Translated material
Khabena and villainous power
The network discuss whether it is worth "going to bow" to Putin for the sake of sick children
On the weekend, the echo of Putin’s “direct line” of Putin rolled on the network-they discussed Konstantin Khabensky and Avdoty Smirnov, whose issues were concerned to the president, but not working laws: they still do not take close to the patients, autists are still not taken to schools. In addition, Khabensky recalled that a year ago, Putin promised to resolve the issue of providing seriously ill children with artificial respiration apparatus at home on a “direct line”.
Most commentators of the performances of Khabensky and Smirnova aroused admiration:
Dear cynics reading my tape. You are always sure that not a single person takes a single public step without a selfish plan (a reminder of himself, dividends in a public space, promotion through a career ladder, sawing possible budgets and any other cunning bonuses that come into your heads). Here is an example for you when it is absolutely obvious that this person is not interested in anything like this. He is just an ordinary hero of our time. It should be equal to him. I am proud of Kostya Khabensky.
Conducted very Khabensky and Smirnova Avdotya - not a word about himself loved ones, not a word about the theater and cinema. Only about sick children. I bow.
Well, here we have reached Putin with our autism. I do not know what over -cosmic humane power is driven by Avdoty Smirnov, but this woman needs to erect a monument during life.
Khabensky. A worthy man asked dignity and listened with dignity. Still, TV is a X -ray character
It seemed to others that there was something mocking in all this:
When I found out that actor Konstantin Khabensky and the playwright Avdotya Smirnov turned to Putin for help, I presented a picture for myself - on the direct line of Barack Obama and the American people, Angelina Jolie and Nicholas Cage addressed him with tearful requests, or there Nicole Kidman and Leo Dee Caprio. Like in American maternity hospitals to children, parents are not allowed into intensive care, and autists are not allowed into schools ...
Gloom, comrades! Full darkness!
He broke in Khabensky, seeing in the tape. Included. Wound up, tortured, pale Khabensky, carefully choosing words, reminds of last year's promise to put all the Ille apparatuses to all needy children. To breathe children. So that at home they lie, with dads and mothers, and not in the state ward. It resembles admission in intensive care. And dutifully, poor fellow, listens in response to false Galicia. Like, exaggerate and rejoice at what is. Only the face twitches.
I think - if by some miracle I was the opportunity to be there, in front of the cameras. Some, for example, pests would miss there. Washington hawks. Masonic backstage. I would have enough gunpowder, opening a mouth for a specific question, say, about shit instead of drugs in cancer departments, to ask: "Vladimir Vladimirovich, why did you build a system in which people are forced to beg about elementary things that are normally solved by professionals." After all, it is clear that asking a question about medicines and strollers is still pointless. How pointlessly a year ago he asked Khabensky about the devices of Ivl. So at least take away the soul. In the same place, half of those present I want to do this. Even, perhaps, just obscene a benefactor into a lean face.
How wildly they are all sorry.
What a hopeless longing. Khabensky and Avdotya Smirnov tried, but essentially did not answer #straightforwards
- Gennadius (@geburnash) April 14, 2016
Why even such a person as Khabensky, whose team does so much, gets some kind of set of empty words instead of answers ?? It's a pity.
- Inna Lobanova (@inna_lo) April 14, 2016
Some commentators criticized Khabensky and Smirnov for “having to bow” to power, which does not fulfill its duties. They remembered, of course, Chulpan Khamatov, who once starred in Putin’s campaign video in return to help sick children.
All these requests for the king-priest extend his existence. ("The fifth, dented, saved Chulpan Khamatov ..." The hellish paradox.) From Khabensky, he needed a named named, and not the question of Khabensky. And therefore it is bad that Khabensky asked, "tried."
Come and participate in this circus - legitimize evil and banditry.
There is such an annual game in our country - "Ask the good king for something." - direct perpendicular line.)) Very well staged.
If an adult plays it, then two conclusions are suggested:
1. He is an idiot.
2. He is a player (on the other hand - "Speech"). Either voluntary or forced.
Both roles are boring and vulgar.
If you come with a question to Putin and a request, then you are waiting for an answer and recognize his right to rectify the situation, and most importantly, you believe in it. If they asked, following the example of Maria Solovenko (sitting down by Masha -SPASIBO VOVA), adding "there is no need to answer the question" - they say everything is clear, then all this noise would not have been. For example, you promised this and this, nor the hell is done, I do not believe you, you are deceiving, etc. (Khabensky). Or the laws have been adopted, neither a fig they work, you do not cope with your work. Also as an option. And here again we see how the king-priest is being beaten by a petition .. Well, who does it touch? Well, who believes that something to improve? .. An empty shocking of air. The only plus Putin was that famous people showed that they believe in him and his "effectiveness".
Others do not blame Khabensky, but they urge you to think about how far it can start cooperation with a rotten system.
And the question is really difficult, where, on the one hand, Khabensky and Ivl, and on the other, is the literary festival of Turchak "And Cho, to refuse, or something"
A muddy place about cooperation with the state begins where the legal requirement of the exhausted Khabensky is turning into a prayer addressed to a person who has been irremovable and not fired for 17 years.
I do not consider Konstantin a traitor, of course. He carries the most difficult cross, like Chulpan. It’s just that Putin created a state where the executive branch should be carefully begged and carefully asked for years.
But there is an opinion that there is nothing shameful in interaction with the authorities, especially when it comes to saving lives:
The idea of the denial of the state as a structure with which it is possible to interact, if necessary, it seems to me deafening.
Lord, why am I sitting? I am also not alien to me. Should I, with contempt, throw my passport in the face of bloody public services? Do not need your handouts! To disrupt state numbers from a personal car, trample the diploma and compulsory medical insurance policy. In a word, somehow completely dissociate, so that you can’t tarnish yourself anywhere.
No, I am exaggerating, of course. I am ready to admit that everything is more complicated. But the question is serious - so let them explain the rules! At what line of interaction with the state does the betrayal of ideals begin? Say, is the ZhEK already a damned regime or not yet? Is it ashamed to light up on the threshold of the passport office? It is also incomprehensible with the registry offices: will I marry or do we go like that? Where is the line for which a decent person cannot be interceded? Is it possible to write statements to the council, is it worth taking risks a reputation and calling the traffic police?
Or everything is possible - the traffic police, and the courts, and even vile registry offices, can not only be contacted by the president?
Such situations will arise as much as the human race exists. I poorly understand how, in relation to Khabensky, you can make claims related to conscience and dignity. Did he seek help to the unclean power of the dile of villainous power? Was it necessary to whom? To the Virgin Mary and the warriors of Light? Or not at all, so as not to tarnish white clothes? After all, it is not about theatrik, not about orchestric, not about personal benefits. About the lives of real children. And if the Virgin Mary is not enough for the salvation of all lives, then you need to ask the Lysye devil. I would also ask the devil to save, for example, my child. And the least at this moment I would have thought about her honor and the immortal soul. And Khabensky is not asking for his own. And the Soviet surgeon Amosov generally did not believe in immortality. And he was not an anti -Soviet, and did nothing to fall the bloody regime, of which he was. Just to a very old age, he operated on, pulling out people from the other world. Thousands of saved on his Soviet conscience. And if there is a kingdom of heaven, in which he did not believe, he is probably there.
It is important to learn to live and do things in the conditions in which you live. Ignoring, confrontation and resistance, possibly, methods, but not in all areas they work. What now you can’t teach children and patients not to treat if it is necessary to interact with the authorities? Sorry.
Alas, the interaction does not bear fruit - too often requests simply do not work, other commentators say:
Probably, you need to learn how to live without waiting for anything good from power, and especially from this crafty president. This will be a useful skill and an adult attitude to reality.
It is much easier to say than to do when it comes to the protection of patients - whether children, adults. It is impossible to do without a state, it is simply impossible ... And the walkers go to the king, overcoming nausea or, worse, nourishing illusions. But you need to give a report that these illusions have a high price.
To ask King Herod of protection and compassion for children and the universal is not immoral, but simply ineffective. Tsar Herod does not care about the children and the illustous. But we will once again fall to your feet, reliably, because although there is no use from previous falls, we still have no other ideas.
In fact, to the question of Khabensky, Putin answered so that many have no doubt: to ask for useless.
One of Putin’s most stupid answers on this straight line. But everything is clear about the system. They discuss for a long time about palm oil, and about human life - they pour water, instead of specific answers.
Why, this one answer to the question of resuscitation should make people not support such a state leader. Only cynics can now achieve the result (or at least a profitable and acceptable answer) in Russia. There is no manual management in the country, including manual. The double is more blessed than the Soviet. Who managed to ate. If Che, we will reassure (C) and other Putin's aphorisms in the topic ...
The commentators were especially outraged by that part of the answer where Putin said that there was no money in the budget to provide children with Ivl apparatuses.
@Stalingulag $ 12 million per violin is, but 12,000 for the device for the IVL. Well, yes, you won’t play it in the Kremlin’s concert Zade
- Shtadler Anton (@zloi_toni) April 14, 2016
Putin said: there are no means for artificial respiration for children who need them.
Think about it.
At the Olympiads, parades - there are means.
On the Crimean - there are funds.
There are funds for the barbaric ugliness of Moscow.
For fees for cellists in the amount of $ 2 billion - there are funds.
And much more.
And on artificial respiration devices (cost 1 million rubles) - no.
If this is not cynicism, then what is cynicism?
I believe that Sergei Roldugin could instead of the Stradivarus violins to buy a hundred thousand Ivl devices.
Kostya is a hammer, but he said “A”, but he could not say “B”, namely, on the insignificant bleating “There is no money”, Kostya had to say - “So take Panama’s musician”. 2.5 thousand in a million each it is 2.5 billion or 36 million dollars. This money, a certain sand, wears on his hand in the form of a watch and gives a certain Navka on the hats.
I understand - you will go to the hell to the hell for sick children. Only the devil usually gives. That is, he will deceive, of course, but then. And first, for the soul gives a good price. The devil does not have such a habit of not paying for the soul. And our ghoul has no money for the tanker. There is a war, but there is no Ivl for sick children. The meaning of him to carry the soul?
Again ... you, Khabensky, choose - ventilation of the lungs for children or the 18th -century cello for Putin's friend. Do not confuse the shores.
- Anton Kochetkov (@k0chetkov) April 14, 2016
The network also reminds that last year’s instructions of the president were never fulfilled. In the article “ Breathe-do not breathe: how the President of Russia tried to help seriously ill people. And why did he not succeed “ Katerina Gordeeva talks about the background of the issue and what changed after the “Direct Line” -2015 (short: nothing).
We knew very well that a year ago Nyuta [Federmeser] already made a question about Ivl and received a seemingly positive answer. And that two years ago the question of resuscitation sounded, ”says Alena Meshkova, director of the Konstantin Khabensky Foundation. - We knew that the questions were asked, the answers were obtained, but, in fact, nothing changed: in the same way, I had to “resolve” the stories with the opportunity to visit sick children, just the same way no one bought a single IVL apparatus for the state account for a year. And we decided to repeat the questions. This is in the interests of the charitable community so that systemic problems are solved faster and more efficiently. And here the answer is that there is no money, we, of course, did not expect. They thought the process would start and this initiative would be implemented, you just need to push it again, but it turned out differently. ”
Thousands of people shared a complete hopelessness of Nyuta Federmeser , entitled by the “Direct Line Crooked” on Facebook.
We heard in response that there was no money. This is an answer that there is absolutely nothing to object to. There is no money - well, what can you do.
But in fact, the stay of a child at home for IVL is seven times cheaper than in intensive care. <...>
This topic is inseparably connected with the issue of admission to intensive care. Not only is palliative children locked in intensive care, tied to the devices of the Ivl - they also let mothers for an hour a day, and then not always. This is a reality in which hundreds of families are forced to live today in different regions. We know many cases when the children were dying behind the resuscitation doors, and their parents did not let their parents. And adults are also very scary to die alone. And no internal regulations of the hospital or lack of space in can be an excuse for this.
In short, the point here is not in money and not in laws, but in indifference.
All these tasks - the provision of 2.5 thousand patients with Ivl apparatuses, admission to intensive care, and the development of field aid - are economically unnecessary for the budget, even in a crisis. Especially against the background of some other expenses produced at the expense of our taxes.
To solve this today, only indifference and political will need. There was no will today. So there will be no instructions.
And this, ultimately, determines everything, says the poet Anna Starobinets :
For me, the main criterion by which you can judge the country and its leadership is how the country relates its weak. Not to crooks and thieves, not to the militias of Donbass and the Patriots of Ukraine, not to Pindos and Syrians, to the weak. Own. Who lie in intensive care and breathe through a tube.
No highly spirituality, no collegiality and no Russian spring have any meaning if you cannot come to your child and husband, who are connected to the Ivl and breathe through the tube. "Russian Spring" here will begin when to the one who answers questions will reach the fact that the Khabensky question is the most important question.
-
Alya Ponomareva
Social Networks Editor Radio Liberty