Case: Russian orthodox

The World Russian People’s Cathedral was held in the XXS, and there are many interesting things. For example, Archpriest Chaplin made an act (or session) of cashing the enemy of the human race (Hostis Generis Humani). He performed at the Russian Entrepreneur club (in connection with VRNS) and said: “We are told that a well -known crisis with the fall of the ruble in relation to the dollar is an indicator of the state of our economy. Who said that? We see that the Russian economy did not fall by the quarter on which the ruble fell. This means that someone is trying to evaluate us not according to the real state of our economy, but according to the rules of the information bubble, which is first inflated, then descends. ”

Of course, the question is intriguing "Who said this?" Who is this malicious, unripe by name (Chaplin did not do this), who else is engaged in the fact that he inflates information bubbles, distorting the appearance of the world? Only the enemy of the human race in new circumstances. In fact, Chaplin thereby cashed it. Accordingly, a way to deal with him is to create an “independent banking system ... which would be based on ethical rules.” Moreover, this is by analogy with the Islamic Banking - “to offer the Orthodox system of banking without usury”, to refuse the currencies and economic instruments as much as possible “which are associated with the centers unfriendly”. And in the end, "twist the world economy according to our own rules." That is, the competition of denominations passes on the field of competition of the relevant banking and - further - financial systems. Not only Hostis Generis Humani is cashed, but all at all, after which - Chaplin is sure - only victory in the form, in general, power over the world (in a good, of course, sense).

Yes, this is a sudden turn of world history, but, right, it is too global to evaluate the scope of the idea of ​​one small column. But on VRNS there was another story more covered by local mind. There they began with the fact that they proposed a definition of Russian identity. This: “Russian is a person who considers himself Russian; not having other ethnic preferences; speaking in Russian; recognizing Orthodox Christianity by the basis of national spiritual culture; Feeling solidarity with the fate of the Russian people. "

This is glorious, finally we (Russians) will also have identity. But it is not quite clear how (by whom?) To be a person who knows how to speak not only in Russian, but also - this is what it is: “Do not have other ethnic preferences”? In what sense of "preferences"? I am specifically interested, for personal reasons. In general, these nuances are interesting, because the frame itself is boring, again some kind of “Russian world”, whose fans are so sure that any Russian in the world is certainly assigned to Russia, it is both metropolis and in general. The document only no one gives them any of them. So refreshment of the topic through preferences, that is, at a thin psychophysical level, is interesting.

Further this approach is affirmed directly, and this is a clear trend - the type here is the same cashing as that of Chaplin, but now the feelings: “Each Russian feels a deep emotional connection with the main events of his history: the baptism of Rus', the Battle of Kulikovo and overcoming, victories over Napoleon and Hitler.” Well, it is not entirely clear what the Ukrainian, say, Latvian Russians should feel on the subject of Kulikovo battle, and whether they are deleted in the absence of this sensation. Or in general, “Russian feels a deep emotional connection with the main events of its history” the key word “its own”-but do they live in places with another story? Or what will happen if any of the Russians (living anyway) will tell you doubts that K. Betva happened at all? Will he be canceled by nationality for trying to revise the results of Russian history? Rather, yes. According to this algorithm, everyone who does not feel solidarity at least one point should delete.

In a word, it was identified here by orthodox Russians. In the injecting, you just need to add this clarifying word: “Orthodox Russian is a person who considers himself Russian ...” - and further in the text, everything will turn out beautifully. Moreover, this is a real achievement in terms of taxonomy - such a category is wider and the concepts of “Russian” or “Russians” are already, so it is independent and independent. At the same time, the frame itself is based on sensations, and in the end - something unambiguous, even unexpectedly.

But there is a question, not at all polemic, but to ask: here it is identified, but what next? What to do with them, with orthodox, or something, fold somewhere? Well, frames are formed under the task. Judging by the fact that the Russian Orthodox Church MP was very leaning on the topic of nationality, the topic of the achievement of the Kingdom of Heaven was removed (neither Hellenic nor Judea). What instead? Of course, this was the topic of the struggle with the enemy of the human race in cashed out - according to the idea of ​​Chaplin.