"Absurd, insanity and obscurantism"

A resident of the village of Kromy, the Oryol region, the German language teachers Alexander formerly judge for pro -Ukrainian poems. The accusation of inciting interethnic growth was based on the testimony of more than forty witnesses - mainly, school colleagues of the defendant. OVD-Info publishes the story of formerly about these evidence and first court hearings.

On March 30, when the trial of the “Poet-Stremist” began, several meetings have already been held. In general, this “event” was increasingly reminding a certain political talk show with elements of absurdity, insanity and obscurantism.

During the last court hearing, new interesting details began to be clarified. The other day, students with their parents called out the court. So one of them admitted that his peer from the 6th grade (the only one who allegedly heard from me in the lesson about “the roof that was breaking away from Putin”) after the “interrogation” in the office of the school director, where the representative of the prosecutor's office was present, told his classmates to answer the question of Alexander Mikhailovich that the teacher said, they say, “Putin had a roof after the Olympiad-they took off the roof. He introduced troops into the Crimea. " He learned about my poems from his parents. Then the real show began - a confrontation between students. It all ended that one of them understood something. By the way, the father of this schoolboy in a very emotional form very firmly opposed me, accusing of “anti -Russian creativity”, “incitement to the mass killings of Russians” and even “to obvious terrorist calls” (!!!).

The next “witness” (part-time employee of the church) gave a whole lecture about the “heir and rehabiliter of the fascism of the coward of the formerly” (though for some reason he called Shushkevich all the time) and read out his conviction to me, practically repeating the word for the whole 282 article on which I am judged. At the same time, to the lawyer’s question about whether Ukrainians have the right to resist the invaders, he went aside and repeated that the question was incomprehensible to him. Then he stated that there was no Ukrainian as a state at all and that "all this is our original land." He also amused the audience by answering the question of where he draws detailed information about the events in Ukraine, proudly replied that he was constantly watching the 1st channel of Russian television, where the whole truth was transmitted, which caused a smile even from the representative of the prosecution.

Two teachers also distinguished themselves, who “remembered” my words in poetry about “green men”, “how Russians poop under the bushes” and other “bargained fault”. They pointed out that I criticized Pushkin and Suvorov and dared to say that the Ukrainians on the Maidan were great when they overthrew Yanukovych. It should be added that the indignant speeches of my colleagues and phrases such as “such a teacher cannot be allowed to allow children” sounded in the presence of seven -graders invited to court (in which I led a foreign language last year).

But the most “slaughter” was an angry performance by the English language teacher, who branded me with a shame for “having supported Ukrainians to support the right of Ukrainians to independence and European choice, which is absolutely unacceptable”.

Naturally, no one again could recall the lines from the "Ukrainian patriots", which, it seems, finally plunged the judge into despondency. She repeatedly had to raise her voice on such “valuable witnesses”, who were constantly “entered” somewhere. These are our business. In short, the show continues.