
They called the French ambassador , but he did not understand why he was called. The Swiss were scolded, and they say that there was a "routine patrol of airspace", although, of course, they regret it. I had to apologize to the French, whowere scolded all day before.
The Russian Foreign Ministry indicated that "the actions of Paris undermine the possibility of using France as the venue for multilateral meetings and negotiations." And the deputy-communist Gavrilov, who watched the “dangerous maneuvering” into the porthole, argued that "before the country entering the NATO structure, under Charles de Gaulle, Mitterane and even Sarcoszy, this behavior would be unthinkable." That is, it fell into the sin of conspiracyology. In this connection, a number of questions arose: do the Norman Four dream about the dissolution of the Norman Four in the Kremlin, what about NATO, as well as Charles de Gaulle?
The story with the "Lainer of Naryshkin" and the aircraft flying around him is generally full of mysteries.
It remains unclear why experts of the famous aerospace forces of the Russian Federation, stuck to their monitors, failed to distinguish between Swiss fighters from French. Swiss aircraft have the right to fly in the Swiss sky when it is plowed by the Russian parliamentary delegation or do not. The incident itself occurred by accident or was provoked by certain dark forces, or air or even cosmic forces. And if so, then what dark forces were interested in ensuring that the peaceful flight of Naryshkina with Matvienko, who joined him and other members of the delegation was overshadowed by routine patrol. They exist, these forces, or only faded.
The only thing that humanly is clear is the painful reaction of the Russian side. The fact is that both of our speakers are included in the sanctions lists of the United States and the European Union. We can say that these lists are headed and decorated. The scandal associated with the refusal of Matvienko to visit New York, where she was still allowed to come, but was tightly limited in movements, is still fresh. Naryshkin himself in July was not allowed in Helsinki, where the session of the OSCE parliamentary Assembly was held, and Sergey Evgenievich was very upset . Together with his delegation, which was not released from Moscow in protest.
All this was extremely unpleasant, and it is easy to guess that preparations for a visit to Geneva to participate in the next assembly of the Inter -Parliamentary Union were held in an environment of increased nervousness. It was unknown at first whether they will give visas or not. And when the Swiss finally deigned them to issue them and the Russians soared over the Confederation, this strange incident happened, which was called a “dangerous rapprochement” in the original note presented to the French ambassador in Moscow.
By the way, this expression should be recognized as very successful - in relation to the dialogue of Russia with the West as a whole. Indeed, it is worth our authorities to somehow break away from the Earth and enter into a discussion with those who, in Moscow, noticeably restraining themselves, are called Western partners, as sparks are directly carved. This happens with Putin himself when he has the gathered in the same New York, rhetorically asking: what, they say, do you understand, what have you been done? And a little later, having not agreed with Obama, he goes to bomb Syria, which brings the nuclear apocalypse closer as much as possible. Or here's how it is now. They flew to themselves, dissecting Switzerland and anticipating the holiday, but also worried in advance, when suddenly a French -looking plane came from, and it went away. Continuous dangerous rapprochement.
In order to avoid them in the future, one of the parties needs to develop the correct model of behavior.
If the Russian authorities want them to be accepted somewhere at least occasionally, then they probably should, somehow still hidden, do not arrange scandals. Neither large nor trifles. This applies to the highest authorities, and speakers, and ordinary parliamentarians. So, speaking from the UN rostrum, you need to resist obvious rudeness and verbal boletes. Flying over Switzerland, where they suddenly let the sanctions in spite of the sanctions, it is not necessary to grind the heavens too meticulously, and landing, lifting the noise and raging for a long time. Moreover, not understanding what the “Naryshkin Liner” accompanied for the plane, and calling the innocent French ambassador to the carpet.
In such cases, the Swiss people are almost necessary to accuse almost of terrorism. They are still at home and also surprisingly hospitable owners, they were invited to the assembly. Another time, what good will not be invited.
On the other hand, it is possible that the fulfillment of these norms may not be affected by senior guests from Russia. They are too offended by the whole world and in any honorary escort recognize aggressive intentions. As if the Turks, by golly, at the sight of a Russian fighter. That’s why the following thought arises: or maybe not to let them go anywhere else, Naryshkin and others, higher and lower, so as not to injure? The reason is: sanctions. Precedents of their violations by the West cause rather mournful feelings. Moreover, Western politicians themselves and diplomats themselves turn out to be extreme when they are called to answer for insulting wings or for daring to disagree with the proposals of Vladimir Vladimirovich.
How to avoid a collision? Who will give in to anyone - the inviting side or dear guests? When will this finally happen, to universal joy and in the name of peace on Earth? It is difficult to predict with accuracy, but the second model seems more realistic than the first.