Roman with lies

When you observe - even if not very closely and not at close range - behind the boiling activities of our special propagandists, you can see this is interesting.

On the one hand, from the highest stands all the time it is said that we are not fighting with anyone and we are not even going to at all, that no war, God forbid, cannot be. What in a neighboring country anyone is fighting and with anyone, but we have to do with it, you finally!

And from the TV and newspapers, it is not just propaganda, but by all signs - propaganda of wartime. All the time it seems that the malicious American banders are already here, literally at the gate - either in the Sretensky, or the Nikitsky.

And in war as in war. And therefore, you need to talk a lot, loudly, quickly, without thinking either about the credibility or the order of words in the sentence.

It is necessary not to prove and not convince. We must inspire . With all available means.

In addition to the full-time, waving their hands, bulging eyes and pronouncing the first words to them, but with certainly enduring the intonations of charlatans-hypnotizers, similar to those who once not without success tour of the sanatoriums and holiday houses of the dimensionless Fatherland, they were launched on the scene from the straw-nationality of the nationwide, as well as wilted, and also flooded The final search for the imperial Atlantis of writers who can - who can give them tribute - they must give them tribute - quite flowerfully retell the content of their colorful hallucinations and can present undoubted interest and curious material for specialists of a rather narrow profile - not for literary critics, for others.

Already now, not only from the frying of geopolitical ecstasy, but also from the respectable men's-analysts-analysts with impressive intonations, leisurely velvety speech and sneaked scholarly degrees in pockets, more and more often heard the words “magic”, “mystical”, “soured”.

The words are actually comfortable, what can I say. Convenient primarily by the fact that they absolutely free the speaker from some logic and even more so from intellectual and moral responsibility.

In this discourse, it is clearly refueling some kind of collective Blavatsky.

When you come across a hallucinator occult somewhere on this jamb, you involuntarily ask yourself: "Are they, or something, now we have irreconcilable wrestlers with Nazism?" Well, well ... they see a lot, they know about National Socialism and his "spiritual scrapers" if in their speech practice they themselves use them as natural as, for example, a toothpick.

What do they propagate, violently spitting in all directions with such ringing words as “fascism” and “junta”, and other concepts, crookedly seized from a completely different historical and geographical reality? What are the ideals or at least ideas? What except hatred? In addition to painful dreams? In addition to the hey, like apple trees and pears, bubble, sparkling, restless idiocy?

They talk about the phenomena and problems of the modern civilized world in approximately the same as during the time of their Gulag’s heart, one of the “political” retold for Blatarians, Barack's neighbors, works of world classics. For rations, of course, - not out of love for art. This genre, described in many memories, was called "To squeeze the romance." They say that there were once truly outstanding masters of this business.

So our fighters of the propaganda front are tirelessly “squeezing” there were fables from mysterious and unknown, like Lukomorye, life. In the language and in moral and aesthetic categories that are clearly understood by their target audience.

This is also curious and this is what.

The directors of the modern theater sometimes use approximately the same technique.

However, there are a number of significant differences. And, perhaps, the main of them is the difference between targeted audiences.

The theater performance, in which the classic text is freely prepared, is addressed to the viewer, to whom this very classic text is not just familiar, but very well. Therefore, its wayward interpretation and its “canonical” version are in a state of constant and, in cases of directorial success - a stressful and fascinating dialogue.

And all these “cultural” officials and other sufferers about the “abuse of the classic heritage” or they themselves do not remember very firmly how “Hamlet” ended there or who, as a result, shot the “three sisters” as a result, or are sure that everyone else does not know this.

The addressee of the television Brekhun is innocent and virgin, as a native of the island of Easter, is suspicious and tense, like a grandmother who spends days on a bench near the entrance, and vigilant, as the legendary dog ​​of the legendary border guard of Karatsupa.

What exactly do they stick into the soul of their addressee? First of all - rage.

Fury, which seems inappropriate to a normal person, rage about a different opinion, rage about fat signs, unprocessed symbols, flags, ribbons, monuments, portraits, rage about someone's careful doubt in the absolute truth of a sloppy picture of the world - this is the rage of a drug addict, whom they try to deprive the cherished dose.

To the massplant of people on this vile murderous needle is largely involved in television and newspaper special propagandists. And they will be responsible for this - along with their "employers" - sooner or later will have to.

I do not call on anyone’s heads heavenly heavenly - I do not speak this language. I do not want anyone to "burn in hell", and I do not wish anyone earthly torment. The torment of conscience - yes. Yes, only where would they take it, this conscience.

I wish myself something myself. I really want to live to court. To this trial - honest, fair, civilized, adversarial and open. With a wide and vowel public discussion. With prosecutors, defenders, witnesses ...

Witnesses, however, are already there. And they already testify. Everyone to the best of their own, their observation, to the best of the tenacity of their historical memory and the ability to distinguish the norm from pathology. And these witnesses - we are with you.