Five media -residents early August

The State Duma will be against copy -paste. The VGTRK seemed to create a fable service. "Lenta.ru" took care of the "stream of propaganda" and even! - Relations of the media with Roskomnadzor. Well, reality: "PROSport" is now without an investor and he is not very good.

1. State Duma against copy -paste. Gazeta.ru said that the chairman of the State Duma Committee on Information Policy, Information Technologies and Communications L. Levin announced the future attention of deputies to the topic of punishment of journalists for Copypast. In such words: "Indeed, there is a conversation with the journalistic community on the topic of additional changes in the legislation, including the" copypast. "We analyze this situation and, of course, look at the possibility of amendments, including the protection of publications in the media."

But where Levin said and for what reason - "Gazeta.ru" does not report. It only gives a link to TASS, but - general, just to the agency’s website as such. Well, it would be possible to find, but, in general, why produce the same copy -paste? Actually, everything is not clear there. What is a “copy -paste”, for example, according to Levin? The publications do not mind when they are reprinted and even vice versa. And if it is about the fact that the article is a whole, and the author is set by another - this is another story. So the topic is extremely theoretical and even interesting how deputies are suitable for it. According to Levin, "the issue of amending the legislation in terms of punishment for illegally copying the content of the State Duma is going to consider already to the autumn session." That is, while this can be perceived precisely as the announcement of the very first interests of the State Duma after the holidays.

2. VGTRK, as it were, created a service to combat fakes. "Lenta.ru" reports that the Holding VGTRK "created a special service to combat fakes." But only this is not an official press release at the base, but the conclusion from viewing the video containing a panel discussion at the youth forum "Territory of meanings on Klyazma." The video of the discussion was hanged on YouTube. "Ribbon ru" carefully laid it out at home and even froze immediately on the desired episode. That is, we are talking about one episode, and not at all about an official statement. It was like this:

An employee of one of the Leningrad Region channels asked (for a long time mannerly) the question of whether the federal media can tell a lie to the people who trust them. As an example, a plot was given from the program "Special correspondent". There it was about children's education in Norway. The author of the plot, E. Popov “claimed that Norwegian children will find out very early about homosexuality. The text was confirmed by the frames of the room, hung with pictures of naked men. Later it turned out that the video shown on the air. The original on the wall of the room was a large sticker of the jeep.”

To this political observer of the VGTRK and host of the Vesti at 20:00 program on the Russia-1 channel Andrei Kondrashov replied that "federal media are obliged to tell the truth to his viewer." After that, he explained (thus, in the topic) that "the team that prepared a report was not involved in creating a video: editors who helped Popov collect the material, took a ready -made fake from the network for a clean coin. According to Kondrashov, the author apologized to the audience for the demonstrated fake." Where and in what form the author did this was not specified. This is where it was said that "VGTRK created a special service to combat fakes." Alas, from these words it is impossible to understand what kind of unit this is and what exactly - except for bringing apologies - can be included in its functions. The topic of "telling the truth to its viewer" was also not disclosed - but it is interesting how he sees his viewer VGTRK.

3. "Lenta.ru" took care of the "stream of propaganda." Once again, "Lenta.ru", the title: " Journalism has always been part of the propaganda work." The subtitle "Alexei Pivovarov about why he will not return to socio-political TV." It is not easy there. At first, in fact, the PR of the new Pivovarov project: “In June, Alexei Pivovarov, who disappeared from the television screens after leaving NTV, became the host of the Park project on Channel One ... On the air of the“ Park ”“ Woman-Spider ”climbs the Moscow-City skyscraper, Safronov’s magicians are piercing through the lead, Denis Matsuev plays the roy The soaring flyboarders, the actors read Pushkin’s poems in Latvian and Ethiopian, Santa Claus walks along the summer alleys, and next to the cinema “Pioneer” are dancing in a word, the creators of the program do everything in order to keep the attention of the viewer in the beginning of Sunday for two hours. ”

And then the UPS ... and here are the such dialogs:

" - did not spare about the departure from the socio -political TV?"
- No, I never regretted it. Could I work on the news further? I don’t know, I try not to ask myself this question.

- Not sure that they would cope with the flow of propaganda? Do you generally agree that journalism on federal TV has degenerated into propaganda?
- Journalism is always part of propaganda work, a question in the degree of concentration. Here everyone decides for himself whether it is acceptable or not. I would personally feel uncomfortable in today's news. But I know respected people who still work there and believe that this is the right thing. I am not a judge for them. But I would not want to be in their place ...

- Well, he took a position, moved to the other side (we are talking about K. Goldenzweig, who, as if with a scandal left with NTV, started talking about him, “Lenta.ru”, - O.E.). In your opinion, should a journalist be on a certain side?
- I never tried to live in such a paradigm. I hope that I will continue to be able to avoid division into “ours” and “not ours”. I know for sure that people are very multifaceted, they appear differently in different situations. And to give such estimates to televisors as, conditionally, Dmitry Bykov gives me, I am very respected by me, I will never. I worked on TV in not the simplest years, albeit simpler than now. To divide the world into white and black, if you want it, is easy. Moreover, now it is in trend. "

And what was it? It looks like "Lenta.ru" (with an unknown - from the side - the goal) wanted to promote Pivovarov on emotions and denunciation. But he never succumbed to. Well, maybe it was the second part of the PR.

4. "Lenta.ru" was worried - even! - Relations of the media with Roskomnadzor. Yes, "Lenta.ru" once again about all these media. Just even some kind of sudden front. Well, or a field study of media reality. Title : "This is an ostrich policy", a subtitle: "The life of Russian journalists in the context of total prohibitions."

Introduction to the topic: “Over the past two months, Roskomnadzor issued a warning of five media outlets at once.“ Rosbalt ” - for calls to extremism, Radio“ Says Moscow ” - for denial of family values, MAXIM magazine - for Mat, and“ Novaya Gazeta ”and Colta.ru - for publishing excerpts from literary works, albeit hidden by depressions. Of course, the main obstacle to the media is essentially forbidden reporters to write texts about cancer -patients or suicides: neither the methods of suicide or the name of the drugs can be mentioned.

Further, representatives of the above media present their points of view:

- Alexander Malenkov, editor -in -chief of the male magazine MAXIM ("On June 11, the court fined the magazine for the mat in an interview with the former soloist of the Lyapis Trubetskoy group Sergey Mikhalku").
- Journalist Valery Panyushkin ("On the prohibitions on the publication of information about suicide and drugs).
- Dmitry Muratov, editor -in -chief of Novaya Gazeta (on July 20, the publication received a warning for the use of a mat in a published fragment from the book "Crystal in a Transparent Rimming". "
- Philip Dzyadko, a journalist (July 24 Roskomnadzor issued a warning to Colta.ru for Mat in the review of Dzyadko for a cycle of poems by Julia Gugoleva).
- Larisa Afonina, General Director of Rosbalt ("On July 15, the agency received a warning for a video with extremist calls attached to the news").

The case, of course, is subtle. However, the Materials of Lenta.ru was balanced by V. Ampelonsky, the press secretary of Roskomnadzor, whose explanation of the situation ends with the words “the department advocates the professional and wide discussion of all acute socially significant problems in the media, subject to strict compliance with the norms of the current legislation. Roskomnadzor does not doubt its decisions, as it relies on expertise. The regulator does not have the right Legislative initiative to change laws. "

5. Well, material reality: "PROSport" without an investor and he is not very good . At least one news should be in a specific fact and here it is. Kommersant said that “PROSPORY” magazine, one of the most popular sports publications in the country, was on the verge of closing. Last year, controls of the TOP-managers of the export unit “Gazprom” bought control from Roman Abramovich’s structures last year, although they planned to spend 75 million rubles in three years. Founders. Founders. Founders. Founders. The magazines are trying to attract new investors, among the candidates - the basketball player Cleveland Cavaliers Timofei Mozgov.

In short, then this is a magazine (well, the site too), where Vasily Utkin soloes. Kommersant gives the following data on the provision of the publication in the market: “PROSport” is one of the most popular sports publications in the country with the middle audience of one number 477.1 thousand people, according to TNS for December-April. For comparison: each daily “Sport-Express” number 401.1 thousand Russians, “Soviet sports”-“Soviet sports”-“Soviet sports”- 293.7 thousand. "

Now it’s sour, on the left in the main news it sticks out: “15:35 July 21, the new President FIFA will be selected on February 26. 14:12 July 10, Spartak, the former coach of Spartak Valery Karpin received the club from Armavir. 13:17 05 July Football Cup of America won the Chilea team.” Today, August 4 is actually, and Karpin and his Armavir have already set some kind of record, having tied 0-0 five times in a row.

In "Kommersant", of course, is full of financial details. In particular, the editor -in -chief of the publishing house S. Gridasov said that "our main investor does not fulfill his obligations, which are taken up to 2016 inclusive, and since April has stopped contacting." As for a possible new investor, the “representative of the basketball player confirmed Kommersant that such negotiations are underway, Timofey Mozgov’s interest in the“ high ”project.“ This is not so much a business project as a social-to support the publication that occupies a strong niche, ”he explained. Yes, once the main owner was R. Abramovich, but he left in 2013, "having lost interest in Russian football."

According to Gridasov, “the new owners signed an investment plan for 75 million rubles for three years. According to a business plan, in 2016, the company was supposed to reach operational profitability, but the ID managed to get about 25% of the promised amount ... We gained an additional office, planned the advertising campaign. Part suddenly fell on the advertising income of the magazine.