
The Posoputin bloggers compete in Putin’s speech praise in the UN, while others are perplexed - why so much enthusiasm?
A review of the responses to Putin’s performance in New York and his meeting with Obama will begin with assessments issued by pro-government, “patriotic” bloggers. They choose different words, but one picture - Putin has reached such a triumph that the light has not yet seen. Both “viral” pictures and verbose “analytics” are used.
I watched the broadcast of our president at the UN General Assembly. A sense of pride in Russia is overwhelming! pic.twitter.com/tbec8vzpne
- Gordeev Alexander (@gordeev_av) September 28, 2015 Roseniy: - Did you hear Putin said "in short"? - Yes! It was divine! - In short, the world will change - the best speech! - This is the best shorter in the world!
- Joseph Stalin (@stalingulag) September 28, 2015 He carefully listened to performances to the UN Obama and Putin. I can say with confidence: "The world should be grateful that he has Putin."
- Lisovienko Alexey (@deputat_lis) September 28, 2015Pride is mainly caused by the fact that the President of the Russian Federation, as is customary to say in this environment, "bent the Pindos."
The anpirator seems to have never said the word "USA". And that’s right: we are not opposed to the beautiful country of America, but by the impersonal power of the fools with a printed machine.
Brief retelling of the seven -million UN Assembly: pic.twitter.com/kfxsnn1urn
- Lepers (@leprasorium) September 28, 2015 Actually, #Putin simply reports #USA in #the UN , approximately like Saturdays. “Do you even understand what you have done”?
- Twrsch Pltrk (@Pltrk) September 28, 2015 As a result, today another era has come. The era where there are again two poles in the world - the USA and Russia.
We have long returned a place in the Premier League. But it was Monday that was needed so that the new era began. <...> Now we need a club, a whip, a broom and a scoop for garbage. The first and second are Americans. The rest is their liberal party within the country and in Ukraine. Then it will be possible to call Putin the great. During life.
The theme of water on Mars again surfaced - following the Facebook conspiracyologists the thesis that NASA specifically reported that water was found on Mars to interrupt interest in Putin, deputy Nikonov said.
The insidiousness and meanness of the subdopinders know the boundaries! (water on Mars, by the way, really found) pic.twitter.com/msj89YKVEM
- Sputnik & Pogrom (@sputnikipogrom) September 28, 2015 It turns out that the Americans found water on Mars to humiliate Putin "Mars as the CIA project was developing" Pic.twitter.com/h3dn0hevcg
- Timur Khorev (@timurkhorev) September 28, 2015The theme "Putin against the water" masterfully closed Roman Volobuev
It would be cool if water spoke at the UN, and Putin was found on Mars.
I hope that Putin will say the next speech right on Mars. Better on Jupiter.
- David Homak (@aalien) September 28, 2015At the same time, literally the same commentators who sang the geopolitical “victory” over America are childishly rejoicing that the American president closed with Putin at the reception.
And here is a photo of the day, if not years. pic.twitter.com/h9jtgj0df0
- Polite people (@antimidan_rf) September 28, 2015Of course, there are questions to commentators:
All, peel away faster from your Mercedes slogans about a monkey and schmuck. Now they can plant pic.twitter.com/a8yf1jpehl for this
- Roman Yukhnovets (@roman_yhnovec) September 28, 2015 Question to the Putinists: if Obama is schmuck, and Putin shook his hand, then who is after that Putin?
- Elshad Babaev (Ministry of Internal Affairs) (@lshad_babaev) September 28, 2015Of course, it was also not forgotten about the Crimea (although Putin himself mentioned him in his speech).
Tales about Generalissimo Kim Il Sene
At the end of negotiations with US President Barack Obama, an unknown woman in a Russian folk dress said thanks to Vladimir Putin for Crimea. The president thanked "for support."
http://ria.ru/world/20150929/128958658.html#ixzz3n6ytff7j
That is, in the UN building there is suddenly an unknown woman in a carnival suit. She is allowed to Putin and she thanks him “for the Crimea” - obviously, on behalf of all unknown women in Russian folk dresses walking along the UN corridors.
Some kind of cranberry.
Larchik, however, just opened.
But the same "unknown woman in a Russian folk costume", which on the sidelines of the General Assembly "thanked Putin for Crimea." She is an employee of the UN apparatus.
Against this popular background, Christina Poddchik seems to be almost an unauthorized analyst.
Vladimir Putin secured the image of the main peacekeeper, whose goal is the stability and balanced development of the world geopolitical system.
Boris Mezhuev in Izvestia develops the topic:
This day, September 28, 2015, will remain in the memory of our citizens as the day of the triumph of the Russian “soft power” and as the day of the emergence of a new Russian superpower.
The language of Andrei Babitsky is less enthusiastic - but the more delight in the content of his assessments:
Putin is a good politician. Repeating the same thing, sooner or later he gets the effect (or has already achieved) - in the unity of his views, their logic, at least, in the sequence, the Western public has no chance not to believe. Actually, this is a win -win policy, which seems boring, not very loud and even Ingda Capitulant. But she goes to her goal by an unmistakable method - the accumulation of trust.
And so on and the like. A wave of admiration swept, of course, not only Facebook, but also a television screen.
While waiting for his inclusion, a journalist from some Russian channel, as well as the divine Olga Skabeeva from Russia, turned on nearby. From their inclusions, I learned that Putin’s speech was fateful, he made a lot of bright and exact remarks, the hall welcomed his performance, and American journalists already pulled him out for quotes.
That's how it turns out.
Sputnik satellite of the viewer.
On all channels, experts argue:
- It was an outstanding speech.
- Well, what are you saying nonsense, the brilliant speech was.
“Excuse me, but you are both wrong.” This is just the greatest day in the history of mankind.
You can summarize all of the above:
The admiration of Putin’s lounge is reminiscent of the admiration of people with the clothes of the naked king.
- Gray Cardinal (@Slevo4kin) September 28, 2015Oleg Kashin is perplexed over the new dress of the king:
The most amazing one, of course - how many people seriously consider Putin a charismatic, a good speaker, etc.
Have you seen? No, have you seen? Today, the UN of the Russian President was allowed to the microphone! He spoke there for thirty minutes!
Thirty minutes!
On the same tribune as the king of Jordan!
They listened to him! Beautiful people in costumes sat and listened!
Russia to the UN! Incredible!
And then they patted him! And they shook your hand!
They came up straight and shook!
There is a video! photos! They showed on TV!
This is evidence of the greatness of Russia.
We went to this result a thousand years of Russian statehood and finally came.
The opinions that Putin said nothing new and did not achieve anything from Obama (and only, perhaps, worsened his position) - of course, also many.
I read on a piece of paper and stammered. He said nothing new.
For the power is a shame!
Once again we saw that a dude is a victim of his own TV. A typical retired officer, a conspiracyologist of a small mind.
If Vladimir Putin (as usual) was in everything in all rights and came to the UN to point out mistakes made by others and sincerely call on to rational and responsible steps - why did he constantly look at the report, and not to the floor, and only several times raised his eyes to the hall, unlike all the other participants? Did he talk to people, or with himself? A very strange impression ...
Well, in the wake of the General Assembly. I agree with Kashin - how wild it is to understand that a bunch of people considers Putin a charismatic and good speaker. After all, there is a complete zero. Believe me, I abstracted from political hostility, I can do it, and this is an objective assessment. <...>
Here in the conditions of normal political life in Russia, if it were necessary to participate in the debate, perform at real election rallies, and not at the stripped shows, to speak at meetings with unprofitable voters, and even just walk along the streets - what would the prospects of this person be?
Briefly speaking. He worries for the right of Veto, appears to cancel the sanctions plaintively, protects Assad and, apparently, accepted Islam.
- Alexey Navalny (@navalny) September 28, 2015
Surrendered like a beaten dog. A very miserable breech. This is not the president of a sovereign country on which the sanctions #Putinkillermh17 do not
- Putin's back (@spina_putina) September 28, 2015There are those who were not impressed by Putin’s speech and his communication with Obama, and among the "patriots of Novorossia":
Listen, and explain to me what is Peremoga?
Let the black gentlemen go to the table? Pour a glass? Well, a banquet, well, Obama. But so that right like that?
I personally recalled this frame from the "fate of man". There, remember, too, foreigners poured a Russian person.
And the " satellite and pogrom " is so offensive that he put Putin as an example of Khrushchev:
Due to the fact that the Putinobots have already begun to write idiotic texts about the “strong, vivid, historical speech of Vladimir Putin to the UN”, I would like to recall how vivid speech in the UN <...> Khrushchevsky USSR and Putin’s Russian Federation actually looks like the states from different leagues. And their leaders communicate with the world in different ways: Khrushch is such a drunk rural owner-kham, looking for whom to tear out, and Putin is a wandered footman, which was called to the carpet.
Criticizing the UN as an organization allegedly incapable of effectively solving conflict issues, the Russian leadership is a miserable likeness of its former power. Even the comedy Khrushchev with his boot on the stands - for the current Eurasian officials - is truly an unattainable value.
This unprecedented impudence, bordering on despair, is an awareness of Russia's complete unclaimed in its former simple qualities, even in the form of world scarecrow.
The gigantic political gap between the "country" and civilization appeared clearly and distinctly.
Some commentators, on the contrary, are glad at least that Putin (relatively speaking) did not knock at the UN boot.
Dmitry Gudkov
Putin’s performance at the UN vividly reminded the phrase "Madame, I am an old soldier and I do not know the words of love."
It can be seen that he wants negotiations. Rather, trading and transactions, after which he would have managed to get out of international isolation, again to communicate on equal terms with the leaders of the G7, and not refer, as today, that we will still discuss the dominance of individual wrong countries in G20. <...> The direction Putin chose the right one: from sanctions, enmity, isolation, you need to leave. But the tool so far is not worthless. God will give, the West will see in this speech something other than the duty charges of hegemony and geopolitical ambitions. Then a completely stabbed window of diplomatic capabilities may open. But so far there is little hope for this. Wanting does not mean to be able to.
The minced meat, you see, is very difficult to turn back, and restore meat from cutlets - at all.
Alfred Koch analyzes Putin’s speech in great detail and comes to this conclusion:
In short: I'm white and fluffy. Friendship-yellow. Here is a speech that, even before it was uttered, the Kremlin media have already called historical. As Saltykov Shchedrin wrote: “They expected the bloodpropyliye from him, and he ate Chizhika”
Ekaterina Vinokurova is generally pleased with Putin's speech.
And I have Putin’s speech to the UN did not cause negative emotions.
I do not understand your righteous anger on both sides. Ok, the opposition wanted him to knock on the table with a boot in order to repose later photos with comments "Finally, the whole world realized that our president is crazy." The patriots wanted him to knock on the table with a boot, and then they repel photos with a comment such as Obama Schmo.
And the usual normal speech came out, I generally agree with the Syrian-Igilov part.
Vladimir Milov explains why, from his point of view, speech cannot be called "normal":
Putin is an idiot. And those who wrote to him yesterday - idiots.
It is time to understand for a long time that these are all these performances from the stands about the “US hegemony” (the “Unified Center for Domination” in his text) is a sign of the fact that the dictator is a zhulik. All normal countries are trying to build good relations with the United States, and not run into them (and this is always mutually). And this is a sign of a normal country. Because then what? Well, the US hegemony, well, do not like it. What an alternative? Multipolar chaos? So Vova again did not offer any alternative, except for blah blah blah. Other countries read this: another dictator Zhulik with the next banal outpourings, which in the problems of his wrapped regime of the United States is to blame. Gaddafi spoke with the same in 2009, with his endless many hours of speech. <...>
And they listened to him “with a breath”, as all sorts of Kremlin lyzobates say, for one reason - to count between the lines of the info, on whom these Bandos will attack tomorrow. There are no illusions, our wonderful country is now perceived in the world mainly only in such an aspect.
Vladimir Golyshev about the same - in other words:
He could froze anything. The main thing is how it was done.
At first everything was nothing. The outcast dullly chewed his cheat sheet.
And then he decided to pierce - "soak", so to speak, "in the toilet" Abamka. And he buried himself ...
Monday ended the personal meeting of Putin and Obama - however, not “face to face”, but in the presence of delegations.
After the handshake of Putin and Obama Solovyov jokes: "Well, ours did not take it right away at the pain, so that the conversation went easier!" Laughter, applause.
- City.ru (@granitweet) September 28, 2015 Vladimir #Putin during negotiations looks at Barack Obama. The look talks about everything pic.twitter.com/lxdhsmb680
- Dmitry Smirnov (@Dimsmirnov175) September 28, 2015 Well, they talked for an hour and 40 minutes. This patient is Obama.
- Roman Dobrokhotov (@dobrokhotov) September 28, 2015What was the conversation about - opinions are varying, but Putin said that he was very frank.
- Barack, maybe you will not increase the retirement age? - Vladimir, you ask the impossible.
- Rosjirnadzor (@cunst_antin) September 29, 2015There was no "breakthrough" at the meeting - however, they did not wait for him.
Well, there was not even a joint press conference. Lavrov says that he did not expect that they would agree on something.
Stop already afraid that the West will salt everything. And stop hoping for re-procurement. Both of course can happen - if there are not refugees tents on the Hungarian border, but ISIS tanks. So far nothing is planned, you can not worry. And do not hope for someone like.
In general, the "historical" speech was discussed, and everything returns to its circles.