Kobzon and emptiness

We will restore events. On Tuesday afternoon, Joseph Kobzon held an online conference with MK. Based on the statements on topics that are most popular with readers - Jeanne Friske, Zemfira and flag, lawmakers and sanctions - the editors of the site made separate notes. During the conversation about the abroad of Kobzon, on duty noting that the violations of the violets, without any, suspect, had dropped his back thought that if an operation in Europe would be needed - well, he would ask Putin’s help. The note went under the cap "I will turn to the president."

The next day, on Wednesday, the cut quote, changing the foggy subjunctive (“if anything-I’ll turn”) to the dashing injunctive (“Ah and I will turn!”), And in some places Future in the Past on Past Perfect (“I already turned”), turned into a information water, and her dozens of the media were reprinted. After reading the news, the public figure Mitya Aleshkovsky, who regularly saves sick children, to whom the sick Kobzon, together with the State Duma colleagues, forbade traveling abroad, was indignant and wrote an evening post on Facebook.

He refused to regret Kobzon, who was not allowed abroad, and suggested that treatment at the oncocenter on Kashirka would be the “best punishment” to the deputy of the “best punishment”. Late in the evening, the rain web editor on duty reinforced this text on the channel’s website, but the editor-in-chief Mikhail Zygar immediately shot and published on his Facebook apology . “We will not overshadow the atmosphere of hatred,” he explained. From the post of Aleshkovsky to an apology to Zygar, three hours passed.

On Thursday, in the morning, the liberal blogosphere was indignant at the act of Zygar (for Zhirinovsky, who called to hang Savchenko, did not apologize, but then!). On Thursday afternoon, the rain journalists on the air discussed the situation (Timur Olevsky: “This is a story about revenge”; Ilya Klishin: “This is a story about hatred”; Mikhail Zygar: “We do not need to draw likes in this area and replicate the calls for someone to die”). In the evening, Valery Panyushkin came on the air of the rain and told the story about the founder of the first Moscow Hospice Vera Millionshchikov, who would have accepted even Hitler there. Kobzon, meanwhile, it turns out, long ago explained to the Russian News Service, which he did not ask for anything.

The exhausted editor-in-chief of the independent channel, which has already seemed to be accused of everything-from disrespect for the blockade to alcoholism, probably, for reasons of “no matter what happened”, the text, in general, is, in general, the text.

Today, on Friday, I am not in vain so scrupulously analyzing the collision, which is essentially a reference extended media. This conflict is extremely illustrative.

Firstly, studying it, almost in the real time mode, you can trace, as in an air-free-free ideologized space, where there is practically no information media-only propaganda and counter-propaganda, an ersatz-nestan, as if in the place of a living, normally functioning organ, is growing after its defeat, a non-functional connective textile; The dead information farm has a lively response and intelligible consequences. Secondly, you can see how the mechanism works today in the media, which is devoted to the notorious media review of Dovlatov.

Here is a modern compromise in action: the exhausted editor-in-chief of an independent television channel, which has already been accused of everything-from disrespect for the blockers to alcoholism of the leading, probably, of his considerations, “no matter what it happened”, the innocent, in general, the text (and the author of the text, understanding the context, is completely not offended by it). In conditions when they can grab by the ass from either side and for any reason, an emergency quick response regime for imaginary threats from the outside is turned on. The reaction rate in this mode is priority, the clarity of thought is not.

From here it follows thirdly-and, probably, the main ones. We can observe how almost everyone discussing the case of Kobzon -Aleshkovsky is indicative of logic. Where did the assumption come from that one wishes another death - after all, this was not in the text, but for especially incomprehensible Aleshkovsky at the end of the post even signed that if the opportunity to personally save Kobzon, would he save? To whom it seemed to whom the discussion is not about whether the patriotic lawmaker Kobzon is normal to rush for treatment in Europe, where he, following the sick orphans, which he blocked the way there, now ordered the path himself - and about whether to execute the sick kobzon or have pardon? Who, in fact, generally said that Kobzon is eager for treatment for treatment?

The cleaned information field, the logic cleaned from the brains and the unconditional legitimization in the public space of the Old Testament Maxim, like an eye for an eye. " It seemed to Aleshkovsky that he had the absence of bloodthirsty intentions to Kobzon specifically, that this, as they say, is the goes without Saying -who at the beginning of the 21st century wishes the near painful death? And the editor -in -chief of the Rain television channel decided to seriously compete with the Old Testament infection. Because she has recently surrounded him inexorably, squeezing the ring tightly.