Translated material
Seagulls and Tsapki, or back to the future
"The Seagull case" goes to a new level. Yesterday, Olga Lopatin , the former spouse of the deputy general prosecutor Gennady Lopatin, filed a lawsuit against Alexei Navalny, the Corruption Fund, several FBK employees and ... Google. What does the ex -wife of the prosecutor achieve, says Kommersant:
The subject of the lawsuit is the false, according to Olga Lopatina, the information common by the defendants in the article “Chaika. Crime drama in five parts ”, as well as a video version of this article.
In particular, Mrs. Lopatin demands to refute the information from the article and the film that she is supposedly or was the co -owner of the Kuban Sugar, along with the wives of the leaders of the Kushchevsky gang, Sergei Tsapk and Vyacheslav Tsepogos (about the investigation of the case of the group and the fate of her leaders “Kommersant” more than once). The plaintiff claims that she learned about the existence of this company only from the publication of the FBK, meanwhile she never visited Kushchevka, she did not create any companies there, and is not familiar with the wives of local bandits. Mrs. Lopatin believes that the registration data of ARLIN LLC, the position of the sole executive body of which it occupied, was used in the registration of Sahara Kubani without its knowledge and permission. In this regard, on December 8, 2015, Olga Lopatina sent an application to the head of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia for the Kushchevsky District with a request to check the circumstances of the use of her personal data during the registration of Sahar Kuban. A criminal case has already been instituted on this fact.
The lawsuit notes that the company “Sugar of the Kuban” since the creation in 2008 has never conducted economic and financial activities, in its documents there are no instructions on the revenue, profit and bank account, and in 2010, even before the exposure of the Tsapka gang, the company was excluded from the Unified State Register of Legal Entities. This is stated in the official response of the Krasnodar Regional Federal Tax Service, received at the request of Mrs. Lopatina. As the representative of the plaintiff explained, she is ready to prove in court the inaccuracy and other information regarding her from the publication of the FBK.
I come back so urgently from the vacation so that Putin about the seagull to ask and find myself with a co -shaper with Google. Nice company!
- George Alburov (@alburov) December 15, 2015 The wife of the prosecutor Lopatin sued me for 1) me, 2) FBK, 3) Alburova, 4) Sobol, 5) Google. Someone is missing here ... Where is Browner?
- Alexey Navalny (@navalny) December 15, 2015Further - more. Soon after, a criminal case was opened in the Krasnodar Territory on the forgery of documents of Sugar Kuban:
As a source in law enforcement agencies told TASS, the criminal case was opened on December 15 after checking the application from Lopatina herself. The decision on initiation of the case (TASS has text) says that "unidentified persons in an unidentified place, but no later than 10.09.2008 (September 10, 2008), were made knowingly false documents about the organization of a legal entity" Sugar Kubani ", where" ARLIN LLC "was indicated as one of the co -founders in the person of the General Director Olga Lopatina, on whose behalf of which Signatures and seals were placed in the charter and constituent agreement.
Then they were submitted to the IFTS in the Kushchevsky district, where the LLC was registered on September 10, 2008.
At the same time, as the pre-investigation check established, Lopatin herself did not sign these documents and did not express the will to create a legal entity in any way. Criminal case under Part 3 of Art. 327 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation ("Using a knowingly forgery document") was excited "in relation to an unidentified person."
A lawsuit against Navalny and Guglu, a criminal case on the fact of falsification of extracts from the Unified State Register of Legal Entities, hellish story with a mushroom - have you ever seen such a hysteria?
- Kira Yarmys (@kira_yarmysh) December 15, 2015 I like to wave with extracts where Lopatin, Old Believers, Tsepovyaz and Tsapok are nearby. From this, it will never turn away from this. pic.twitter.com/qRt2HDOPTF
- IVAN ZHDANOV (@ioannzh) December 15, 2015Well, this is a browner! And foreign special services. In 2008, Brauder in the mask of Lopatina entered the registration chamber of the Krasnodar Territory and there fed the honest Olga Lopatina, forcibly making it a shareholder of the Kuban sugar with wives of her tsapkov.
Then Obama and McCain sent a local CIA resident to the IFTS in the Kushchevsky district to register the LLC.
Well, then, from 2008 to 2015, a cunning reconnaissance operation of Mossad and Mi-6 was carried out, during which the agents acquired and issued various elite real estate with a total value of more than a billion rubles for relatives of the prosecutor Lopatin.
What kind of crimes the enemies of Russia will not go to discredit the honest name of the General Prosecutor's Office of the Russian Federation.
The whole situation looks very comical so far.
Firstly, Lopatin wants to recover money in compensation for non-pecuniary damage not only with FBK (we are used to it), but also with Google.
Secondly, they have not yet seen the claim, but the wording “requires the information about its supposedly illegal activity that is not relevant and prohibited to spread” says that Lopatin does not want to follow the path of recognition of information by false, but insists that it is impossible to spread information about it (apparently, according to the law on oblivion). If so, then this will be the first precedent in Russia, when the law on oblivion was used and see who was used! Business Partner of Tsapkov and Tsepovyaz.
Thirdly, sheet with reference to Interfax write that the lawyer Lopatina is Vladislav Mushroom. Through the search for Russian lawyers Vladislav, only one is given a mushroom, so a mistake can hardly be. This means that this is exactly the mushroom that is a member of the Public Council at the FSB, a member of the Public Chamber of Russia (participates there in the distribution of grants!), And also ... my former premanent! I remember him well by student years. Because only the lazy did not laugh at Vladislav Valerievich. It was the most stupid (sorry) teacher of all that I only saw in my life. For half a year, he led the seminars at my group, but we, students, did not learn anything sensible from him. But during the training, they listened to a bunch of shoes and all sorts of stories from his life. As, for example, about how he, a person from the region, was able to buy a large apartment in the culture park in his youth.
Perhaps, in vain, the mushroom told us all this. Because after today's news it becomes extremely obvious how this "man from the region" was able to earn such an apartment.
On all screens. Termibrauder-6 pic.twitter.com/vieenmwmvo
- Bob Farber (@Bobchensk) December 15, 2015 "Lopatina admits that, together with his wife, Tsapka opened the company, but does not admit that at the same time she signed some papers" Shah and Mat, Obama
- Economics of the Russian Federation (@PutinSeconomy) December 15, 2015 Does Patrushev’s wife have a billion house of a billion house of a billion house of a billion and daughters of Lopatin property for a billion coincidence? DON'T THINK
- Maryel (@maryel2002) December 15, 2015 It is not clear to someone why the Lopatins' partners-the Uzapki, could be completely impunity to kill and rape people in Kushchevka in completely impunity?
- Pavel Senko (@senko) December 15, 2015Olga Alekseevna Lopatina filed a court for the cocks and, for some reason, to the company of Google, demanding to prohibit the extension of her information about her connections with the families of tsapkov-chain.
It is very interesting why she did not sue the Unified State Register of Legal Entities, which so far regularly issues all information about this legal entity upon request “Arline”.
A method of universal reaction to any documentary evidence of corruption, theft and other disgraces has been presented.
- Your prosecutor is a thief!
- And what are your evidence?
- But the document!
- And we started a case about his fake!
And they run away, laughing loudly.
Brighter threw up three apartments, two cottages and a business jet for the grandson’s family.
There you can write an appeal in the TFR, Putin, etc. But it is a pity that it is impossible to write an appeal to Brower so that he also threw me wealth. For some reason, he only throws the prosecutor.
Tomorrow they will say that the wife of the Deputy Prosecutor's Proceedings five years ago entered Navalny’s tsapkov company, you will see. Well, or, at worst, Browner.
What is called: his hand is the lord! These, in order to get to be disgusted, will be rewritten, and not just the constituent documents of the LLC!
Zugzwang. Each move worsens the position on the board.
Let me remind you: this morning I sent a request to the UK about whether the wife (that is, the former) deputy prosecutor Olga Lopatin Business together with the tsapki waged. Only a monosyllabic answer was possible there: yes or not.
Instead, now urgently, in a day they have been starting the case on unknown people who forged documents on Lopatina’s participation in this business.
That is, you can imagine: the Dsapki was looking for whom to write down in the Social Academy of Medicine-and decided "And we will write down the wife (well, that is, the former) General Prosecutor." She is neither in spirit nor spirit. Thank you FBK, otherwise I would not have known further. http://zona.media/news/lopatinoy-net/
What turns out in the end: more attention is attracted to this story. Those who believe in the regime already write to me in the comments: yes, our foreign policy is beautiful, but something is wrong with the internal. We support and approve the request.
And the more the prosecutor’s office will be blessed, the more people will learn about it.
That's why I only asked about the trousers: you will not surprise anyone with corruption. And this is a resonance. And it is clear that it will be decided what to do with this will not in the UK, but in the Kremlin. Putin personally will decide. He also has a tsugzvang.
Save the Seagull and the company is to lose the rating. Testament 146 percent. It is impossible to go to this.
To pass the seagull and the company - to show “your own” that they came and their turn. Here are already half a step before the split of the elites with a snuffbox on the head. It is also impossible.
So - pull the time, and now it has accelerated. The years over the clock went against the background of oil 37 per barrel.
So - we are waiting. We look. Now the river itself, without our participation, takes out of the former swamps all the corpses hidden there. We sit on the shore and see - the first is floating, the second, third. Who will be taken out (to be taken out) tomorrow - it’s scary to imagine. But the movement cannot be stopped.
I’m trying to translate the phrase at least in any language: "In Russia, the ex-wife of the deputy prospector who led the business with the bandits sued the Google court for this."
Meanwhile, there is an opinion: Olga Lopatin really may not know about this company, and her name was simply used.
Well, that is, they are really very stupid.
With billions - but stupid.
Olga Lopatin says that a company with her tunes was recorded without her knowledge - and she does not lie. Not lying, and gives himself out with his head. Of course without her knowledge.
"Sugar of the Kuban" was supposed to master the "Investproekt" for $ 240 million. A large, serious project. Serious men sawed. Governor Tkachev was allocated money, Sergey Tsapok and Sergey Tsepovyaz sawed, the deputy prospector Lopatin and the deputy prospect of the Old Believers were roofed, 50%were received by the roof, all this was issued to the Arlene company, registered for wives. Of course, without their knowledge, who, stupid chicken, will ask them - they, prosecutors, serious men, are not accepted.
Even at the first familiarization with the materials, I thought that the aunts could well know anything about the unrealized plans of their husbands. They gave out a general power of attorney to whom they said - and forgot.
Meanwhile, RBC reports that the Kremlin developed their tactics for the fight against Navalny's investigation. The seagull is safe, but Navalny needs to prepare for the pressure:
The facts set forth on the Internet and the film do not invest, respond to a minimum, the FBK investigation itself is called the West order; The information set out in it should not affect the question of the seagulls reassignment at your post, and the campaign should be leaded against Navalny itself (both legal and informational). Such basic attitudes of the Kremlin about the investigation published by the FBK stated several interlocutors of RBC, close to the presidential administration, the State Duma leadership and the Federation Council, as well as in informed business circles. <...>
The actions have already begun. At the end of the week, the United Russia introduced a bill under which Navalny could not participate in the debates in the State Duma election, helping their associates: according to the bill, candidates should come to the debate personally, and representatives cannot do this. At the same time, Navalny, being convicted, cannot be a candidate himself.
Also on the weekend, the NTV project “New Russian Sensations” was published, dedicated to the former assistant to the editor -in -chief of “Echo of Moscow” Alexei Venediktov Lesa Ryabtseva. A noticeable part of 45-minute material was criticized by Navalny. In particular, Ryabtseva, referring to the words of his former boss, claimed that Navalny writes all investigations exclusively by order. Venediktov did not refute the statements of Ryabtseva.
Are you an official? Does the chair are staggering? Urgently carry the entire incriminating evidence to yourself in the FBK! After our publication, the re -approved in position is guaranteed!
- Leonid Volkov (@leonidvolkov) December 16, 2015
-
Ivan Belyaev
Social Networks Editor Radio Liberty