Former best but disgraced

Mom is sorry.

I mean the mother of Strelkov-Girkin, to whom some “visits” came to St. Petersburg and questioned her in the murder case. Igor Ivanovich is allegedly involved in them. And if everything was so, that is, people were killed, Girkin was suspected and mom interrogated, then we should not only talk about pity. You should also talk about lawlessness connected to a secret.

The lawlessness consisted in the fact that a close relative of the suspect had the right to refuse to answer any questions related to a criminal case. This is a constitutional norm. Judging by what Strelkov writes , the “police officers” did not notify his mother about the right to silence, she was scared and gave them “written testimonies”, partly a convicted nature. She said that "at the time of the crime was committed), she did not see" at the time of the crime). Girkin is outraged, in the actions of the authorities he seeks and does not find the limits of human meanness, and he can be understood.

It is not entirely clear much more. Who was killed and what does Igor Ivanovich have to do with it. Why the mother was interrogated, and he walks still under -sided. And what is happening at all.

As for the prosecution, there are at least two versions. Strelkov sets out the one according to which he "killed 2 people in St. Petersburg and an appropriate application received me." The St. Petersburg Fontanka has other information . Four dead, and crimes were committed in Slavyansk. At the same time, it cannot be said that the suspect in principle is not able to kill anyone. This would mean to severely slander the hero. Rather, the number of victims causes distrust. For the same Girkin, who "pressed the trigger of the war" in the Donbass, is large -scale murderer.

However, his image, inspirer and participant in mass killings, is becoming more and more contradictory every year.

On the one hand, the trigger and all that. On the other hand, it was Strelkov who was one of the first to get out of Ukraine and after, as if spreading his hands and finding traitors in the Kremlin, urged the militants to follow his example. On the one hand, he branded Putin himself for a conspiracy with the fascist Kyiv junta. On the other hand, he praised and supported Putin, which was exhausted in the fight against the West, and promised him active assistance in eliminating the fifth column in Moscow. On the one hand, rumor attributed to Girkin the rank of Colonel of the FSB and often he behaved like a real Gabi colonel. On the other hand, he fiercely and tirelessly reproached and continues to scourge Vladislav Surkov, as if disagreed, and not a Chekist-state. In addition, Igor Ivanovich is vanity, and when he breaks through the whole truth about the return of Crimea to his native harbor patriotic and noticeably dumbfounded from such revelations, he looks like a direct traitor to his homeland.

Girkin’s recent return to politics as part of the “Committee of January 25” also gives rise to issues. It is generally accepted that the heroes of the "Russian Spring" are attendants to the Kremlin, and this is perhaps the truth. A private patriotic initiative often causes no less irritation among the authorities than protests in the liberal environment. Moreover, when it comes to things sacred, such as war with Ukraine. Strelkov and such forerunners and mountains of Novorossiya were confused for too long under their feet, so as not to be honored with special, intense, unkind attention to themselves from the authorities. And if you can never put Savchenko for anything, then why, for the real killings, for example, Igor Ivanovich cannot be repressed in Slavyansk?

Double benefit. The world public demonstrates the objectivity of our punitive bodies and ships. And local indifferent citizens will serve as an important reminder that extremism in Russia is persecuted by law, regardless of form and content. Well, yes, Igor Strelkov-Girkin is difficult to blame for the CIA as an agent of Friedom, and we are not planted for the service in the FSB yet. But there is an article, for example, 105, part 2 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation.

There would be an extremist, Femis anyway to say for, she is blind.

Moreover, this plot is not necessary to tie this plot to the external policy. On the contrary, the well -known hybridness of this policy may be reduced to the fact that Girkin will be attracted and condemned, and his ancient dream, the resumption of the active phase of interference in the internal affairs of Ukraine, will be implemented. Under the leadership of Putin, Surkov and others hated by him, which he stigmatizes in a shame on his blog, calling them in every way and amazed at the baseness of his tormentors.

Although what is there to be amazed. Surgency of loved ones is our usual law enforcement technique. Whether he does not know.

This is a tradition, which did not even begin under the Communists and God news when it is interrupted. Yes, and Igor Ivanovich himself, the author and main character of the sensational " Facular adventures ", a former terrorist, a civilian massacre reconstructor with his old-fashioned antennae, doesn’t it look like that sadist-Belarusian from the Soviet film, who is reproaching the colonel shocked by his cruelty: "Sometimes I doubt whether you had a mother." It turns out that it was and is, and it really is a pity.