Independence of man. Applies to everyone.

On December 7, the judge of the Basmanny Court of Moscow Natalya Dudar issued the first sentence under Art. 212.1 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation (“repeated violation of the established procedure for the organization or holding a meeting, rally, demonstration, procession or picket”), sentencing Ildar Dadin to 3 years in prison in a general regime colony

On December 10, the verdict was expected to another defendant under the same article, to Vladimir Ivanovich Ionov. But the 76-year-old Ionov instead of the trial was in intensive care: Heart ...

Article 212.1 - one continuous legal forgery. You cannot judge and punish the same thing twice - first by the "administrative", then by the "criminal".

And also because several “administrators” - at least two, at least twenty -two - do not add up to the “criminal”. These are two different “areas” - for example, by the degree of protection of the defendant in the process.

In theory, since the “administrative” cannot give a lot, the defendant does not need a defender here. The meeting is not held. There is no equality of the parties, the judge is “one in two persons”: it makes a decision - and, in fact, is the charge.

What scope for conveyor production, for sewing deeds and stamping of decisions gives this, thousands of detainees from December 2011 at mass rallies and passed through administrative processes have felt.

The protocols written in the “under carbonated” protocols are confused by the place, time, circumstances of the detention. Some were delayed, others “delivered”, “filled” others, and the fourth witnesses in court - but this does not bother anyone!

Ildar Dadin in the Basmanny Court, Moscow, December 7, 2015

People are dragged from the courtroom, Moscow December 7, 2015

It is one thing when in this way they wrote out five hundred rubles of a fine per person. But the fines grew to tens of thousands, and the results of such “justice” form the basis of the criminal prosecution, which “according to the law” can slam “two -legged” or “trescel”.

For what? For the fact that ten years ago was permitted and ordinary. And how is this consistent with the norms of the European Convention on the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms? Funny question. Some gap in space and time returns us half a century ago: in 1966, together with the “slanderous” article 190 “approx”, the 190th “approx three” “organization” or active participation in group actions that violate public order, or associated with obvious disobedience, was introduced, or entailed violations of the transport, public, public, public, public. institutions or enterprises ” - also up to three years ...“ Back to the future ”? The impression is also aggravated by the fact that his father testified against Dadin in court ...

The use of this "law" is no less cynical than it is. Ildar Dadin for “repeatedness” violations was charged with four episodes. One of which was not at all related to “public events”, and two were single pickets that did not violate even our dragon legislation.

Fines grew to tens of thousands,
And the results of such "justice"
Late the basis of the criminal prosecution,
which "by law" can slap
"Two -legged" or "Treeschka"

Vladimir Ionov’s, the trial of which was moved to December 16, among other “repeated violations” - a single picket on January 10 of this year with a poster “I am Charlie” ...

Dadin, Ionov, and also Mark Halperin, over whom Article 212.1 is also “hanging” - what they did not understand what time was in the yard? They understood very well. And they are fully consistent with this time. It is noteworthy that during the trial, it was Ildar Dadin, and not the prosecution and the court, voiced a position based on the Constitution, appealing to the rights and freedoms of citizens.

The Memorial human rights center considers anyone held liable under Article 212.1 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation to be persecuted illegally, for political reasons, and any deprived of a freedom on its basis - political prisoners. We demand the immediate cessation of the criminal prosecution of Ildar Dadin, his unconditional liberation and cancellation of Article 212.1 of the Russian Criminal Code.

Photo: YouTube.com