности. Не знаю, в чем причина, возможн, в том, что у Полякова, несмотря на вполне мракобесные взгляды, довольно интеллигентное лицо с чеховской бородкой. Но топтали этого интеллигента всей студией, примерно, как Висисуалия Лоханкина били всей коммуналкой за невыключенный в уборной свет. Пушков обвинил его в том, что Высшую школу экономики завоевали американские ценности. Господин Ж. сказал, что надо выявлять студентов, зараженных этой идеологией. А Соловьев объснил, что вся пресловутая «мягкая сила» сводится к банальному подкупу элит, и это и есть борьба ценностей.

Есть расхожее мнение, что телевизор не для умных. Сравнивая украинское и российское ТВ этот тезис, естественно, не опровергнешь. Но становится очевидно, что, если украинский телевизор позволяет хотя бы отличить умного популиста от глупого, дает людям сделать осознанный выбор, то телевизор российский, во-первых, не предоставляет никакого выбора, а, во-вторых, понижает планку любой дискуссии до уровня самого глупого ее участника.



Photos of ITAR-TASS and Hedgehog