Good precedent

This has not yet happened: a German lawyer accuses the Russian correspondent of inciting interethnic razor. For this in Germany, you can get 5 years in prison

Ivan good on the air. According to German laws, he faces up to 5 years in prison, Germany, Berlin, January 16, 2016

An application for a crime in accordance with paragraph 130 of the Criminal Code of Germany submitted to the Berlin prosecutor's office on January 19, lawyer Martin Lutle. The “instrument of crime”, as he believes, was shown in the “Time” program on January 16, the report of the First Channel Sobrik in the Germany Ivan the Good from Berlin, which tells how three Arab refugees stole the 13-year-old girl Lisa from the family of Russian-speaking Germans and tortured her for more than a day.

What showed Channel One

The presenter Ekaterina Andreeva announced a report with anxiety in her voice: “There were evidence that migrants began to rape minor children in Germany, and citizens of the country talk about impunity and permissiveness for criminals.” Lisa’s native aunt in an interview with the correspondent said that on January 11, a foreigner, who looked like a native of the Middle East, took advantage of the gullibility of her niece, suggested bringing to school, actually brought to the apartment where one bed was standing, and within 30 hours, together with two friends, he mocked Lisa. After that, she, beaten and raped, was kicked out into the street. And now there is a frame in which the participants in the “spontaneous” rally of immigrants from Russia shout into the correspondent microphone that “they will meet violence” because the refugees “rape girls, children”.

The shots of the hacker group Anonymous were also included in the plot of Lisa: some type in a good German boasts, as in the past he and his friends mocked some girl. These personnel, as it turned out later, was six years ago. However, the first journalist confidently explains: the name of this “hero” is unknown, but it is already clear that this is one of the so -called new Germans and he was already integrated into the language environment. Be that as it may, the journalist is clear: what happened to Lisa is "not the only case." (By the way, picking up the news of a raped Russian girl, another channel, “Russia 24”, concluded that the “heroes” of the video Anonymous and there are those very rapists of Lisa).

The reports of Channel One and the news were sounded in the report of the First Channel: the police, it turns out, is covered by criminals, and social services can take revenge for the disclosure of facts in the press from their parents. In the conclusion of the good, the far -reaching conclusion concludes: “The atmosphere of fear and distrust of the authorities (in Germany) is such that there are no guarantees” that people, having learned on the video of the criminal, will call the police ...

What turned out to be

Of course, the plot was designed primarily for the Russian viewer. But a person in their right mind living in Germany could not but raise puzzled issues. Let's say, where does the recent refugee from the Middle East already have a car and rights, as well as an apartment, albeit rented? Both are simply excluded. Or: Why, having committed a terrible crime, the criminals let the victim home, without fear of being arrested immediately? And in general, how is it a German police, who, even if the child simply did not come to school, is immediately home to the schoolboy to clarify “where is the child”, does such a terrible crime close his eyes? On the basis of what legislative norm do German social services think of taking the child from parents? Finally, as in a matter of hours after the allegedly lost the girl it was possible to put professionally made leaflets throughout the area with an announcement of its disappearance?

"Between" Crucified Boy "and" Rapted Girl "there is a serious difference"

The famous German journalist Boris Wright Shuster draws attention to other meaningful details: Lisa’s parents turned out to be supporters of the Pegida anti -immigrant movement, her mother on social networks repeatedly called for refugees from Germany, and the “cousin” (the police now question the authenticity of the kinship of the two “cousins”) plays at the rallies of the right -handed party NPD.

On January 17, the representative of the Berlin police press service Kerstin Idmer made an official statement: “Based on the results of the investigation, there was no abduction or rape. Everything is absolute fiction. "

What's next

Most likely, the Channel One correspondent, shaking out a deliberate fake, was not afraid of either revelations or legal sanctions. And in vain. Because between another mythical generation of Channel One - a “crucified boy” - and a “raped girl” there is a serious difference. And it is that the first was in the territory controlled by the Russian femid and Russian propaganda. The second is in a space where a lie is still perceived not as a norm of life, but as obscenities and an insult to human dignity. And where citizens who respect themselves and their country calmly go to court, as the lawyer Lutle did.

By the way, German law enforcement practice has not yet known such a precedent. Typically, Russian propaganda is out of reach of German justice. But Lutle drew up a lawsuit on the basis that approximately 6 million Russian -speaking residents of Germany receive information from Russian television channels and the author of the plot works in Berlin. In addition, more than 1.3 million people, more than 28 thousand, shared a video with German subtitles on Facebook. They shared this plot, almost 3.5 thousand evil comments were published in social networks - all this is confident in Lutla, in fact, the hatred of refugees, and also provokes violence and illegal measures against the personality. For such a crime under German laws, imprisonment of 3 months to 5 years is provided.

Photo: YouTube.com