The Daria Polyudova case. Preliminary hearings

In accordance with Art. 234 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, all preliminary hearings are held closed. Oper FSB Kotenko came, he was not allowed.

At a preliminary hearing, my lawyer filed a petition for a psychological examination in court for the motive for committing a “crime” and a request to introduce a psychological study for the establishment of a motive. The judge said that this issue will be considered in the main court hearing at the stage of researching evidence.

I filed a request for the introduction of characteristics from the place of study and at the place of residence. By the way, the preliminary investigation authorities attached completely opposite characteristics to the case, they were all negative. For example, in my characteristic from the place of study at the NFCU of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Russian Federation (Novorossiysk branch of the Krasnodar University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs- ATS-Info ), I was characterized as a good student, and in terms of personal qualities as “sociable and friendly”. This characteristic was given to me on 9.04.2012 by the time of graduation at the university.

In the characteristic that the preliminary investigation authorities took, when I was in the pre -trial detention center, it is indicated that I was a good student, but in personal communication showed egoism. Of course, these characteristics do not play a significant role for a criminal case, but nevertheless, the very fact is that the FSB authorities make such characteristics that they need.

By the way, both characteristics from the place of study were signed by the head of the branch of the Krasnodar University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs Vladimir Sosov, only by different dates.

In the characteristics of the place of residence that I petitioned to be attached to my case, it is indicated that I lived for some time in the village of Poltava, then I went to study in Novorossiysk, and then nothing is known about me at the place of residence. From the neighbors there was a statement that I was not deprived of my freedom, it states that I did not engage in antisocial life, but only studied.

Judge Goncharov introduced all my characteristics to the case. He was slightly surprised that the preliminary investigation authorities themselves collect characteristics, said that in his practice this is the first time.

Then he asked my position on the case. I said that I do not plead guilty, since in the posts according to the episodes of part 1 of Art. 280, part 2 of Art. 280 of the Criminal Code, I did not call for the forcibly overthrow of the basics of the constitutional system, but according to the episode where it is charged with Part 2 of Art. 280.1 of the Criminal Code, I posted a record to troll the authorities. I am innocent, since in my actions there is no intent to commit a crime on a subjective basis.

The preliminary hearing did not last long. The lawyer filed a petition for a preliminary hearing in order to attach a psychological study and submit a petition to conduct a psychological forensic examination for the motive for committing a crime. These actions will be considered by the judge at the main court hearing.

The first meeting on the merits of my case will be held in the Oktyabrsky District Court of Krasnodar on September 3 at 10 a.m. Witnesses will be interrogated on it. One of them is Sergey Titarenko, who gave indictments against me, but I did not give testimony against him when I was interrogated in his case. (Meetings in the case of Titarenko himself, also accused of calling for extremist activities in connection with publication on social networks, will begin in the Leninsky District Court of Krasnodar on September 2 at 09:30- OTD-info .)

At the second hearing, evidence will be investigated if at the first court hearing they have time to interrogate all witnesses in my case.