
The author’s pride is a terrible thing, and this, at my amateurish author’s view, should be taken into account when hiring for service, for example, in the FSB. And if a person in the moments of leisure indulges in poems, writes stories or, God forbid, sculpts documentary prose, then for work in the special services he should be recognized as unsuitable. He does not want to, but he reproaches a state secret: in verses, in stories or, God forbid, in documentary prose. In the era of the Internet and various kinds of "anonymous international" this is especially dangerous.
Take at least Igor Strelkov, the famous of our commander and Chekist, whom the enemies called Girkin for courage. He had already given out a lot of secrets, including the sacraments of applied democracy in the Crimea - about how the "militias" drove local deputies into the hall so that they vote for a referendum there. However, some of his other secrets, more terrible, a person similar to Girkin, trusted only the closest associates, and still these facts of his biography became a public property .
For the commander and the Chekist in the soul are primarily a writer, and how he was to refrain from not preserving over -secret materials from a past life on a hard drive. Under the vulgar, but honest heading of the "Foil adventures". About how, together with the same as him, scumbags abducted and killed people in Chechnya at the beginning of the happy zero. Well, he entrusted, unknown hackers hacked his mail, the “New Gazeta” published a story stolen from the writer, and in the end we read a rather nasty written, but well -documented confession. A detailed report on the work of one of the death squads in Ichkeria. Confirmed by human rights activists who pierced documentary prose in their archives and certified its truthfulness. The ideal, in general, evidence for future historians and current prosecutors.
Here, of course, it is possible to object that historians will not soon come with shovels to rake our era, and prosecutors have more serious things to do. This is true: to investigate the atrocity without a statute of limitations, the theft of a canvas exhibited on the fence right in the middle of Russia is much more important today than to engage in hopeless reprisals and terrorism of special services in distant Chechnya. However, with this business, everything, it turns out, is not as simple as we thought, slightly shocked by the audience. Everything, it turns out, is even easier.
As it turned out during the scandal, which has been shaking Runet for a week, the case of the theft from the fence was self -advanced at the end of February last year. When the future defendant, an employee of the Corruption Fund Georgy Alburov, disrespectfully responded to his Twitter about the deputy of Yarova. In those days, a man, similar to the deputy head of the internal policy of the administration of the President Timur Prokopenko, was terribly angry, and the process went. The current prosecutors and current prosecutors, when they bring Alburov’s work to the end, but a slightly different properties than the “Girkin case”. It's not about prose writers.
Although all of them are also creative people, starting with Prokopenko himself and ending him with wards - deputies of the State Duma, the leaders of famous publications, journalists, artists. Only they construct the current reality, and memoirs about past affairs will not write under the fear of the death penalty. They, or something, is bashful than the writer of shooters, and their author’s pride of a different kind, nevertheless, the final of this story is the same. Rough hackers came, hacked the phone of a man similar to Prokopenko, and rushed. The GOSTaines opened, and many muddy events of recent years gained such clarity that the most sensitive of citizens even heard someone's cry. It cried a prison for a person who was terribly similar to Prokopenko, and people like some of those to whom he sent his orders, addressed requests and purely in a friendly manner gave advice.
Actually, there are material for dozens of criminal cases of varying degrees of stiffness - both against individuals and against entire organizations. Directly against the AP of the Russian Federation. Against Roskomnadzor. Against small officials organizing the injuries of opposition and direct provocations. Against state-forming television channels and newspapers, their chiefs and journalists-performers. Against the artist-humorist, delaying the title in exchange for loyalty. In short, against the system that corrupts the whole country, and easily guessing, focusing on Prokopenko, which people who look like Surkov, Volodin, Ivanov, Putin do.
Of course, none of the "information-spoiled" citizens doubted that gentlemen, who were painful in the Kremlin administrators and their service personnel, to the mass of his criminals, but when you fall to the sources (but not for the first time you fall), you are still amazed at the scale of this organized criminal activity. Well, the scale of idiocy, of course, is partly softens the guilt of the suspects. A good lawyer in the upcoming court is simply obliged to indicate to the prosecutors a mournful circumstance.
However, such a court is inconceivable today, as mentioned above, and we have to rely only on the trial. The court, which cannot be thought about without shudder, because during it such archives will be opened and such evidence will be heard, next to which the prose executions of the executioner, and the meager bureaucratic decrees and the dungeons will seem to be children's babble. And this probably shock the Russians for real, and not only those who, as they say, did not know and blindly believed, but also the most sober and sophisticated. Who will live. However, judging, judging again, by the scale of the disaster and some signs indicating a wild, undercover breeze in power and carnival plums, it was not too long. So the prosecutors will have enough work, and not all creators with a wounded author’s pride will leave the answer.