Are I glad that our Crimea is?

Almost all surveys of seven are absolutely incorrect from the point of view of sociology, are strictly propaganda. But we live in a free country, so this is the right of the editorial office to do everything that will please her. My right, in turn, cannot be delighted about this.

This survey was no exception to the rules. Not limited to the provocative formulation of the question, the author also loaded it with prompts like: “ Are you glad to pay for the Crimea?”, “Are you ready to tighten your belts and how much?” . Kindergarten, sorry.

- Am I glad that Ukraine has lost Crimea?

- No, this is a completely terrible situation. It would be infinitely better if there was no armed coup in the country, and Crimea remained in Ukraine.

- Do I respect the choice of Crimeans?

- Yes. According to the German, extremely correct study of the authoritative GFK Group, more 90 percent of Crimeans are happy to reunite with Russia.

I well remember how the departure of Crimea took place. Until February 26, 2014, the protests there were little different from those that occurred in many other cities of the southeast. Everything changed dramatically after 13 thousand Tatars and Ukrainian nationalists attacked Crimeans, outraged by what was happening in the capital. As a result of this attack, which took place under the three types of flags - the Tatar, Ukrainian and "Right Sector" ( an extremist organization banned in the Russian Federation - ed.) , A woman - Valentina Danilovna Koreneva was crushed, another man could not stand the heart, all of people were injured.

It became a point of no return. The next day, the cities were decorated with Russian flags and the Crimean spring began. Here it is necessary to explain that Crimea was pro -Russian and ten and fifty years ago, or rather it was just Russian. Khrushchev gave it to Ukraine, as they were given once or lost to the cards of the village with the peasants. But as long as Russia and Ukraine in parts of one whole, it did not matter much. However, the more Ukraine moved away from Russia, the less it had hopes to keep Crimea behind him. Many people secretly, who openly rejoiced at the departure of the peninsula. Their opinion was voiced by the representative of the Lviv thought Ostap Drozdov:

" The loss of Crimea is wonderful. We finally got rid of the moronic fifth column with unfinished Russian grandmothers that voted for Putin. And when they were in Ukraine, we voted only for the part of the regions and repulsed, frozen communists. Finally, we do not have two million complete inadequates who will always spoil Ukraine and pull Ukraine to the bottom."

Nothing new, all this has been pronounced thousands of times since the 90s, and after 2004 it became a common place. And no one was indignant, chuckled. And not only it was said, Crimea was financed worse than any other region of the country, because no one in Kyiv believed especially that he would be able to preserve it.

So the situation was very ambiguous. At the same time, Dzhemilev relied on anti -Russian forces in Ukraine. He was told a hundred times that this leads to stress, that you need to have wisdom in order to get along where you settled. But he stubbornly contrasted the Tatars to the rest of the peninsula that led to countless skirmishes, conflicts, and fears that the Tatars could blow up the situation. As a result, at a critical moment, in February 2014, Dzhemilev, more closely, turned out to be close to getting power over the Crimea, and then everything turned out, like the brother of the old Hottabych. The moon refused to rotate around him. The demonstration of the Majlis Tatars of its strength forced Crimea to rush into the embrace of Russia already, like from fire. To reunite Crimea with Russia, Dzhemilev and Ukrainian nationalists made a hundred times more than Aksenov and his entire brethren.

I will add that not at all “polite people” brought the peninsula, Ukraine to this situation. Our progressively gifted, in view of complete legal cynicism, has not yet given any assessment of the coup. They have a propaganda picture on this score, at the comics level, but there is completely no understanding of what happened. And it happened that half of Ukraine - euro -oriented, by force seized power in order to pushing the second half.

It’s like if one of the two runners in the final pulled out a crowbar and drove the second along the knee. For some reason, it seemed to him that half of the fans at the stadium had to come, and would reconcile. They could come to terms if everything was at least relatively honest. But the coup, where the Naziks and various morons with Molotov cocktails were most visible, is not quite sporty. We all observe and reap the results. And how much is not Tryndi that if it weren’t for Putin, the genetic slaves from the Crimea and Donbass would not have disappeared, they reconciled, the very fact that half the country has forced to wipe off some earplugs in balaclavas and scum from “Freedom”, makes it doubt that the problem is only in Putin.

* The material mentioned an organization whose activities are prohibited in the Russian Federation