
On Red Square, the police detained Vladimir Strap, who conducted a single picket with the poster "Return the Constituent Assembly." He himself reports this on his FB page. The activist was delivered to OP "Kitay-Gorod". There, a protocol was drawn up for it under part 5 of Article 20.2 of the Code of Administrative Offenses (violation of the procedure for holding a public event), after which they released.
"The purpose of the picket was to draw attention to the problem and the need to hold a new Constituent Assembly, expressing the will of the people and providing the historical and political continuity of the modern Russian state from the Russian Democratic Federal Republic, and not from terrorist state education, which was illegally created by the group of international adventurers and criminals, whose successors to this day are unleashed around the world," the Mediazon quotes the Mediazonquoted " Spertilev statement.
As the activist of the Frances said, the protocol against him will be considered in the Tver district court of the capital on July 22.
Spertilev also said that he intended together with colleagues in the protest movement to hold other promotions for the convocation of the Constituent Assembly. In particular, it intends to start at the CHANGE.ORG site a collection of signatures under the relevant requirement.
On July 2, Spertilev appealed to the Prosecutor General’s Office with a request to verify the legality of education in 1918 by the Russian Soviet Federal Socialist Republic and the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics in 1922.
"As you know, the Constituent Assembly was elected during a democratic folk will. 01/06/1918 He proclaimed the Russian Democratic Federal Republic. However, on the same day, 01/06/1918, forces controlled by the All -Russian Central Executive Committee and the Council of People's Commissars, the work of the All -Russian Constituent Assembly was forcibly terminated, and the All -Russian Central Executive Committee published a text called" Decree of the Decree of The dissolution of the Constituent Assembly, ”said Strap’s statement.
Spertilev refers to the previously adopted decision, which the Prosecutor General’s Office recognized the Crimean region illegal transfer from the RSFSR to the Ukrainian SSR.
The Prosecutor General’s Office first refused to accept a statement from Spentalev. However, after the consultations, an employee of the supervisory authority told him: "Yes, there is a deputy request, your application will be considered in parallel with him."
What kind of parliamentary request is in question, the employee did not specify. Perhaps this refers to the request of the unicorouss of Evgeny Fedorov and Anton Romanov on the legality of recognition of the independence of Latvia, Lithuania and Estonia by the State Council of the USSR in 1991. On June 16, deputies sent a letter to the prosecutor general Yuri Chaika with a request to evaluate whether the USSR State Council was legally created. Unicorns believe that it was an unconstitutional authority, which made a number of decisions, "caused huge damage to the sovereignty, state security and defense of the country."