
The Kirovo-Chepetsk District Court of the Kirov region refused the parole, the Euromaidan, Alexander Kostenko, contained in the IK-5 of the general regime in the district center. This was announced on his FB page by the lawyer of the politicalese Dmitry Sotnikov.
The motivating part of the decision has not yet been prepared, so the lawyer did not set out the reasons for the refusal. He, however, assured that the decision would be appealed in any case.
When considering a petition submitted to Sotnikov, the representative of IK-5 admitted that Kostenko was not employed only because there were no free places in the colony. The FSINovets also could neither confirm nor refute the statement of the political prisoner that he was mastering a working profession in the colony.
To explain why the Maidanovets is put on preventive accounting as a person “studying, propagandizing, professing or spreading extremist ideology,” the representative of the colony also found it difficult.
Finally, the Fsinovets did not specify the specific motives of the penalties imposed on the political prisoner. Kostenko’s sending to the schizo , about which Sotnikov announced the day before, the security officer explained by the fact that the prisoner seemed to be repeatedly not greeted by the colony employee. Meanwhile, the lawyer regarded the actions of the jailers as a provocation in order to disrupt the Udo Politzek.
Kostenko himself participated in a meeting on the video from IK-5.
The General Consul of Ukraine arrived in Moscow Gennady Breskalenko. He also intends to visit the colony and meet with Kostenko and three more Ukrainian hostages contained there: Viktor Sklikov, Vladislav Burlaka and Grigory Larionov.
Larionova, Sotnikov added, the FSINITS sent to a schizo, as well as before the last arrival of Breskalenko. “Apparently, the IR employees like this procedure so much that they decided to introduce Kostenko to her,” the lawyer quarreled.
On May 15, 2015, the judge of the Russian Kiev District Court of Simferopol Viktor Mozheleansky sentenced Kostenko to 4 years 2 months of a general regime under paragraph “b” of part 2 of article 115 (intentional infliction of mild to health or enmity against any social group) and part 1 of Article 222 of the Russian Criminal Code (illegal storage of weapons). On August 26, the College of the Russian Supreme Court of Crimea (Judge -Rosaiser - Sergey Togrebnyak) reduced the Maidanovsets up to 3 years 11 months . On February 24, 2016, the Presidium of the same court (Judge-Rosaiser-Viktor Vasiliev), excluding from the prosecution to the political prisoner under the 222th article qualifying signs of wearing and acquiring the main parts of weapons, reduced his term for another five months.
The courts of all instances considered proven that in February 2014, on Grushevsky Street in Kyiv, the activist threw a stone at the Crimean Berkutovsets Vitaly Polienko, from which a bruise was formed on his hand, and that Kostenko kept a homemade rifled trunk of Makarov’s pistol at home. Politzek himself refused to admit the guilt.
On February 5-6, 2015, immediately after the detention of the FSB in Simferopol, Kostenko received a fracture of his hand. In torture, operatives Major Andrei Tishenin and Captain Arthur Shambazov participated in torture. The belated operation, carried out after the sentence, did not help after the fracture three months after the fracture, however, until sending in the autumn to IK-5 in further medical care, the politicalese was refused.
On March 21, Sotnikov said that the FSINS doctors are imposing a new operation on his hand , but the political prisoner himself fears medical procedures in the colony and insists on hospitalization in a civilian hospital.