DETECTED grocery

Detector Brechni. On the first day of the trial of the hope of Savchenko’s hope, the Russian procedural dictionary was enriched with this amazing turn, and the point here, of course, is not only that the accused is fundamentally in Ukrainian . In Russian, we can also say that, just the phrase then loses its neutral meaning and sounds mockingly. In relation to those who started this process. In general, pulls on the symbol.

Indeed, if during the court both her and the “other people”, which Savchenko calls for , will be interrogated using this wonderful detector, then it will be possible to check everyone by testing. Witnesses of the prosecution, who will tell how the pilot "secretly" put forward "to the area of ​​the positions of the people's militia," where she performed "the functions of the fire adjustor." Some eyewitnesses, claiming that then, as if freed from captivity, again "secretly crossed the state border of the Russian Federation with Ukraine" and was detained. Investigators who were doused with tears over this fiction. As well as prosecutors who, on the first day of the hearing, almost without hesitation read this essay. They believe themselves or do not believe, tell the truth or sprinkle - everything will be installed using a smart device.

Moreover, the circle of interviewers can be constantly expanded during the adversarial process. These Cossacks, for example, flooding the court of court, are also interested in asking for - where did they come from, what task they perform, what do they think in their heads? And it would be interesting to check the activists of the NODs picket the court on the typewriter: who drove them there, and how much now public impulses and civil valor?

But, of course, the most fascinating will begin at a time when, in the framework of a purely legal procedure, in order to establish the truth to the detector, the Brekhni will connect representatives of the Russian government. Well, there are such vague suspicions that the trial of Savchenko is a political event, and they must be dispelled. Therefore, it is absolutely necessary to interrogate, for example, Bortnikov, Seagull, Bastrykin. As well as Vladimir Putin, the President of the Russian Federation, who rejected these suspicions some time ago and spoke out in the sense that, they say, as the court would decide - it will be so. If the defendant is guilty, then it will be punished. And if, imagine, "it turns out ... that she is not to blame for anything, she will be immediately freed."

Agree, is this an entertaining question: did the president lied or did not lie? And so, in order to find out the correct answer, it would be nice to connect it to the polygraph and, having interrogated in full, overdue the entire approaching one. This in itself would become an exciting and instructive spectacle, but, most importantly, the frank testimonies of such a witness could provide a court under the chairmanship of Leonid Stepanenko in a verdict. Objective, which, by the way, was predicted by the president.

At the same time, it would be possible, deepening into the topic, to solve other, purely theoretical issues. Like, if the whole process, from beginning to end, from the captivity of Savchenko to the sentence, was, for example, a farce with a pre -known sentence, what was planned later? Underpromising endless torment? Exchange within the framework of a long political process? When and on what conditions? On people, on sanctions, on the resumption of membership in the "eight", the recognition of Crimea, for anything else? Or there was no strategic plan, but there was only a desire to be cursed over enemies? In other words, it was sadism, as it were, tactical properties: first we will plant, and there we will see? How with Khodorkovsky, Lebedev, Bakhmina, Aleksanyan, Pichugin, Prisoners of Bolotnaya, Oleg Navalny, Oleg Sentsov and Alexander Kolchenko?

That's how much interesting we could find out.

However, some sixth feeling, as well as many years of experience in continuous observation of Russian political processes, suggests that there will be none of this. And Putin will not be interrogated on the detector of nonsense, and prosecutors, and investigators, and even Savchenko herself. For the at least good reason that the truth about this case has long been known and none of the accusers is needed. And we need a court, we need a sentence and a hostage is very necessary, for which everything was organized: abduction, investigation and this process in the Donetsk city court of the Rostov region.

The real such, natural, long - with prosecutors and lawyers, witnesses of prosecution and protection, with the debate of the parties and finding out the smallest details. As in the West, but also not devoid of local color. Since its main content is a nonsense.

However, during all these hearings, the truth sometimes sounds, which is the very essence of the process built on lies. This is a well -known property of truthful speeches: against the backdrop of total lies, these speeches sound especially bright. The main trouble of the organizers of the demonstration court is that they were very unlucky with the accused. Young, fearless, furious, she is capable of every time she appears in public, in a manner of very aphoristic to express everything that she thinks of life in prison and her tormentors.

About the escorts that I will not dare to repeat now, respecting the sacred feelings of Roskomnadzor, and about the state of health - “not to remember” - and about all this “stuffed circus”, which is called Russian justice in everyday life. And as for the detector of Brechni, who just bring it to the hall - the whole court will run away with the prosecutors. The pilot is not a philologist at all, but the words find the most accurate, memorable, deadly. The process should last until the end of October, and this means that the disgrace acquires the dynamics and we will now see and hear it very often, and in it find bitter consolation.