
This is a personal blog. The text could be written in the interests of the author or third parties. The 7x7 editors are not involved in its creation and may not share the author’s opinion. The registration of blogs on 7x7 is open for authors of various views.
Another mistake about the impartiality of the UN reminded me of what was annoying from childhood: a Soviet person understands impartiality, objectivity and justice in a strictly defined way: when others share their benefits and rights with him, the courts make decisions in his favor, and the peoples conquered by him smile at him, press his hand, and sit with him at the table, thumping vodka, as if it had happened. This is for a Soviet man - freedom, equality and brotherhood.
Well, if he has no position. If he has a position, then justice and impartiality are immediately in the secretary, a free dacha in Kratovo and a black official car.
If you take away and divide, then, of course, - someone else, this is honest. If you take to take and divide, then he immediately sits in writing his personal “Ivan Denisovich”, make films about Sharikov, and so on.
Or blocks the highways, because he has a currency loan, or now complains of the UN.
At least once a Soviet man went out on a wide road, and said - "Guys, here I was wrong, sorry, it turned out, I haped the excess, here I offended you in a breath, let me return, and make you make it possible for the sake of winning justice and peace all over the world."