
The Investigative Committee is considered fair to the Ukrainian pilot Nadezhda Savchenko. As TASS reports , the representative of the department Vladimir Markin stated this. "I believe that 22 years is enough for a person to change his mind and improve, maybe," he said.
According to Markin, he suggested that the verdict would be tough. “I did not know what the verdict would be. I understood that it should be severe for such crimes,” Markin said.
According to his assessment, the lawyers and supporters turned the trial of Savchenko into the show. "We saw dances, dancing, hunger strikes, dry and half -dry. Moreover, at the same time, the person looked amazing. Blood with milk. This is all funny," said the representative of the UK. According to him, the investigation collected sufficient evidence for Savchenko of the conviction.
"Savchenko’s behavior in court is the quintessence of what is happening today in Ukraine. We needed to make this court public so that everyone saw not only what Savchenko himself is, but also those who support her - her lawyers. This is also the quintessence of what this audience, which protects the Maidan authorities," Markin noted .
According to the representative of the UK, the department is now investigating more than 60 criminal cases on events in Ukraine. "About 62 criminal cases have been instituted in Ukraine, 45 of them were connected in one proceeding, and 15 in independent," he said.
Markin said that criminal cases have been instituted against persons who called for terrorist attacks and riots in Russia.
On Tuesday, the Board of the Donetsk City Court of the Rostov Region sentenced Savchenko to 22 years in colony . As the lawyer Nikolai Polozov said after the court’s meeting, after the sentence entered into force, the convict intends to resume a dry hunger strike.
Later it became known that Ukraine will put on the international wanted list and begin in absentia condemnation of judges and prosecutors involved in Savchenko’s sentencing. This was stated by the prosecutor of the Prosecutor General of Ukraine Vladislav Kutsenko.
According to him, the first business was initiated under Part 2 of Art. 375 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine (the adoption by a judge (judges) of a deliberately unlawful sentence, decision, ruling or decision). The defendants in this case are judges Leonid Stepanenko Leonid, Ali Khaibulaev and Evgeny Chernysh.
The second case "is connected with the prosecutors of the Prosecutor General of the Russian Federation." The case was opened under Part 2 of Art. 372 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine ("illegal prosecution of a person to criminal liability").