Hybrid justice

"This was not the case under the Soviet regime." The times of Late Putin are often described by this phrase, and there are many reasons, as it might seem. Hybrid war, medieval scrapers in half with gabier spirituality, the flying president - in fact, which of our kings flew with the Siberlasts? Even Comrade Stalin did not proudly read compatriots, black lightning like, and did not dive into the darkness of the sea behind amphoras, although the person was almost omnipotent. However, modest in everyday life.

On the other hand, if you dig the topic deeper, it will soon become clear that the blind faith is the uniqueness of the current era - it is from pride. There were worse times, and more impudent, and senile, and victorious over Russia extended the owl wings, and the highest hierarchs wore general epaulets under the cassocks, and the kings came across oddities, take even Pavel or Nikita Sergeych. Analogs are generally sought if you dig or just rummage in memory.

Nevertheless, something incomprehensible in the air is clearly present, but this manifests itself in trifles. Take the same hybrid war in Ukraine, in which regular Russian troops and gangs are involved. Previously, this was also called "fraternal help", but the authorities somehow did without the "militias" in the field, and the so-called gumkondoi did not break through with tanks across the borders of Hungary, Czechoslovakia or Afghanistan. Russia was a party in the conflict, and it never occurred to anyone to hide it, and all our thunders, how many of them were, did not show the deepest concern for the neighboring people . They took care of, of course, but in moderation.

Despite the fact that the Soviet Union, according to the joke, also with whom he wanted, bordered and was a bit to any changes in the geopolitical landscape. That is, they always lied and inspired, justifying any invasion of a foreign country, but they did not play hide and seek with an ideological enemy and did not indulge in partisan. Somehow they were held.

The enemies were destroyed or captured - both in Budapest, and in Prague, and in Kandahar, and quietly performed a court or lynch over them. However, there was never such a thing that an enemy soldier is taken somewhere to Voronezh, and then to Moscow and there tried to denounce the native Criminal Code according to various articles. Unless politicians or foreign agent Wallenberg. Unless the Germans and their various accomplices were judged and, it happened, hung or sent to the camps, well, so they were invaders or traitors. The affairs of the Afghan Mujahideen were not studied in the Basmanny Court of Moscow with a large combination of journalists. The Soviet authorities generally tried to remind the people more often about Afghanistan, and this was a wise decision.

The uniqueness of the case of Nadezhda Savchenko was that for some reason for some reason in Voronezh, and then in the capital a foreign citizen, stolen in their homeland, is judged. They judge the pilot, captured, whose main fault is that she fought with the invaders. They judge, deliberately attracting the attention of the whole world to the war that is rightly called hybrid. In other words, shameful. As a war, the occupation and as a provoked civil war, with the participation of Russian instructors, lost the vacationers-spaces and local Vlasov units.

It really never happened.

And then the plot develops according to traditional examples in which modern Markin and psychiatric hospitals for the unbending political zyes of the Andropov era are screaming. However, the times in the yard are again different, which is the desire to put the court into a closed regime and conduct an examination contrary to the desire of the abducted and its lawyers leads to a scandal, which was unthinkable under Brezhnev. Then, after all, few people knew about prisoners of conscience and on TV they were not broadcast, and Nadezhda Savchenko saw everything , and the diagnosis was already made, and the verdict seems obvious. There is a gloomy criminal record, and the time will come when they will judge her abductors, investigators, and prosecutors, and judges. Although, of course, you should not put pressure on the coming court.

And all the most striking arguments that the SK employees bring to send Savchenko for compulsory treatment. The investigator, imagine, "had doubts about Savchenko’s sanity, since she committed an exceptionally cruel crime." There is not the slightest evidence, but the employee is already so shocked by the sight of her atrocities that he turns to the doctors for help. And even if it is assumed that the UK is just time by order from above, as long as they decide in the Kremlin, to exchange the prisoner under the Minsk agreements or to hold it hostage and torment it, the situation is still completely unthinkable. Unprecedented, yes, no matter how much the historical textbooks are leaf through.

Another meeting on the complaint of Nadezhda Savchenko to investigators with their mental problems was transferred to October 13 - and this means that its unprecedented case continues in the same mode. And then everything is possible. A sudden turn in the process makes with pain and anxiety to think that the use of psychotropic substances in Russian prisons is not a matter of a few. Although, by common thought, you recall that the fate of the captive is concerned not only of the whole of Ukraine, but also the leaders of the Western states, and this until some extent serves as a protection from the rooted madness of the Russian government. This encourages, and another famous phrase - “never happened, and here again” - also seems not quite applicable to current circumstances. The torture justice will pass it, and Savchenko will go out into the will in the foreseeable time. Putin flew, and God himself ordered her.