Vitishko's refusal to Udo confirmed

The judge of the Tambov regional court , Dmitry Istomin, confirmed the refusal of the ecologist-Poluzek Evgeny Vitishko in parole. This was reported on Twitter of the environmental shift in the North Caucasus. The decision of the first instance entered into legal force. The new petition for UDO Politsyk will be able to submit no earlier than six months later.

The official of the regional prosecutor's office of Pugovkin opposed the satisfaction of the appeal filed by the defense of Vitishko. The interests of Politzek were represented by lawyer Valentina Shaisipova. During the hearings, Istomin made a Shaisipa remark. The judge did not suit the position of the lawyer "too similar" to the position of her client.

Istomin banned photo and video shooting "in order to comply with the rights and legitimate interests of the participants in the process."

Vitishko, who is serving the term in the KP -2 in the village of Sadovy, Kirsovsky district, were taken to the regional center, but they did not bring to court - in the meeting he participated in video communication. The comrades of the Politzek considered this a mockery. “This is fine: bring a person and show on TV in a neighboring building,” the ecovakhta Twitter noted .

Speaking with the last word, the activist said: "In Russia, there are less and less methods of protection, it is necessary to appeal to foreign trials. So far, the state cannot ensure that human rights in our country."

On June 20, 2012, the judge of the Tuapse District Court of Kuban Galina Avji sentenced Vitishko and his colleague Suren Gazaryanto 3 years conditionally with a 2-year trial period on charges of damage to the governor of the region Alexander Tkachev. Later, a new business was opened against Gazaryan; He fled from Russia and received a political officer in Estonia.

On December 20, 2013, the judge of the Tuapse City Court Igor Milinchuk replaced Vitishko a conditional term for a 3-year sentence in a colony-settlement. The criminal-executive inspection insisted on tightening the punishment to the activist. On February 12, 2014, the judge of the Krasnodar Kraisud Andrei Konnov left this decision in force .

In February 2015, Vitishko filed a request for parole . However, on April 15, the judge of the Kirsanovsky district court, Yuri Losev, after hearing the objections of the KP-2 representatives,rejected this petition . Politzeku was guilty, in particular, bad work on a weeding of tomatoes and the fact that he was "sitting freely" in the date of the dates. Vitishko, in turn, spoke in court about violations in the colony, including the unjustified use of special equipment in relation to prisoners.

Meanwhile, on May 22, another lawyer Vitishko, Sergey Loktev, filed a petition to the Kirsanovsky District Court to replace the Politzek with an unsuitable part of the deadline with restriction of freedom . The lawyer referred to part 2 of Article 80 of the Criminal Code, which allows for convicts on charges of minor crimes the replacement of an imprisonment in the colony with a milder punishment after serving a third of the term. Vitishko was sentenced to 3 years in prison; Of these, 1 year 3 months, that is, more than a third of the term, it is in the colony.

On the same days, Politzek in KP-2 was visited by colleagues in Ekovakhta Andrei Rudomakh and Oleg Tenna. In the meeting report, they reported that the April decision to refuse UDO extremely negatively influenced Vitishko. “Eugene looked suppressed on a date,” the activists wrote. “According to him,“ his batteries end. ”Eugene repeated twice during a meeting that he could not stand another six months.”