Translated material
The representative of the Russian Foreign Ministry Maria Zakharova entered into poetic correspondence with Dmitry Bykov
The writer Dmitry Bykov ambiguously appreciated the poetic efforts of the official representative of the Russian Foreign Ministry, Maria Zakharova, who, on the eve of March 30, entered into poetic correspondence with him. Dmitry Bykov answered Maria Zakharova to her message, encrypting in verses an assessment of her poetic talent with the help of a quote from Pushkin: "And the sonorous Arena of the Foreign Ministry / in sacred horror is a poet."
Dmitry Bykov’s poem “I can’t restrain my emotions ...”, which gave the start of a poetic poetic poetic, was published on March 30 on the website “Orthodox.ru” and ended with the words:
"We are well protected
From your sanctions unhealthy
And we will spend within the country
Championship of Dvorovy teams.
So the wheel turned:
Glamorous for a view -
Aida in the yard! Dvorovo all:
War, culture, speaker of the Foreign Ministry. "
The poem was written based on the participation of the participation on March 27 of the Minister of Defense of Russia Sergey Shoigu, the Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov and the chairman of the Supreme Council of the United Russia party Boris Gryzlov in the presentation of the Folk Football League.
This poem was responded with the official representative of the Foreign Ministry, Maria Zakharova, recently sung in the song of Pierre Narcissus "Maria - Aquamarin, Maria - Adrenaline."
Zakharova said that she read Bykov’s poem “Morning” on March 30 and on the same day at 10:23 Placed a poetic response in her Facebook in six quatrains:
The yard style was set by you.
And we? We will not shine with anything.
Only for convenience understanding
We are talking in the yard.
Who needs Hesse delights?
After all, there is no one to play with beads with.
Now for forest orderlies
We began to compose Virschi.
From the blogs we learned them
There are many consumables, and
We were inhaleed from words from words,
Having said to himself the cherished "Burn!"
Hearing the words of acquaintances sound,
Everyone who could,
And the flock of evil flies
In our linguistic lesson.
Well ... this wonderful picture
We observe every day.
You are not doing to the point of the world
And you are not lazy to discuss the style.
The ugly style is not needed for you -
We tell them with the people.
The yard fusion is ready for you,
Not straining minds.
Zakharova’s poem suddenly liked Facebook users, collecting 10,000 likes. “There are a lot of plagiarism, if you noticed: Pushkin, Mayakovsky, Gaft, Hesse,” Zakharova listed reminiscence from the classics in her poem.
Bykov answered this message on the website of the "interlocutor" :
Write poetry for a diplomat -
Recall that the Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrovwrites poetry and does not hide it: his works have been published more than once. Bykov noted that "loves the elegance of the polemic," and he praised Zakharova’s poems ambiguously ("your verse is stretched by a bowstring"). The poem ends like this:
We will not shine, ”you post us, languishing with a flirty guilt. No, you shine, you shine! Blink like no one else!
Your syllable and the type of competitors in Russia, and the sonorous harp of the Foreign Ministry heshes ....................................
Instead of the last line, which should be rhyme with “no”, an ellipsis was set, however, in the last stanza, a quote from the “stances” of Alexander Pushkin, written in response to Metropolitan Filaret, who entered the poetry in response to the poem “The gift in vain, the gift of the Bykovsky response, refers to the end of“ Stans ” Pushkin addressed to Filaret: “And the Arfima / in sacred horror, the poet” heeds (these two verses were invited by Bykov as an epigraph to his response).
Bykov said the Radio Station “Says Moscow” said that Maria Zakharova’s poem poorly understood the meaning of the poem: “I can’t claim that I really deeply understood her poem. As far as I managed to understand from your reading, her poems are made in the genre of the so -called suggestive lyrics, when the reader himself must guess about the essence. There is no that clarity that is in my poetry messages. The representative of the Foreign Ministry should not speak so that his words can be interpreted as much as possible, the main message of Maria Zakharova is that we do not deserve another language.
“Brodsky also said that the task of poetry is the most grateful. She brings a little more harmony to the world. If I brought a little more harmony to Maria Zakharov, forcing her to speak with poems, and besides, there is a wonderful rhyme“ I need fusion ”, it proves that I once ennobled reality once again,” added Bykov.
At the same time, Bykov was glad that the representative of the Foreign Ministry switched to verses: “I am always glad when a person under the influence of my opuses suddenly speaks with poems. It is very pleasant when the tone of the current Foreign Ministry, frankly, is sometimes not quite diplomatic, is replaced by such mannerism,” the BBC Russian service quotes.
Stanislav Belkovsky: Zakharova will soon "be able to state his position at briefings in verses"
Political scientist Stanislav Belkovsky in the program "personally of your" at the Radio Station "Echo of Moscow" stated about this poetic competition that Maria Zakharova once again showed herself to be a man of art. According to him, this was noticeable earlier at her briefings.
"Maria Zakharova is generally very artistic. I watched a lot of her briefings, and it is clear that this is not a standard briefing of a representative of the diplomatic department. This is, you know how they read a fable, for example, or some excerpt from the" poor Lisa "Karamzina. Here are the briefings of Maria Zakharova in the following stylistics:" gentlemen, animals, you animals, you are animals, you are animals, you animals Gentlemen! ”She often admits such powerful lyrical digressions addressed to the audience of rhetorical questions:“ To be or not to be? ”,“ Are you crazy? ” - she loves to say. You see, it can be seen that, of course, Maria Zakharova is an art man, and the framework of the Midovsky Mundyr is somewhat crowded. Maybe she will be able to state her position on briefings, I am in poems, I can do this. I'm waiting, ”said Belkovsky.
“The fact that Maria Zakharova is either an failed poet, or the failed actor,” I would say that yet, I have not yet been held, I don’t refuse her the possibility of realizing in this field - this is certainly so. And it seems to me that in general the curtains need to be hung in the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, so that he opens when Maria Zakharova appeared so that there is some kind of musical design of her performances so that she does not act so that she did not act Lugged, ”added a political scientist.
Zakharova’s poem was analyzed by the poet and critic Leo Oborin
According to the critic, the traditional form of works of both authors is emphasized that before us is a stylization for poetic messages characteristic of past centuries. "Modern poetry knows many other methods of utterance, but it is obvious that they are unacceptable here, because it will not be possible to stylize the message to diplomatic etiquette."
Leo Oborin lowly appreciated the poetic technique of the representative of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs: “If we talk about the form of the poetic speech of Zakharova, then it refers precisely to the rhythmic school. This is a four -foot iambic with female and male clause and cross rhyme. This meter is still associated with the Pushkin’s poetry. It should be noted that Zakharova can not withstand him in the fifth of the fifth The stanza is suddenly shot down by male clasulas, that is, where the stressed syllable ends the stanza, and hesitating the “picture” and “peace” can, of course, only the amateur and “understanding”.
The substantive side of the poem by Zakharova, according to Okorin, “represents some mystery”: “This is an enigmatical poem. It answers Bykov to his attack that the current leadership adheres to the courtyard style, within the framework of the traditional controversy“ Yes, we are doing this. Well, what? "We really are explained by the courtyard style, as Zakharova would say, but at the same time we have saved this style for you - for those who, apparently, consider themselves the conscience of the nation or" orderly of the forest ", as they say in the poem. That is, for those who are more important than the essence of activity, but the style of activity that she writes about in the last stanza. But at the same time, we recall, the famous Dissy Andrey, the famous Disissy Andrey. Sinavsky said that he has purely stylistic disagreements with the Soviet government, of course, legitimate, they should not be dismissed from the claims to something non-essential.
"The use of the word" fusion "the department recognizes that its stylistics is extremely eclectic and includes non -parliamentary expressions, and the traditional chancellery, which usually explain all the departments of the country. This is exactly what was very distorted by the Foreign Ministry in recent months, starting with the Ukrainian campaign. The last stanza of this poem is unconditionally, but I would say that I would say that I would say that I would say that I would say that I would say that Bykov’s poetic culture is much better.