"Novosibirsk deserve their kehman"

Public figure Alexander Rudnitsky in a polemic manner summed up the hearing about the fate of the Novosibirsk Opera and Ballet Theater, noting that the “moral meaning” of Vladimir Kekhman’s victory “in the absence of opponents” is close to zero, and activists actually approved “censorship” over the “tangiazer”.

Taiga.info publishes the text of the head of the Novosibirsk branch of the Memorial with minor seizures of personal estimates and recalls that the author’s opinion may not coincide with the opinion of the editorial office.

When organizing

public hearings

On February 4, the initiative group, believing that “no one wants confrontation,” tried to “understand what is happening in the theater and overcome the unacceptable alienation of people from the theater”. NGATOIB Director Vladimir Kekhman acted quite adequately: he spoke a lot of compliments on repertoire policy, asked to tell the chief conductor Dmitria Yurovsky about her, who had nothing to do with the scandal with Tangayzer, and his inconvenient issues went around and spoke about the remarkable prospects of the theater.

However, the Tangazer persecutors, which make up the vast majority of the participants in the hearings, instead of discussing the excellent future, decided to finish both the Tangazer and the former director of the theater Boris Mezdrich, who was given the word once and at the end. Since the brilliant victory of Kekhman's supporters at the hearing on February 4 was won in the absence of opponents, its political and moral meaning is close to zero.

Having an extremely conservative taste, in music I understand the level of the "teapot". He grew up and graduated from the University in the International Tashkent, where national intolerance in any form was impossible among decent people. My father is a Jew, so I was discouraged to find that the arrogance and cynicism of Vladimir Kekhman causes me nausea with signs of anti -Semitism. Therefore, not considering myself an expert, and even more than an interested expert, I did not go to the hearing, but I want to share my impressions from the retelling of the hearings,

published

site taiga.info.

Kehman could not hide surprise when he saw a draft resolution, pre -compiled by a member of the Public Chamber and deputy of the Novosibirsk City Council Natalya Pinus and ready to sign, although the hearings only began.

On behalf of the initiators of the hearing, the doctor of sociological sciences Konstantin Antonov assured that “no one wants confrontation, we want to understand what is happening in the theater. The alienation of people from the theater is unacceptable. ” They believed, without sufficient reasons, that the authority of the Public Chamber would overcome the painful disunity between the supporters and persecutors of the Tannhaiser, but did not invite supporters to simplify the procedure. As a result of the hearing on February 4, they turned into a continuation (in another composition) of a rally on March 29, 2015, blessed by Metropolitan Tikhon.

Instead of discussing the successes and prospects of the theater, the participants in the hearing of habit joined in a fight on the side of the strong

Overcoming the alienation of Antonov began

In the Soviet way

: “I did not know Madzrich and did not watch Tangayzer, but the processes were alerted, these rallies were unacceptable.” But as a journalist, he knew that neither the investigation nor the Orthodox activists found any among the three thousand spectators present at the premiere of Tangaiser, whose Christian feelings were offended. On the contrary, both performances ended with a standing standing of the audience, including the Orthodox. The court did not find the composition of the offenses in this statement.

A rally on March 29, 2015, a thousand people, with the support of Metropolitan Tikhon, was organized by the head of the Novosibirsk People’s Cathedral Yuri Zadoy, chronically preoccupied with the fall of the morality of Novosibirsk. Probably, in this capacity, he was invited to hearings

(who exactly and in what capacity invited him is unknown, the announcement was addressed to everyone - approx. Taigi.info)

. About five thousand Novosibirsk residents went to the rally on April 5, 2015, protesting against censorship, interference in the creative life of religious fanatics and officials, against a special operation with a criminal shower with the complicity of the Russian Orthodox Church, the Novosibirsk Prosecutor's Office and Minister of Culture of the Russian Federation Vladimir Medinsky, as a result of which Kekhman was appointed director of the theater.

Having started the reconciliation of the parties, Natalya Pinus proposed a draft resolution - in fact, the indulgence of Kekhman on behalf of the Public Chamber. At the hearing, she raised the main and only question about a free bus on behalf of the audience of the audience. Kekhman reasonably invited her (as a deputy) to solve this issue in the City Council.

Instead of discussing the existing successes and the rainbow prospects of the theater, the participants in the habit of joining the fight on the side of the strong and began to “wet” the nationwide performance with his rallies and the unrequited Boris Mazhrich, “leaving the theater in this position” (he must understand, he escaped!), For a crippled dome, a collapsing facade, not working, not working

Scientific and technical

Tip ... Moreover, if Kekhman had the opportunity to answer all complaints and praise, then Madrich received a word for a replica once at the end of the meeting.

The public was not interested in Kekhman’s recognition that funds are invested in repairs without a project and in violation of the law

The majority turned out to be confident that claims to Kekhman are disproportionate that he should be supported. Professor Alexander Shaposhnikov was satisfied. Oleg Viktorovich suggested Kekhman to support, if only he arrived in Novosibirsk. He likes everything that Kekhman says and does. A

Vice Speaker

Anatoly Kurbanov, the Novosibirsk Legislative Assembly, the chief in the field of just Russians, believes that Kekhman, having attracted "money from the federal budget, without a doubt, makes a serious contribution to the development and retention of our regional culture with you."

The fact of the censorship of the Tangazer was actually approved by Antonov, Yuri Zadoy, Kubanov and co -chair of the Novosibirsk branch of the ONF Nikolai Fomichev. So far, President Putin doubts the rationality of the input of censorship in Russia in violation of paragraph 5 of Art. 29 of the Constitution of the Russian Federation, Kubanov without hesitation suggested the Public Chamber to expand censorship for “Red Torch”, Muzcomedia and the Circus. For the participants in the hearings, this wonderful idea did not cause objections.

[ "These people are not even from a past life"

] (https://tayga.info/125518)

Fomichev, carried away, promised Kekhman: "Return the name ... and we will love you all!" (We are talking about replacing the new brand invented by St. Petersburg businessmen to the old reduction of Ngatoib). Nikolai Gavrilovich [Fomichev] is a honored doctor of Russia, a professor and a wonderful organizer of science, but here the taste summed up him. I am not talking about too emotional, in my opinion, for a person such a high rank by assessing the setting of “tangaiser”, but “everything” is a strange word. At least one person in the hall - Mezdrich - will never love Kekhman.

I, together with five thousand participants in the rally

(Rudnitsky assessment - approx. Taiga.info)

April 5th, too, Kekhman will not love. I am sure that Kekhman is rational as a person and does not claim to be universal love. And he will not pay a penny for her. As for the name of the Novosibirsk Theater, both the old and the new divide the first place in the world as the ugly name of the famous theater - the fruit of bureaucratic fantasy.

Kekhman showed himself a brilliant polemist. He did not skimp on compliments: “He did not meet a more beautiful public either in Moscow or in St. Petersburg”, “I believe that we are a unique platform in Russia”, “The theater is the pride and symbol of Russia, and not just Novosibirsk”, “Novosibirsk is an absolutely outstanding place”, “I saw the love of the Siberians for the theater, I did not expect this theater,“ I think this theater is the most beautiful in the most beautiful thing. Russia ". And already just like Khlestakov: "Three years later, this theater will be the Federal Theater No. 2 in Russia in all respects - economic, political, creative."

Three years later, it will be possible to admit that Kekhman received a collapsed provincial Ngatoib, and only thanks to his merits in the city is there a famous new world in the city

Kekhman asked about the repertoire of the theater to tell Yurovsky, who had nothing to do with the censorship of the Tangiar. He recalled the elderly fans of the theater that in half a century the situation has changed a lot in the country, the theater, and the return to free performances is impossible. He explained the conditions of economic activity by the change in proportions in the production of ballets and operas.

As is now accepted, Kekhman is proud that he was brought up on the street from 10 years old. This tough school brings up strong characters and criminal habits that are almost impossible to overcome.

Kekhman prudently evaded answers to questions about the impact on his directorship activities of personal bankruptcy, criminal prosecution and violation of the legislation on cultural inheritance objects, noting that he was ready to answer before the Caesar, but "not caught - not a thief."

Against the background of this general support, the facts recognized by Kekhman were uninteresting that funds are invested in major repairs without a project and in violation of the legislation on cultural heritage sites. The lack of a project allows you to operate more freely by means attracted from the state budget, but Kubanov has no reason to doubt the crystal honesty of a person whose bankruptcy is considered by the court.

Since the brilliant victory of Kekhman's supporters at the hearing on February 4 was won in the absence of opponents, its political and moral meaning is close to zero. But he got the opportunity to trump the results of the hearings, for example, before Medinsky - it is not difficult to deceive him

(Formally, the hearings did not have “results” - approx. Taiga.info)

.

And three years later, if during this time Kekhman is not condemned, the Public Chamber of the Novosibirsk Region will be able to convene new hearings and adopt a resolution that Kekhman received a practically diluted provincial Ngatoib, and only thanks to his merits in the city there is a famous new world, not the second, of course, in Russia, but not the last.

I would recommend to the Public Chamber, without putting it off in a long box, to instruct Natalia Pinus to prepare a draft of this resolution. I have no doubt, everything will work out!

Alexander Rudnitsky, especially for Taiga.info