
In fact, how should this be understood? Russia is fighting in Syria everything, unlike the "Western coalition", but there is "not a single terrorist attack" against them, and our plane seems to be blown up. Is it a conspiracy or an agreement? “It is known that the American military easily agree on their own security with terrorists,” and if so, if it is really known, we simply did not know before, then “the thought goes on.” That is, the head thinks and wonders: "is it not" a terrorist attack on board the Russian airbus "with a product of agreement not to touch the civilian aircraft of the Western coalition?"
In this spirit, Dmitry Kiselev thought and existed a week ago, and in his voice was resentment. The Pentagon, according to the TV presenter, concluded with the Islamists a Pact about non -aggression to the West, and the Russians were also imposed by sanctions. There was also a suspicion that imperialists with terrorists had agreed not only about this. A thoughtful listener of the weekly program, comprehending what was said, slowly but surely comprehended that scumbags in Sharm-Esh-Sheikh acted on the tip of the Americans.
A week later, after a terrorist attack in Paris, the same viewer could decide that the Islamists heard Kiselev, were ashamed and corrected. However, about the political schemes that arise in the head of our permanent viewer, one can only guess. It is only clear that the slender picture of the world, drawn by the brush of a true artist, faded and gained its original mystery. The world again became unknowable.
Actually, he is one, and in order to perceive it in its entirety, integrity and incomprehensibility, it is not at all necessary to listen to the weekly propaganda nonsense Dmitry Kiselev. Sensible politicians and experts acting on other, non -federal television channels, writing in newspapers and blogs, for all their temptation to simple questions such as "Why Paris?" And "how do we end terrorism?" The answers are given evasive. The answers that indicate a total confusion. The answers that come down to the fact that the world is unknowable.
If, having mastered what he read and understanding something independently, to summarize preliminary results, then the conclusion must be drawn: it is impossible to win a war with terror. This is the reality in which we live. This is bad news, but there is good. We cannot lose either. For all his sedantism and merciless cruelty, the killer is much weaker and smaller than those whom they seek to kill. The Middle Ages, which forever lagged behind civilization and takes revenge on it for this, exploding bombs and shooting people, won only local victories. And for each such victory pays on the largest accounts.
The payment for September 11 was the defeat of the Taliban in Afghanistan and the “unnecessary” war of Bush in Iraq, the meaning of which was a demonstrative redundancy. The payment for Paris will be a noticeable expansion of a preventive war with terror in Europe and in Syria, where ground invasion is not excluded. Civilization is invincible in a fight with the notorious "Islamic state", but the indicated "state" is also invincible, and this means that there is no end to the war.
True, there is still one tiny chance to win the terrorists. For terror is like a plague, and if the infection of hatred and xenophobia will take root in European hearts and in each of its swarthy and bearded compatriot or a foreigner, the majority of residents of France, Germany, Belgium, Sweden will begin to see the potential killer and vote for those who calls to beat strangers, set fire to their dormitories and deportate, then with European values will be with European values It is over soon. It is equally with Europe, for the political and human wildness is inseparable from the technological, and if the free world collapses, carried away by counter -terrorist operations in a broad sense, then progress will have to be forgotten. Fear that does not distinguish a refugee from a terrorist will win, and in a world where the struggle for the purity of the race will become a fundamental principle, there will be nothing to breathe.
It will be a world where a collective Brayvik or those fighters of the National Socialist underground will triumph, who for years have shot citizens with the wrong skin of the skin in Germany. In fact, the fighters were no different from Ben Laden. Today, considerable crowds gather under these red-brown banners in some European countries, and their leaders, showcase racists and Nazis, are welcomed in Russia, in the former Leningrad, and a blockade city. They are in demand here.
This is Europe, which is seen by the organizers of terrorist attacks in dreams, is a stabbed and feral, led by various kinds of "national fronts". Of course, the Islamists, of course, have to fight with her, but already finally imposing their own rules. Including hatred of America, which is to blame and sponsor terror, and what did you think? On TV, they said, in the Russian "Vesti", which are now broadcast in all European languages. Once on TV, it means true.
Fortunately, it has not yet reached this yet, and the quoted Kiselev is a person non grata in Europe, and the political terror of a special kind, who won in Russia, is hardly further spreading further than Donbass. Still, the plague on the old continent has long been over, and rare epidemic outbreaks are characteristic more likely for underdeveloped countries, but there is also relatively small mortality.
Another thing is propaganda, its permanent breath, as well as Islamists, sowing death and carrying infection. A reliable means of protection against them is not invented, and you seem to get used to it, well, what can you do. After all, you can’t change anything by clinging to the television screen or wandering around the city in which hell is happening, and you will not resurrect any of the dead. There is no means to stop terror. But the running line again overshadows all the news, and behind each letter blood and death, and at that moment you clearly realize that it is impossible to get used to it.