The prospects of the new "Russian" revolution

This is a personal blog. The text could be written in the interests of the author or third parties. The 7x7 editors are not involved in its creation and may not share the author’s opinion. The registration of blogs on 7x7 is open for authors of various views.

Russia is a decrepit state. It dies. The Bolsheviks began to understand this. According to evil irony, the Bolsheviks are anti-state-owned,- delayed the death of this state, but the state of the Bolsheviks is not Russia and initially not the state. The Bolsheviks created communist societies on the territory of the former Russian Empire, and were forced to unite in the Union, against the chalks of the capitalist states that had threatened them, surrounding them. This described factor, as well as the “clutter” of the proletariat with a backward peasantry (by collective farms) and the intelligent blog, deviations from the principles of destruction of the state, led to the death of the USSR. When members of the CPSU became ardent statesmen, then the USSR fell.

The current situation of Russia is very critical. The power in the Kremlin is extremely stupid, short -sighted and incapable people. Inside the country, these non -melodies created nothing but a bulky and ineffective apparatus of “employees”. The calculation for the creation of a "new nobility" is extremely stupid and flawed. These “new nobles” will not “put your heads” behind the “king”. The time is not that and the contingent is not the same. In bureaucracy, all stripes, there are all “adaptants”, there are virtually not smart and useful ones. It is no secret that the services go for money, benefits and other charms, in the absence of all this they will scatter.

The economy of the Russian Federation resembles a futuristic landscape from the novel in the genre of anti -utopia. One gets the impression, as if there was some kind of super -cyvivation earlier, and now, after some kind of cataclysm, a degrading society, uses the benefits of the past, without inventing and not creating anything new. In Russia, really, there are no: heavy industry and mechanical engineering, agriculture and food industry, and education is destroyed “from above”, in the hope of making “dark” and uneducated people from Russian citizens. It’s easier to manage. Penarting infrastructure, in general, “parable in the tongue”, the plot for jokes and Pasquili. The Russian economy has been developing unevenly for a long time. The regions, at times, are less economically developed than Moscow and Peter, where more significant financial, industrial and trade resources are concentrated, and thus an unfavorable balance in the field of state economics has developed. It is worth adding here that few people notice today, namely, the fact that in the substitution of Soviet syncretism the Putin Kremlin did not laid the foundations of civil unity of the inhabitants, but, coupled with the social and economic inequality between the capitals and the province, the weakness of the law, the extremely brainless management, both in the center and by the locations, foreign -political failures in masses, fear Non-Russian peoples before the advancing Russian fascism, all this leads to a break in the connections between individual provinces, where, for example, the desire of the local business elite to use the benefits of their region is really felt, and not give the “lion” fraction of the Muscovites.

Foreign policy has continuous miscalculations and a series of failures. Putin's attempt to create a semblance of the USSR failed. Members of the Evrazes began to scatter as soon as the “smell of fried”, a drop in oil prices, sanctions and threats of the United States and the West. BRICS? None of the participants in this organization perceives this organization seriously except Putin himself. It is ridiculous to observe enthusiastic exclamations, “recent with the mind”, “quilted jackets” about “friendship” with China. China “sleeps and sees” how it settles in the east of the Urals, if the rulers of China did not think so, and would not make plans to use the current situation with the Russian Federation, then the “Grief-price” would be such rulers. It is much more profitable for the rulers of the PRC to agree with the United States on the division of Siberia and the Far East than to confront with the Yankees because of the little Taibay. An attempt to conquer Georgia failed. The fleet of imperialists from NATO, which for the first time in history entered the waters of the Black Sea, stopped Putin's expansion. The capture of Ukraine failed. Calculation for the "ally" Lukashenko and volunteers of the so -called “Russian Spring” did not materialize (in ISIS from Russia there are volunteers hundreds of times more). Instead, the Russians received hatred and boycott of the whole world, the Putin state was in isolation. The development of “shale” technologies, sanctions and political isolation, coupled with the “betrayal of the allies” slowly but surely leading the Putin empire by the “X” one ...

So Russia is on the verge of revolution. What do we have on the communist flank? In the Russian Federation, a couple of thousand communists are unlikely to get. Most of which are infected with chauvinism. Most of us are crushed and does not see the prospects for the arrival of the dictatorship of the proletariat, based on the events on the Maidan and Putin’s popularity in the working environment. Many people begin to echo the Kremlin’s propaganda about some superpowers of the special services that consist entirely of the “spidermen”, “Batmen”, agents 007 and which “manipulate” the revolutionary masses. There is a probability of repeating the mistakes of the Ukrainian left and communists (this does not apply to the Communist Party, the last analogue of the Putin Communist Party of large industrialists and the motley public who joined them, consisting of cats, sorcerers, priests, adventurers and declassified elements). The mistake of the Ukrainian Communists is that they turned out to be short -sighted and did not see the anti -colonial essence of the Ukrainian revolution. "Maidan" is a reaction to Putin's imperialism and neocolonialism of Russian capital. As for the special services, their role in the revolutionary process is minimal and exaggerated by the media to please the same Russian imperialism and fascism.

The revolution is not subject to people- this is the regularity of the development of society. Regarding the proletariat and its “blind” faith in the “priest -king” - I advise you not to build illusions about this, because these are the speculation of intellectuals that have always been distinguished by an idealistic warehouse of the mind. The worker is not an ideas, he is more realistic in understanding being. His vital wisdom tells him that “the thin world, better than war”, and this is the right point of view ... Until for the time being, until his proletarian interest is affected, which is actually much more important for him than national interests. Believe me that soon the worker will forget that he is Russian and will remember that he is a proletariat.

Lenin wrote that the revolutionary situation would arise in the presence of two factors, namely, when “the tops cannot” and “the bottoms do not want”. So, if there is a “top,” there is no fact that “the lower classes do not want”, but they will “want” because of a sharp exacerbation “above the usual needs and disasters of the oppressed classes and their desire for changes in their life for the better.” Given the official data of the “Kremlin” statistics of the fall in industrial production, this “ridge” of the economy, up to 20%, this “desire” is not far off, and even the Kremlin understands this.

The first stage of the revolution will occur when, due to the ignorance of the masses, the Putin elite will change the “other” elite. This is natural. This is a classic of a revolution.

As for Muscovy, at that time you will not be up to her at all. I can only notice that with such a percentage of the population of the Muscovy and the Communists, radical fascists, or Nazis will win and take power there.

We should be afraid of the future demand for the Volga society in the Nationalists of local peoples living in the Volga region, who can “gain points” for future, anti -colonial moods of the peoples of the region. It is especially worth being afraid of the energetic Pantyurkists, they will be in demand by regional oil and gas magnates who will finance them. This is what they should understand today and try not to overlook, and not repeat the mistakes of “others”.

Regarding the Volga communist movement, I can say that at least in the territory of the so -called. Bulgaria (Kirov region, Mari El, Tatarstan, Chuvashia, Udmurtia, Bashkiria, Ulyanovsk region), we still observe that for all the "variety" of the names of communist cells and even some consumption in views, there is a rather strong backbone to create a strong and powerful in the Bolshevik party. And this party will be, and will be created in conditions of hot struggle, and this is natural.

* The material is mentioned in the organization ISIS, whose activity is prohibited in the Russian Federation