“Now we can say quite clearly why it was on June 2 that the Almaz-Antey concern struck openness with the recognition of the fact of the destruction of flight MH17 by a Buk, but a “Ukrainian” one - after all, it was on June 2 that Russia received for review the draft text of the final conclusion of the international investigative groups.
As you can see, the box was opened simply - our media did not announce the fact of receiving the report, but they massively promoted the Almaz-Antey version, right up to its publication on the TASS website. The conclusions are obvious:
- Russia is not satisfied with the contents of the report;
“Almaz-Antey’s version is at odds with the conclusions of the report.”