The warmth went

Good and evil investigators are the usual characters in the play that politicians play on world stage playing. Moreover, the roles sometimes change, and if, in pairs with his foreign minister, Steinmeier Frau Chancerer, as a rule, gives the impression of a tough leader, then against Obama, she, on the contrary, looks blue. And Obama himself is still a good investigator in comparison with the congressmen who prepared the bill on military assistance to Ukraine .

In England, everything is also difficult. So, the main diplomat of Her Majesty Philip Hammond Solidarno, with the Spanish colleague, opposes the supply of lethal weapons to Ukraine. Prime Minister Cameron with understanding and even concern for the patient responds to the next message about our military aircraft, plowing the sky near the southwestern borders of the kingdom. Russians are trying to attract attention, but we will not react - in this spirit the prime minister comments fresh news. They, they say, are so lonely, useless to anyone, well, let them fly. The English delicate humor is apparently accessible not to anyone.

The Minister of Defense Michael Fallon also jokes in his own way. But these are black humor, with elements of gloomy hopelessness. More precisely, he does not joke at all when he claims that the “Ukrainian” scenario Russia can also apply in the Baltic countries, and also states that President Putin poses “no less threat to Europe than the“ Islamic state. ”The minister is slightly reviving to the well -fed question about a new Cold War.“ It is already quite warm, ”he reports and everyone who wants to hear him.

Many respond, especially those who hit the joke and other words that accompanied it. The official representative of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation Lukashevich arranges the minister ethical rampant, rightly indicating that Obama, who put Putin's Russia and IGs in a row, has already said something similar. And the spokesman Peskov speaks about the phallon even sharper, although somewhat mysterious: "He who could say this is unlikely to understand the substance that he is talking about." Probably also trying to joke.

Meanwhile, the situation in the world to humor in all its varieties has little. The main trouble is that the British minister understands the “substance” with which he deals. In fact, after the Crimea and Donbass, everything is possible, including the liberation of the original Russian lands in the Baltic states, which witnesses are at least hammers with a ribbentrop. As for the assimilation of Putin to the leaders of the "Islamic state", this is still a big question, which of them is worse. In any case, the Middle Eastern warriors do not rattle nuclear weapons, since they do not have it. The latest military concept of the Russian Federation leaves the Commander -in -Chief of various opportunities for the use of nuclear weapons.

And he is generally prone to brutal jokes.

The main danger is not even that the trust between the West and Russia is completely lost. This has already happened under Stalin and in the pre -personal years - and nothing, there was. The main danger is that the nuclear apocalypse with its inherent radioactive ash has long been a weighty, rude, visible event in the reality that our TV creates. Some kind of encouraging event. Say, we are ours, we will build the new Russian world, and if it does not succeed, then it is lost, this land and this civilization. We live one!

And it would be okay that these campaigning, rallying national blows fell only on the head of a gullible Russian -speaking viewer. The whole world observes them with increasing bewilderment, longing and horror, which is gradually being melted into hatred. At the same time, the fear of missing a blow and undergoing guaranteed destruction is so great that the opposite side may also tempt to hit, without waiting for the performance of the most daring fantasies of Kiselev or Zhirinovsky there. Not to mention Putin. And if one side of the conflict actively incites the propaganda hysteria, and the other is inclined to the idea that the former member of the “eight” is capable of literally everything, then the most disappointing forecasts seem quite worthy of discussion.

Good and evil investigators are the usual characters in the play that politicians play on world stage playing, but here is what a problem arises. Sorting out the maps in the deck of Russian politicians of the first row, how to find among them the one who at least created the illusion of readiness for the world, did not lie every hour and pronounced human words? Who, in case of it, could keep the commander in chief from the disastrous thoughts and a disastrous step: not in a word, so by deed. In the back of the head, you will try to see at least one pigeon in this flock of hawks with iron beaks. A simple, unlike Western, the structure of our political world somehow leaves no hope.

This must be explained by the hopeless intonation of speeches of Western politicians, when they talk about Russia. Sunitter inclines them to caution and patience. A sense of the greatest responsibility for the fate of the world dictates the need to conduct endless negotiations with a person who can destroy civilization. The roles are distributed, and Steinmeier, as it were, Merkel, asks Obama to wait for the supply of weapons to Ukraine, he still holds back congressmen, Cameron looks at Russian fighters with unexpected complacency, and Falllon seeks our vacationers in Riga. This is such a game, but every time Western politicians speak out with extreme rigidity, it seems that their true feelings break through. And truthful words are pronounced, which reflects the world on the eve of a monstrous turning point in the life of millions of people.

What a "Islamic state" is there. What a cold war. The warmth went, yes.