We hear from fools

The discussion in the style of "fool itself" (option: "And you have blacks hang!") Can cause a mockery only at Profan. In fact, this is a high art that can combine the most diverse talents. Including the commercial gift and literary erudition.

Take, for example, such a fed theme as the Third World War. Documentary and hopeless at the same time, since on our part so much has already been persuaded about the radioactive ash and occupation of European capitals, which it was almost impossible to polemicize. It would seem what to argue about if Russian military aircraft almost daily check the combat readiness of NATO aviation and some kind of naval underwater beast recently swam past himself past Stockholm. That is, according to trifles, it seems that it is possible to argue, indicating that it was a Dutch boat spying off the Swedish shores, but in fact it is not easy to discuss. Still, it is clear who unleashed the conflict, attaching the legs of the Crimea and teaching the civilian massacre in the Donbass.

But not, and the head of the Main Directorate of the International Military Cooperation of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation, Sergei Koshelev, convincingly proves to us who actually hatches aggressive plans. Bending over the map and making a brainstorming, the commander soon recognizes the intentions of the enemy and exposes his criminal intentions.

It turns out that already in the name of the NATO staff exercises, which are now in Estonia, anti -Russian intrigues are hidden. For the phrase "The Unified Trident" clearly indicates the yellow-loaf of the flag, which means that the West is preparing to fight for Ukraine. Further - more. According to the scenario approved in Brussels, one of the members of the bloc is attacked by an unnamed "hostile large state", and who is a hostile and large located next to the Baltic state? “From a geographical point of view,” the military leader sticks, “Estonia, on the territory of which the teachings passes, with the exception of the Russian Federation, borders exclusively on small friendly countries.” Hence? "Consequently, the teachings of NATO have a purely anti -Russian orientation."

And that's not all. “Against this background,” an employee of the Ministry of Defense finishes the enemy, “the walls of some NATO representatives look very strange in connection with the flight of a group of Russian aircraft in the international airspace in the North Atlantic.” In short, you are fools yourself, indicates the Western generals Koshelev, and how do you argue with him? After all, Estonia is really bordered by Russia, this is an immutable fact. So the moaning in connection with the span looks strange.

Or we will take freedom of speech - in its entirety and domestic originality. It seems that there is nothing to polemicize again, it is enough to recall the native television channels and the same radioactive ash. It is clear what is, for example, MIA "Russia today" with its inherent "Rasha Tuei" in comparison with the Western media. Not to mention CNN, which will leave our cable networks on New Year's Eve, conquering new Russian laws. Really, it is better not to compare and close the topic.

However, Margarita Simonyan is sick "from their famous democracy", and this is a powerful argument in discussion with the British. The fact is that RT, led by Margarita, two weeks ago launched a new television channel focused on the UK, and has already been honored with the local television and broadcasting regulator of OFCOM. Apparently, in London, the sweat does not hide the fact that we have long been sipping a full spoon, and the "rash of the Tuei" is threatened with sanctions: a fine, or even a license review. Moreover, complaints came for a long time, but before RT was not controlled by OFCOM, but now we have to answer questions.

And Simonyan answers. She stigmatizes the BBC shame, although this corporation does not participate in the scandal. She swears, you see, not to change the editorial policy, "no matter how crushed us." A well -read girl, she worries the shadows of Orwell and Huxley, English writers, who must “spin ... now in the coffins,” observing the torment of Margarita. She elevates her voice against the UK censorship, and it sounds very loud. Like any "Samdurah", said to the place and to the time.

Of course, all of them can be objected - both the officer and the girl. The penetrating Koshelev send, for example, to those quotes that he himself leads. In Estonia, they work out the "scenario of the attack" on the country, and yet any schoolboy knows how great the difference between defensive and offensive wars is. And if in Russia the Commander -in -Chief from time to time checks the combat readiness of entire armies, including rocket troops, then why would the Estonians not wave a trident? In general, no need to shift from the sore head to NATO - in such a kind, Kuleshov’s western arsonists of the war could answer Kuleshov.

As for Orwell with his Ministry of Truth, he would have something to look at in Putin’s Russia - this is how Simonyan can be objected. Moreover, look at home delivery, without a translator, as long as RT daily carries his Russian goods to the British consumer. He would be glad, Orwell, and burned himself - after all, every writer is pleased when his foresight come true. Even such foresights that are incompatible with life. So we, Russian -speaking, can be pleased with the writer, although he did not live. And to immerse that they survived.

However, all these objections are too weak to seriously discuss with them - from the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation and with Rasha Tuei. The dispute is inconceivable in principle: after all, "Samdurah" is an ancient technique, established, imperceptible. The profan laughs at her. The smart is sad, just in case, preparing for the war. Strong does not argue, but disconnects the sound, disarming the opponent.