Three years and a month for sucking

In the Zamoskovoretsky district court - small messengers and narrow corridors. The corridor on the fourth floor is gradually filled with those who wish to listen to the verdict to Alexei Sutuga - for the media and the Center "E", "Leader of Antifa".

Sergey Udaltsov “for Bolotnaya” was planted when he no longer posed any threat to the Kremlin, when there was no mountain ash on the crest, on the crest of which he was. So the “leader of Antifa” was planted, when the antifa is, to put it mildly, in a frozen state-due to a serious decline in the activity of his opponents, the Nazis.

Well, of course, Donbass did not pass without a trace even for Antif. For example (running ahead), the Sutuga’s sentence listened in a T -shirt with the symbols of fans of the Kyiv football club Arsenal, which is supported by local anti -fascists. In the summer, several fans of Arsenal signed up volunteers in the ATO and went to the front, their comrades help them in every way. But the Moscow Antifa Anton Fatulaev, who received authority in his midst after he served for the stabbing with the ultra -right, went to fight on another front line and died in the Luhansk region. The problem of “Bandera and quilted jackets” most antifa is now interested in much more than the intrigues of Alexander Potkin and Dmitry Demushkin. Another big question is whether it is possible now to talk about Antif as a single community.

Planting that Udaltsov, that the stoops are not the “act of self -defense” of the police state. This is simply unwillingness to stop the repressive mechanism when it is already launched.

The sister and father of Alexei Sutuga, the always intercessor of the Politzecov Vladimir Akimenkov and a dozen two associates of the souquet and journalists - mostly sympathizers came to the verdict. When the defendant was taken to the hall, everyone applauded him. The white ravens were full -bodied journalist and NTV operator, whom the audience united in response to requests to comments.

The verdict was unexpectedly appointed on Tuesday, although on Monday there was the last word of the accused. The hope was warm that the verdict was not written in advance, but the case would be sent for a subsequence - where he was the road.

But the judge was a half -stopped by the verdict, condemning the sutu in the second part of Article 213 of the Criminal Code - hooliganism by a group of persons by prior conspiracy.

According to the stoop, the events of January 2, 2014 developed as follows: he ended up in the company of young people - he did not name their names and claims that he met them by chance, they entered the Sbarro cafe near the Oktyabrskaya metro station. There, this company got a fight with a company of nationalists in the same cafe. Sutuga tried to separate the fighters and even admitted that he hit someone in the process of pulling.

Judging by the verdict, Sutuga was an active participant in the attack on nationalists. He struck several stools, a dozen strokes and almost the same amount - a home -made hammer . One of the victims testified about the hammer that Sutug was operating on them, and the second - that it could not say. The court believed the first.

Two dozen strokes allegedly inflicted by sucking (a man weighing 100 kilograms, worked as a loader, a builder, a guard, was engaged in rugby and martial arts), and yet other antifa was also beaten - and the victims only had a few abrasions, which even the consequence characterized as beatings, not bodily injuries.

The court was not interested in this situation - even given that the roles of victims and witnesses are distributed between the nationalists in the case, there is no video of a fight in a cafe in the center of Moscow in the case, there were no unbiased witnesses of a fight.

The stooper looks the same big man as before planting, but a sharp painful cough gives out the inhabitant of the Butyrki. He looked with contempt at the judge and with warmth - in the hall, at familiar and not very faces.

The judge, of course, took into account that the souquet of a three -year -old son, for criminal liability, is brought to the first time and he has positive characteristics. And she appointed three years and one month in prison instead of four years and two months, as the prosecutor asked.

The judge in the process was Elena Korobchenko. The next political verdict that she has to bear is in the case of the Navalny brothers and "Yves Rocher."