
The recent article in the Rossiyskaya Gazeta regarding the possibility and even desirability of homeopathic treatment of tumors stirred society. On the one hand, the ethics of the publication of an obviously custom article with advertising subtext (indicating the clinic) without a mark that it is published as advertising. Well, everyone is somehow used to violations of ethical rules. But there is another aspect of the problem, much more unpleasant. In the context of the destruction of domestic healthcare, all kinds of muddy agdiesic forces surfaced during the ongoing reforms and optimizations. At the same time, resistance to charlatans is growing. And not only in the person of the commission to combat the pseudoscience of the Russian Academy of Sciences. Discussions are undergoing hot, many believe that "let them live."
There is a complex, not completely resolved question: who to call a charlatan? Where is the border between science and the anti -jacket, where is the line between medicine and dubious sagging? Yes, this is the official term: "Pulling." Like other terms that do not caress the hearing: “negligence” (in one word), “medication of society”. The latter is the intimidation of people with all sorts of horror stories to increase the sales of drugs, hygiene, vaccines, devices, etc. In the process of drug, non -ladies appear - either not existing at all, or existing, but the danger of which hypertrophies to the problems of national security. Most often, negligions have an “infectious nature”: chicken flu and rabies, pork flu and atypical pneumonia, ebola fever, but also chronic fatigue syndrome and also syndrome
Wrinkles on the face. The main that identifies the property of the property is a necessity, usually vital, huge costs. Politicians believe in such horror stories with half a turn, but ordinary people believe. And what remains to do if serious people tell you from the screen?

Sooner or later, the donkey ears come out of the polests, the doctors of the common interests of certain oligarchic groups come out. But there are stable myths that are passed down from generation to generation. These include homeopathy. She found a warm place next to ordinary medicine: people with medical diplomas, and not healers and fortunetellers, are engaged in it. In Russia, homeopathic remedies are even included in the register of drugs. Although the latter is more than strange: soon 5 years, as for registering the medicine, it is necessary
To present information about his trials, namely this homeopaths do not even do: they know for sure the result - zilch. Indistinguishable from the result of placebo (dummy). With most diseases, the placebo effect (weakening of the symptoms of the disease) can reach 40%. And it doesn’t matter what will happen: sugar granules or charged water - everything helps. But modern medicine counts the real effect of technology from a significant exceeding the placebo effect.
I do not want to blame all homeopaths of accusing all homeopaths. I admit that among them there are people who are enthusiastic, believing in miracles. Only now deceived patients have to do with it? Well, the headache was treated or snot there is no question. Although there can be many different diseases behind a headache. But here are tumors, especially malignant ... This is a direct deception. Moreover, the deception is murderous. After all, someone will believe and go there to be treated. How many such cases, and in my memory: people left normal treatment and went to all sorts of miracles. But they could live. Cases of cure and sarcoma - only documented at least histologically - in addition to normal therapy! If there was at least one, the whole world would have buzzed from such a sensation.
I went to the site repeatedly advertised in the articles of the Russian Newspaper (official body, by the way) of the clinic. There are no oncologists. The license and in published documents do not say anything about oncology. And in the article of Krasnopolskaya the opposite is approved: they treat patients with tumors there. Maybe Roszdravnadzor should ask what is happening there: the clinic, according to its chief physician, works with cancer patients, which is not allowed by licensed requirements. Please consider this an official appeal to the leadership of Roszdravnadzor. The introduction of a huge number of sick people in misconception regarding the methods of tumor therapy seems to me a crime. And not abstract, but quite criminal. However, I am not a lawyer, I can, of course, be mistaken. But I am not mistaken in the professional and ethical assessment of the publication of the story of the doctor about miracles. Here she can safely make a diagnosis: Dr. Irina Kuzmina is a dangerous charlatan.