Enemies without people

Arab-Israeli negotiations. Leonid Volkov, obviously not wanting that, found amazingly accurate words. One of the leaders of Parnassus, he only wanted to say, and said that “even there sometimes manages to agree,” that is, to the Arabs with Jews, but in reality he formulated the principle of the eternal improperness of Russian democrats-Levocentrists with lawyer democrats. They can establish some fragile relations and conclude unreliable unions, but they never become real allies. They are too different, like Jews and Arabs.

Despite the fact that the science of all of them, Arabs and Jews, calls the Semites and outwardly they are terribly similar when without kufi, araftok and kip, but they do not know how to be friends, even kill. So it happened historically. The Middle East is the Middle East, and they do not converge together.

Theoretically, if you develop a metaphor, it is interesting to understand who we have. For example, is the "apple" is Arabs, or vice versa? However, biblical cruelty in discussions about parliamentary lists and a single candidate in the presidential election is characteristic of both parties, so confusion occurs immediately. And lasts longer than a quarter of a century, and in the dispute of the non -alternative Yavlinsky with collective Chubais there are already so many copies and so many hopes have been lost that it was already remembered about the Israeli, as well as the Arab military. The main thing is not visible.

Today it looks like this.

In September, the elections to the Duma, on which, taking into account the current circumstances, both Yabloko and Parnassus, which are strictly opposed to the external and domestic political course of the Kremlin, the authorities consider the authorities as enemies. In extreme cases - through the slot of the Kadyrovsky sight. It would seem what to argue about, we must unite. However, the controversy inside the democratic camp is consecrated by many years of tradition, which is why new showdowns are perceived as inevitability. There is no other way.

At first, the high contracting parties identify each other, and it turns out that the Yablons see “competitors” in the partners, and they do not want to compete with them, wanting to achieve an agreement on the coordination of the Duma campaign. A little later, the formal leader of Yabloko, Emilia Slabunova, reports that the union with Parnas is possible, but only if the right -centers support Yavlinsky in the presidential election. In response, Ilya Yashin very much offers to the place to remove his Duma list - then, they say, Parnassus could support Grigory Alekseevich in 2018. Hearing this, the indignant Slabunova, of course, declares that there will be no cooperation at all, after which Mikhail Kasyanov informs everyone who is interested, that Yashin was joking. True, few are capable of evaluating the few, and Lev Schlosberg, delegated to the “Yabloko” for negotiations with Parnassus, is desperately appealing to both sides: stop exchanging “compliments”! .. In such an atmosphere, our Camp-David dialogue begins, about the further course of which you can guess, thinking woefully about the past.

At the same time, it cannot be said that we are talking exclusively about the whims of politicians or about personal accounts that vengeful Arabs are doomed to reduce with vindictive Israelis. There are disagreements that reluctantly can be recognized as serious. The non -alternative Yavlinsky, not without reason, blames the collective Chubais that Putin's phenomenon became a natural consequence of the successful construction of gang capitalism in Russia and discrediting liberal ideas. Collective Chubais, not without reason, denounces the non -alternative Yavlinsky in snobbery and total inconsistency.

However, all these implacable disagreements against the background of what is happening in the country are, as it were, to say, optional. After all, they finished off the mice, repeating the sad path of the Social Democrats, Communists and others in that Germany where weakness, fragmentation, infantility of anti-fascist parties was crowned with the trouble of planetary scale. And there is no Chubais for a long time. There is nothing at all, and in essence, it does not matter politically, the democrats with the Democrats will unite or the joy of Volodin will again fight. What is probably facilitated by provocateurs introduced in both parties. You can only talk about the moral meaning of the Yabloko Union with Parnassus, but this is not an empty conversation.

In the end, the pre-election plot does not at all come to ensure that at least one of the polemists manages to break into the Duma. On party lists or in single -mandate districts. Churov will be considered Churov or who will be appointed Churov there, and the times in the yard are such that state -forming media as the news of the day submit a letter from an excited “political scientist” calling for the abolition of the elections. And in this situation, literally the weight of gold, the skill, having settled down, negotiate at least a few normal people who remain in the country engaged in politics.

Enriched with the experience of the crushing defeat, they could simply declare a joint confrontation of power today. Firmly knowing what their perennial irresponsible squabbles lead to, the leaders of Yabloko and Parnassus could sign a real agreement on mutual support. Then go to the current agenda, remembering that until 2018 it is still far away and it is too early to think about the nomination of anyone in the president. I am sure that for millions of people who have been rushing between the DVR and "Yabloko", ATP and "Yabloko" for decades, and now they have longed for the next fencing tournament in the country where fencers are already shooting in the center of the capital, concluded between Parnassus and "Apple", the political union would become good news. The only good news, but unexpected, that is, just sensational.

Unlike Middle Eastern news, which in the coming years, decades and centuries promise little good and seven and anti -Semites, which, however, are also Semites. But this is a completely different region, where in principle any agreements do not mean anything, and during the endless negotiation process of the only democratic state with the partners surrounding it, one can even grab the Nobel Prize of the world, nor on an iot without approaching the goal. There is geography against people, that is, the regret arrangement on the map of the states incompatible with each other. In this sense, everything is not so launched for us, although there are also problems with geography, but no one canceled the other, and strongly encouraging cyclicality of the development of domestic history. Therefore, the democrats in Russia do not need to focus on Jews and Arabs.