A long way to the protocol

“It all started with the fact that on December 18 I flew to the New Year holidays from Moscow to Omsk. At the airport at the place of arrival in the closed area of the luggage department I was met by unknown people in civilian clothes. As it turned out, they were the employees of the FSB and CPE, who handed me a summons for a call for interrogation to the Investigative Committee. The agenda was handed by Mashuk Dmitry Alexandrovich (FSB), with the support of the Schengals Denis Yuryevich (CPE). They refused to answer questions about the details of the case by offering to call the investigator. Investigator Klimina Svetlana Egorovna said that I was called for interrogation as a witness in a criminal case. The details of the case did not specify, saying that this is the secret of the investigation and I need to come to the Investigative Committee with the passport.

Initially, the agenda that I was handed was compiled with obvious violations of even those articles, for example, part 1 of Art. 188 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (the procedure for calling for interrogation) to which the investigator refers. In particular, it was not indicated in the quality of whom I am called for interrogation, in what case I go through. Although I have the legal right to know this in accordance with the Code of Criminal Procedure. I stated this both directly to the persons who gave me the agenda and repeatedly to the investigator himself. Moreover, I filed a complaint on this issue to the Omsk Regional Prosecutor's Office, and the duty prosecutor, who accepted my complaint, Kuznetsov Dmitry Alexandrovich also confirmed this. I filed a complaint on the day of arrival and presentation of the agenda. In addition, the agenda was not a seal of the Investigative Committee, but by the FSB in the Omsk region.

Due to the fact that my call for interrogation was illegal, I did not appear at the illegal request. The next day, the investigator Svetlana Egorovna called me and demanded that I appear in the Investigative Committee, also without explaining what business and refusing to send me an official agenda, motivating this by the fact that she has no extra couriers. Thus, having made his demand not only illegal, but also extremely suspicious.

To clarify the situation, the chairman of the Omsk Regional Committee on Human Rights, Kuznetsov Valentin Nikolaevich, went to the Investigative Committee. Directly in the investigator’s office, after several professional issues from a human rights activist on violation of procedural norms and constitutional guarantees, investigator Klishin directly stated that after this interrogation I would become a witness, and then she will be able to issue an official agenda on legal grounds.

That is, in fact, I was in the investigation department voluntarily. But, as you know, the status of a witness/suspect is changing in one decision. Svetlana Egorovna decided to get rid of the extra presence and, saying that by proxy, officially executed by all the rules and notarized, my truster Valentin Nikolaevich cannot be present at this interrogation, suggested that I undergo an interrogation without a defender. To which it was refused. We were forced to leave the Investigative Committee. The atmosphere of absolute power and impunity was broken.

After a couple of days, returning home, at the entrance I again met employees in civilian clothes. Armed with a service camera and hired understood, now I am presented to the agenda of a slightly different format, at first glance, it even seems officially designed. It was made on the official form, indicating, as whom I am called for interrogation, all dates are printed, there are individual numbers. Investigator Klavina Svetlana Egorovna, who recently said that she had no extra couriers, still found them, and they became the employees of the Central Bank-the Maltsev Maltsev, and the video filming, Schengalz Denis Yuryevich, were awarded. He was also unknown with them, after the request he said he said that his name was Ivan and he was understood. Employees intervened here and said that he would be silent.

During repeated interrogation, investigator Klishin already conducted operational shooting, once again boldly saying that I was refused in the defender, since I am obliged to look for a defender only by criteria that arrange the investigation, which is a direct violation of my constitutional law not only to choose a defender, but also to the right to protect myself in any legal way.

She also explained again that she was not obliged to explain why we are called here and in what case. At the same time, there were armed employees of the Ministry of Internal Affairs, with the help of which the investigator wanted to get rid of my defender. But even they were shocked by the entire absurdity of the situation. After the openly illegal actions of the investigator, the second interrogation was over.

Of these two interrogations, I did not recognize anything on the merits of the criminal case on which they wanted to interrogate me.

The defenders were put up due to the fact that, no matter how paradoxical it sounded, they could protect me. In particular, during the first interrogation it all started relatively smooth after the investigator realized that she was asked uncomfortable questions, referring to the articles of the Criminal Code, the Code of Criminal Procedure, etc. (she rummaged in the computer, was looking for, convinced). It became obvious to her that it is impossible to expand the investigation according to the usual scenario when the witness plants himself. Then she said that I would receive the status after interrogation that some kind of power of attorney is not like that (it was framed in a decent notary office in the city center, with all the nuances and watermarks). Then she just asked if I was ready to undergo an interrogation without a defender, as if putting pressure on me. I told her - no.

In the second interrogation, it simply causes cops that came in fact immediately after us. And he asks them to clean the room, but the police do not even understand what was happening, since there was a verbal skirmish, and in the language of the law, they did not dare to intervene, because, be that as it may, we behaved correctly.

Already after the New Year, people in civilian clothes meet me at the exit at the entrance. Having jumped out of the car, they persistently try to ensure that I “proceed to the car”. I do not understand what is happening, they begin to say that there is a decree on the drive, and I have to go with them. The fact that I was already during interrogation twice and twice I was denied the defender, they were not interested.

The so -called resolution did not even indicate who, in fact, the contractor, who is responsible for everything that happens. After I said that I need to at least call, the FSB officer Mashuk Dmitry Alexandrovich said that “not worth it”. And then they grabbed me and dragged me into the car, on the go I only managed to say “I was seized” in the pipe, and I was in the back seat surrounded by two unknown people. Naturally, no one was thinking of introducing themselves, everyone was in civilian, neither tokens nor certificates showed. It looked from the side as a clear abduction, when several unknown persons pushing another person into the Volga - you can’t call it any other way.

In the car, they gave me a paper that was told to sign, I wrote in it that I did not agree with the drive and I consider it illegal, since I was repeatedly refused a defender, which is a direct violation of the current legislation. In the car, employees tried to prove to me that I was doing wrong, after which I reminded them that their actions, just like the actions of the investigator, were illegal.

After I was brought to the UK, the investigator Klavina Svetlana Egorovna directly stated that constitutional law had nothing to do with it, just like international. They work on the Code of Criminal Procedure and only according to the laws that arrange the investigation. During the interrogation, FSB officers were also present. They, like the investigator, said that I could appeal all the actions either in the prosecutor’s office or in court. They did it persistently, demonstrating their power, superiority and impunity.

Then they told me that they began the interrogation, asked what I knew about Boris Losev, his attitude to radical views and the notorious Internet community “White Brothers”, which, according to the investigator, was currently deleted, and remains a mystery to whether someone has seen him at all, but the case was opened and is currently being conducted.

For this, they are fined for a thousand rubles, for another. And here the FSB works, and the investigator who, in theory, is engaged in serious matters, murders of a special degree of severity, etc., they throw a lot of efforts in order to promote it.

During the interrogation, my friends arrived, after which the door was locked, and the operatives actually held me. At the end, they did not give me either a copy of the decision on the drive, or a copy of the interrogation protocol.

Fearing that the case, in my opinion, was fabricated and the innocent may suffer, I asked to show what the investigator was writing down in order to avoid paraphrasing. He gave examples, showed in the photographs that there are people of completely different nationalities on runs, Boris treats everyone equally well. On the pickets in support of Boris, one of the participants was a native of Yakutia, who advocates a healthy lifestyle.

The investigator said that, in principle, she knew that I would say so, it was necessary to do it right away. Nevertheless, I again expressed everything that I think about their work.

In general, they have an order from above, apparently Bondareva, the heads of the local UFSB, since they simply told them to crush, and they use all funds, in the usual situation they had long behind. ”