
I discovered another "mole" on the tops of the Russian government. And what! Until recently, my most valuable source, Mr. School teacher, deliberately positions himself exclusively as a mediacrot , a kind of bird of God, flutters as an interlocutor from one feast of all -willed to the other and at a moment of fateful whiskey selecting crumbs of valuable information, so that, returning to the nested nest, dissolve the feathers and share with the audience and the listeners to share the pretending Atmosphere of drug intimacy with the powers of this world.
Flies, you know, separately, and cutlets separately. Future ribbentrops and stainers should sit on the same bench, and gentlemen are independent journalists, just in case, on the other. Especially in our difficult time, when the all -good, as insiders assure us , thump in their bunker for days.
Fedor L. is a bird of a completely different flight. This is a mole conceptualist, not only diligently fixing the atmosphere of feasts of small-town Valtasars, but also to the best of his strength and progressive beliefs trying to initiatively form and ennoble it. For the first time, I paid attention to him in April, when, as part of an active event, he rolled out the first frank recognition by the Kremlin of the Ukrainian adventure and the project of a transaction with the West, which, as it seemed to him, the Putin Wance Peaceful Coexistence Wit the West, the Kremlin.
Then I made a mistake , greatly underestimated him. Soviet journalist Viktor Louis was a banal agent of the KGB, who disciplinedly performed simple special instructions. Fedor L. imagines himself one of the critics of Russian foreign policy, a person close to a world -class diplomat, masterfully owning professional skill, which, in the absence of a clear goal -setting, turns into art for the sake of art. The exquisite compliment, which could decorate the final speech of the defender of the Ribbentrop in the Nuremberg process, and at the same time fulfilled by high citizenship, an unambiguous reproach for those who, according to the Constitution of the Russian Federation, seem to ensure a clear goal -setting of Russian foreign policy.
In his April long telegram, Fedor L. very delicately and tactfully tried to put in his lips a dove with his iron wings and his circle moderately imperial understanding of foreign policy tasks ( Putin Wants ... , we want Putin): “Crimean”, maintaining positions in the Donbass, no new military adventures (“dangerous and too expensive” and most importantly - peaceful - peaceful - peaceful - peace coexistence with the West. I recognize his hand in the cherry that was later flickered on a non -transshipment cake: the anti -Hitler coalition is an underwear meme underestimated by an iron pigeon.
Only six months have passed, and the October dispatch “What do we want: why Russia needs a military operation in Syria? ”, Broadcasting the mood of a significant part of the establishment, is already perceived as a manifesto on the verge of apical riot on his knees. First of all, Fedor is much more sharply than in the text of Putin Wants ... , evaluates the Ukrainian adventure of a good Hitler and its ideological support:
The Russian World was perceived as a revival of an ideological agenda in foreign policy, which was supposed to record Russia at a higher level of the hierarchy. It quickly became clear that this doctrine, effective within the country, outside Russia does not expand, but limits. In essence, the "Russian world" is anti -global. It outlines a certain range, and it is impossible to captivate anyone else with this idea, it is obviously not interested in anyone except the Russians. As a result, the Ukrainian conflict, which began under the conversation that Russia was tired of enduring Western dominance and it challenges foundations, led to the political periphery. "
Strong, like oak in the back mind, chairman of the Council on Foreign and Defense Policy of the Russian Federation ! Prices would not be his merciless estimates and wise warnings a year and a half ago, after pronouncing the leader’s famous speech about the divided people in the Kremlin. And many human lives would be saved. And today I would not have to ask the question "What do we want in Syria?" But the most important Mr. The chairman still did not understand: the chimeras of the "Russian world" and "New Russia" failed primarily because they were rejected by the overwhelming majority of Russian people both in Ukraine and in Russia itself. They were not very effective within the country. To the honor of the Russian people, he proved that he was much less struck by the imperial-patriotic rabies virus than his thieving "elite".
This is not NATO approaching us, but neighboring peoples and states are scattering from us, our polite spirituality and camouflage universal responsiveness
Not a people, not a mythical “Uralvagonzavod”, but this is the Elite suffering from the manic-depressive syndrome of the Elite spiritually merciful by his fantasies and complexes of the subject that the poet and culturologist Alexei Shiropaev spoke about in the recent essay : “Putin is absolutely Mamleev’s type, and his appearance is appropriate. His reasoning about the“ Sacred Crimea ”is absolutely Mamleevsky, imagine Putin in a T-shirt in a common kitchen, and better-a quiet, faceless inhabitant of a communal apartment, from time to time something muttering about traditional values, dull speaking behind the closed door of their rooms with certain entities and then it turns out that the guy is a serial maniac. "
The egg -headed Arbatovs and the Lukyanovs, the training and the Karaganovs, the Lukins and the legal entities of their quarter -century titanic struggle against the “expansion of NATO” and for the “dominance in the post -Soviet space” gave rise to this estimated subject in a T -shirt, as Ivan Karamazov raised Smerdyakov. They never understood that nobody needs them with their dominance in the post -Soviet space and that this is not NATO approaching us, and neighboring peoples and states are scattered from us, our polite spirituality and camouflage universal responsiveness. And now they are in confusion ask themselves the question "What are we (that is, they and the man in the T -shirt) do we want in Syria?" And they admit to themselves that they do not know the answer. They admit, but still together they continue to chew the nauseating “geopolitical” chewing gum: “ The Middle East is our step to return to the global arena. The Kremlin correctly appreciated that Syria is the only serious asset that he possesses, the key to all the processes there. The risk is really great, although there is a chance to gain a foothold .” In spite of the arrogant pindos, I will add.
This is what kind of insanity the Kremlin’s foreign policy should have reached, so that its only asset remains a military alliance with the Syrian butcher and terrorists of the Hezbollah and the Corps of the Guardians of the Islamic Revolution. Direct the fed it with your global political advice Fedor, you can’t say better!
Not to a random drinking companion, but to heaven of an eternally cursed and ever -attractive West, they turn their existential Russian question thumping in the bunker: "Do you respect me?" And again there is no answer ...
And cops (Ivanov, Shoigu, Patrushev, Rogozin) will come as horsemen of the apocalypse and in fulfillment of the last fateful decision of the Security Council of the Russian Federation to in the inventory of individual means of protecting citizens will award four individual sets of protection from chemical, biological, radiological and thermal lesions from the father in the T -shirt. So the prophetic word of Alexei Shiropaev will respond. It turned out to be our father not a father, but a super -series global maniac.
Andrey Piontkovsky - political expert
Opinions expressed under the heading "Law" may not reflect the point of view of the editorial office