Your letters. November 8, 2014

“You are not interested in anything,” David Sitkilov blames me, “except as it can be faster to lift to America and humbled Russia as dirty against the backdrop of the conflict in Ukraine. I would send you out of the country for inciting interethnic growth. You read only letters corresponding to your view. You should be ashamed! But for a certain amount, I think you could say not such things. ”

Everything is easier, David. People, tuned like you, almost do not write to us. There is nothing to read out if you use your word. We need to think about what is the matter. In the meantime, the next letter. Your like -minded person sent him, if I am not mistaken. I read: “How long have you, A.I. shot, have become such a lawyer when you put forward claims to Russia about Crimea? Maybe you demanded compliance with the rule of law when you overthrew the legal president in the form of V.F. Yanukovych? Who do you want to cherish, A.I. shot? Let me remind you, A.I. Shot, to translate the speech in the direction “Legal-Nazonno” after the illegal overthrow of the legal authorities in Ukraine simply went and stupid. It’s like if an alcoholic becomes scolding someone for drunkenness. Is there a conscience, A.I. shot? People in Crimea have exactly the same rights as those, amiable for you, citizens who overthrew legal power in Kyiv. These people in Crimea legally decided to decide their fate themselves, that is, showed their will to self -determination. And they chose the country that they like more, that is, Russia. So understandable? The lawyer of the hell, ”this is how the letter ends.

There is an opinion that you can talk with such people. I read something like the instructions on this score: “Carefully listen to your interlocutor, calmly start asking oncoming questions, most answers to which Russians do not know ... Why did you get that there was an illegal state coup in Ukraine? Remember how then President Yanukovych disappeared. On the twenty -first of February, Yanukovych, hastily taking away all his things from the residence in the Mezhigorye, unexpectedly disappeared in an unknown direction, which was documented on the video ... View video: paintings, cabinets, chandeliers do not take with them on a working business trip. The Verkhovna Rada, in connection with the shooting of the head of state and “self -removal of it from the fulfillment of constitutional powers,” the constitutional majority of votes removed him from his post ... Thus, the foundation of the Russian image of fascism in Ukraine is destroyed on the root of the root: there is no overthrow of Yanukovych Euromaidan, there is no “illegitimate power” against which the Crimea and the east of Ukraine allegedly rebelled. ”

The author of these lines thinks that you can really convince my cursing. Oh, I don’t know ... This scouring, by the way, is the most faithful of the listeners of “Freedom”. Sometimes you say something and immediately forget, and he remembers your every word for years. When asked why such people listen to us, the deceased writer Vladimir Soloukhin, “Volodymyr Soloukhin, the guy with an orzhone,” as they said about him in the same epigram answered more frankly. He was famous for his launching a native of the Vladimir region. When asked why he listens to “freedom”, he replied: “For bitterness”.

The Muscovite writes: “The husband arrived, was in the sanatorium. I met there with a wonderful uncle. Eighty-five years, a retired submarine engineer, I will not reproduce the rank of order, and a colonel on the ground. The acting actively and sincerely. Member of the Central Committee of the current Communist Party of Russia. He is in a group that is against Zyuganov. They dream of throwing him off as an opportunist, but it doesn’t work. The Kremlin supports dad Zu. Here, Anatoly Ivanovich. In the party, intrigues, and you say, ” - this is how this little letter ends. That's why she and the party, so that there are intrigues in it. Where it smells of power, money, glory, there is always a struggle for these joys of life. In the Ukrainian Communist Party, it seems to be over - along with the party itself, otherwise it does not happen.

The beginning of the next letter should be liked by that “uncle”, which was mentioned in the previous one. I read: “In Moscow propaganda, the labels of Soviet propaganda are used: Bandera, Nazis, Nazis, Hunt, but from the standpoint of Togo, Soviet, all the figures of present -day Russia are traitors of socialism, class enemies are bourgeois, and even criminal. And Valka-Polstakan, and all the deputies of the bourgeois Duma, and the consistent-opodetunist-revisionist of 3 yugans, and in general the whole top. They are all millionaires or billionaires, and according to their speeches, one can think that selfless Bolsheviks. The population has already been divided into those brought up in the USSR, and the youth who dreamed of becoming not astronauts and polar explorers, but killers and confans. And then they said abusive words: junta, Bandera, punishers. They reacted no worse than scoops, even more evil. Like a flock of dogs. So what is the reason: in training or in an innate reflex? ”, The author of this letter is asking this question. Of course, the reason for training is the training of their parents, who handed over to children the main thing of what was learned unnoticed by themselves. The main thing only is absorbed, it is the simplest, affordable. What could be easier, how to think that we are the rest of the world, we are not in it and not with it, we are on a special woman, but he is against us. We are best, only our faith is correct, we will defeat everyone, bring into consciousness, in senses - into our consciousness, in our feeling. For this youth, it doesn’t matter what the words “Kiev junta” mean - it is important that these words mean enemies, mean evil, and it is important that the team entered these enemies, on this evil.

Listen. “We are zombie not only a box. A book flow also contributes to his contribution. The genre of books about “Pogatyans” is extremely popular - that is, like a person falls into the past and extends an alternative story (or in one of the options as many as two special forces brigades). These opuses have been printed for fifteen years. In the vast majority of cases, this is wretched graphomania. However, what is interesting: looking through them, I have not found one yet where they tried to "establish democracy." All are permeated with primitive patriotism. For example, they meet our emperor, after the victory over Japan in one thousand nine hundred and fourth. On the stage - Chaliapin, a choir is built behind him with trellises. And in front of them - the Queen of Heaven! - Rachmaninov ... He waves a wand, and ...

For all centuries with great things

The king was glorified by his Russian people!

Over the world, our banner is proudly cut,

He calls us to a bright life!

And so on. So the Russian printed word, and not just the screen, makes or tries to make idiots from Russian people, ”concludes the author of the letter, a person with a research vein. He is not surprised that most of today's residents of Russia are sure that in one thousand nine hundred and fourth year, Russia inflicted Japan with such a defeat that it has not yet recovered. By the way, during that war, the people said that this was a war between macaques and some. The Japanese were called the Makaki, some kind of themselves. Now, if we were not somehow, we would have conquered all Makak. Say that now another opinion prevails, another desire and another sadness? The main thing is to conquer everyone or at least charm, which, in general, is the same. But it doesn’t work out, because somehow, that’s sadness.

The priest writes, archimandrite ... Russian priests signed something. I read: “Dear Anatoly Ivanovich, I ask you to announce my appeal to humanity. It is necessary that people cease to behave like today, when everyone considers himself the center of the universe, and all other people - something secondary. It is necessary to give a new life to traditional communities - family, community, the state making people from the population. And it is necessary that the interests of the community would always be valued higher than the interests of the individual, and not only from the point of view of the law. It is necessary that every individual sincerely considers his rights less significant than the interests of the community. And yet - it is necessary that the general opinion is that the responsibilities of a person are above his rights. Is it achievable? It is difficult to say, but it is clear that only those peoples that will follow this difficult path will ultimately survive. And now, dear Anatoly Ivanovich, I admit that I played you. You did not read my appeal to humanity, but Boris Viktorovich Raushenbakh, an academician who died in two thousand first year after eighty -five years of a very difficult life. He was a large mathematician, was engaged in missile and space affairs, at the end he was carried away by theology, proved that the doctrine of the Trinity fits into mathematical ideas ... How can we comment on his frankly anti-liberal position: duties above rights? This is the diametrical opposite of what the Radio “Freedom” preaches. This is directed against the secular faith that the West lives, isn't it? You will not be interested in my name, like the place of my ministry, ”writes Archimandrite.

Thanks for the letter, Father. An unkind attitude to trade, entrepreneurship, to worries, attempts, the adventures of capital, to everything related to money is the general weakness of most thinkers of the past. So many slopes were poured here, and moreover, from a pure heart that if the Lord took into account the mood of the best friends of mankind, he would have strangled capitalism in the germ itself, and people would still move on lively traction and would have died like flies. What did the strongest Russian minds see in French revolutions? The main thing that these revolutions flashed against, in those days people knew better than today. Against privileges, if it is extremely short and simple - there were those revolutions against privileges. So, by the way, the essence of the Ukrainian revolutions - the last and the penultimate, orange can be designated. Down with thieves and gangster privileges! In the days of the French revolutions - Down with feudal privileges! And what does Tyutchev, for example, say about these revolutions, and followed by Chaadaev? What upset them? But what: “The autocracy of the human“ I ”, the rise of personality, the exaltation of human rights. They see in the germ itself that gradually, but quite quickly, in some one and a half years, will develop and cause great alarm at Raushenbach at the very end of the twentieth century. The mysterious thing is actually a thing. The personality has not yet had time to rise properly - I did not have time to rise even in the most free countries, but they already want it - and the best people want! - Beford. And what is truly surprising: all the time she rose, the best people, watching her staggering, jerking, how her knees were bent, condemned her for these efforts, noticed only bad, ugly, all stomp around her, confused her, scared her, persuaded her to return to the authorities, to the authorities, and the authorities? How to understand this? Only about costs, only about the ugliness of a straightening personality - only languages are being scratched with the greatest hunting and with a genuine feeling! Walking out. I read:

“They say about eighty -five percent, which approve of everything. And they live in their neighborhoods and do not think about any Ukraine. Pahana is supported by several thousand psychos and criminals. Out of one hundred and forty million. And they went to Safari. On the Office. The rest will live like this with Lyokh Navalny. These are already free people. People of the era of humanism and universal education. The worst thing is in our time that there is nothing to fight for. The fashion will pass on the priests, because there are no religious people, fashion is fashion. Today is mini, and tomorrow is maxi. Today is a pipe, a cost. They will not need Shakespeares. Even the Soviet bard Makarevich they no longer need. Too cute. Equally, it is necessary, zoologic. History fought all its history at its end. For Putin or Lyokh, it is not so important. For a cute singer with a beard or behind a growling pepper with breasts or tail in feathers. We happened to live to the end of the story. ” The author of this letter sees representatives of Lyubimov and Vysotsky’s “microdistricts”: “Vysotsky could not understand who the prince is,” he writes. “This is not a rebellious burger.” The prince is the heir to the throne. He has power. But the prince’s power implies responsibility. Hamlet does not so much take revenge for dad (as Vysotsky thought), as much as Denmark saves. The fact is that according to the medieval ideas, which the trace was caught, the usurpator Claudius will destroy it. Claudius illegally entered the throne, he is a traitor to the king, with such a monarch, Denmark will die. The main goal of Hamlet is to save Denmark. And he does it at the cost of his own life. Prince Fortinbraus enters the throne. Although he is a foreigner, but at the same time a noble, aristocrat, who did not tarnish himself. On medieval mores, this is normal. The recently deceased Lyubimov and Vysotsky were not monarchists. The artist mixed up the monologues "to be or not to be" and "The mouth is torn, I will dig up the morgores!" The estimated prince is absurd. Vysotsky could not get used to this image, because the prince is not a mental opera. And the prince killed the blatar. But after all, the prince was also a strangler of freedom, he would press it in the same way as a vile uncle. ” Here I break this letter - a letter for read people (sometimes they need such - I'm not talking about people, but about letters on the Radio "Freedom"). I would like to say that the very presence of a person who thinks about such things as Hamlet’s tragedy and Vysotsky’s fate shows that it is still far from the end of history. We hurry, we are in a hurry with conclusions. So we talked about the unfortunate haste with which people of a high culture evaluated the first steps of a rising personality. Not having time to find such a wonderful word as the “independence” of the personality, they began to crush about the “autocracy” of the personality. They were too impressionable. It will push away from life-from some case, from some kind of scumbag, to which no one and nothing is a decree-and went to talk about the dangers of freedom, abolition of ranks, all and all sorts of bastards. The point, in my opinion, is that these are the best people, people of high, selected culture, and culture is old! The new, democratic, bourgeois, as it was later dubbed, the culture before their eyes took the first steps: ugly, clumsy, stumbled out of the blue. The old, polished, bold culture with disgust was ducked out. Such a great thing as a person’s rise, it is terribly contradictory. All the personalities are raised, not only the best, but at first even the worst in the first place, all sorts of detachments, scum, marginals declare itself. All the most awkward, shameless, proud pops upstairs ... Everything is staggering, dust does not settled, the husk is not answered from the grain. The best, sensitive, vulnerable people are the first to respond to all costs, it is so unpleasant, it hurts that they turn off common sense - even people of a great mind.

Sergei Zenkin writes about such a sad event as the statements of Sophia Gubaidullina living in Germany. She suffers from the fact that Ukraine, according to her, “proposed itself, its state as a place for a new world war”, that it, this country, set its goal - literally - "to destroy all Russians, communists, all Jews." “Just do not answer me,” writes Zenkin, “that this is a brilliant, elderly, busy, living far and in itself. The person is really brilliant, but the mechanism of non -critical perception - when the source of information is generally forgotten - is completely the same as that of the usual pensioner at the TV. And at the same time again: yes, the great composer, the pride of Russia, and speaks wonderful about music. And it does not save from anything, ”writes Mr. Zenkin. True, he does not save anything from anything, and first of all - from the belief that since you are revered as an artist, you simply must bring your opinions to the grateful public not only in this case about music, but about everything in the world. But we ask ourselves this question: would Mrs. Gubaidullina believe that not Ukraine put to destroy all Russians, Communists and Jews, but, for example, England or Denmark? I think no, I would not believe it. What does it mean? And the fact that she all her long life admitted that Ukraine is capable of such villains. Before us is a person who has long been treated with classical Soviet propaganda, horror stories about Bandera. Once again it turns out that you can be a brilliant writer of something and at the same time-an ordinary part of the crowd, a drop, as a great proletarian poet put it. "A drop to pour with the masses."

Here they write about another one - he, however, is not a genius, just a poet who wrote a dozen good poems, some of them became songs, he is a natural scientist in the main profession. Mr. Timofeev struck his public statement about Russian-Ukrainian affairs-what else? This is the statement: “If one drunk Secretary General and the second drunk can give the Crimea at first by their personal order (he didn’t even have in the drunken brain that it would someday leave Russia), and the second simply makes the fate of the peoples in the Belovezhskaya Pushcha, and puts them in a tragic subsequent situation, then this must be sorted out, what and how”. What is it, Anatoly Ivanovich? - He asks first of all, and then Mr. Timofeev. - The chatter of an irresponsible person with an imperial confusion in his head and a dummy in the shower? You correctly noticed in one of your programs that these people seem to forget that there are sources that you can contact at any time to check, clarify this or that information, get knowledge of a subject. ”

Thanks for the letter, Mr. Timofeev, for understanding ... Yes, they, such people, for themselves - the source of all information about everything. Сам себе библиотека. Тут ещё и склонность к красному словцу, нюх на красное словцо, на хлёсткое словцо: пьяный генсек… Не имеет значения, что Хрущёв не был генсеком, что пьянство даже Ельцина не играло никакой роли в Беловежской пуще, а Хрущёв по сравнению с ним - просто трезвенник. Главное – сильно сказануть.

«Анатолий Иванович, - следующее письмо, - исполняется примерно восемь месяцев с аннексии Крыма и начала заварухи на Востоке Украины. Уместно вспомнить одно стихотворение Тютчева». В письме оно приводится полностью, я прочитаю несколько строк.

Осьмой уж месяц длятся эти битвы;
Геройский пыл, предательство и ложь,
Притон разбойничий в дому молитвы,
В одной руке распятие и нож.

Речь идёт о польском восстании тысяча восемьсот шестьдесят третьего года. Поляков Тютчев называет мертвецами, которые восстали, чтобы Россия их опять похоронила. Да, в его глазах они мертвецы и предатели, для которых ничего святого – их священники в костёлах призывают к вооружённой борьбе. Россию осудили Великобритания, Австрия, Голландия, Дания, Испания, Португалия, Италия, Ватикан, Швеция, Османская империя. Имея это в виду, поэт говорит, что «целый мир, как опьяненный ложью», обрушил на Россию «все виды зла, все ухищренья зла!». Таких нападок на неё, пишет он, «мир не видал с первоначальных дней», а свидетельствует сие о том, что «велико, знать, о Русь, твое значенье!». Многим в России, не одному Тютчеву, действительно казалось, что весь мир только о них и думает и против них злоумышляет, против них, с которыми правда и Бог, ведь они хотят всего-навсего раз и навсегда усмирить буйную Варшаву, второй раз похоронить восставших мертвецов, которые пока что называют себя поляками. В похожем состоянии духа русское большинство и сегодня. Наш слушатель себя к нему не относит, более того, он насмехается над ним, над этим большинством, над его страхами, обидами, самомнением. Читаю: «На нас, бедных, обрушились сразу все - американские империалисты и германские фашисты, большевики и кайзер Вильгельм (украли победу в Первой мировой войне), польские уланы и наполеоновские маршалы, Карл и Мазепа, бандеровцы и правосеки. Вместе с современными пиндосами, гейропейцами и правосеками все мертвецы поднялись на нас из могил! Бывший помощник Собчака воюет сразу со всеми супостатами из близкого и далёкого прошлого. Просыпаюсь в холодном поту. Мы живём сразу в нескольких эпохах, и каждая против нас. Зомбоящик нас утешает, подкрепляет надеждами, что нефть опять подорожает, что Запад без России замёрзнет, что украинцы, намучавшись зимой, снова позовут нашего кореша. А "Крымнаш" всё равно и навсегда, вон и несгибаемые революционеры Навальный с Ходорковским намекают», - говорится в этом письме. Да, намекают. Вот как одним намёком можно изменить своё общественное лицо. Или обернуться другим…