Housing rights and high gentlemen

In the morning of May 18, 2016, we decided to bother the high gentlemen from the White House with a reminder of their low housing rights, to draw the attention of the inhabitants of this institution to the fact that people have certain problems, and the problems are urgent, requiring solutions.

Only we started to gather - law enforcement officers came up. At first, law enforcement officers told us that our action was not agreed. Surprised. Personally, I was very surprised, because I knew very well that we could not agree on us, we did not submit to the coordination due to the complete futility of such a lesson in this place.

We explained to law enforcement officers that we are going to put single pickets, which is not prohibited by law.

Then law enforcement officers first stated that we must comply with the distance established by law between the picketers. Then, if there are more than one picketers, even at the distance established by law, we will be detained, because it will no longer be a single picket. Then they stated that I, as the organizer of the action, should go on the bus and fill out all the documents.

I was very surprised, because I have never heard of such legal procedures necessary during the pickets. I suggested talking on the spot (at the same time starting a video of a strange discussion). Law enforcement officers said that the documents are a whole kipa and you can get acquainted with them only on the bus.

Struck by this suddenly arising legal phenomenon, I began to try to find out what kind of strange documents are, but here the law enforcement officers ended in patience, and they began to drag me towards the bus.

For the first time, thanks to the active life position of the residents of the hostels, it was not possible to drag far away, the second attempt was more successful.

Further, as the author of the material managed to observe the bus from the window, most of the protesters lined up in front of the bus, chanting: "Let our comrade!"

In addition, a single picket was still organized. Elena Gavrilina, a resident of the house at ul. The Caspian d. 30, stood up with the poster “Prosecutor's Office, the RF IC of the Russian Federation, not wanting to protect, dragging 12 years. Help an extraordinary to get housing laid down by law! ”

10 minutes after Gavrilin turned the poster, the police detained her (I emphasize, after she turned the poster! Do not look for a reasonable explanation for this. He is not here!). Then they began to delay already wholesale.

Sergey Bitsa (revolutionary working party), Elena Sidorenkova (the correspondent of the newspaper “Working Democracy”, during the detention was video recruiting), Alexander Savalsky (member of the Union of Journalists of Russia), as well as residents of hostels: Elena Gavrilina, Maria Kolesova (Bolotnikovskaya St. 2), Svetlana Kolybelnikova were put into the police boxes. (Trekhgoren Val d. 14, building 3).

The police carefully escorted the remaining residents. Residents of the hostels of the Trekhogorka (dormitory data are located near the Government House) directly to their doors.

In the Presnensky police department, we were held for about three hours, then released. Explanatory ones took only from two, the protocols did not issue for anyone. Apparently, it was quite difficult to explain to the legal language-why was we still detained.

Well, in the Code of Administrative Offenses, the articles “Barrow look irritated”, at least not yet.

Maybe they will introduce over time.

It is clear that the circus that had happened did not repel from the residents of the hostels the desire to fight for his rights. It is difficult to deprive a person to protect the roof over his head. Now we are discussing the next protest.

****

We understand that tall gentlemen from the White House with their high thoughts about the geopolitical fate of the country, with their huge reserves of real estate in the territory of Western countries (apparently purchased in order to ridicule the geopolitical enemy in its enemy den) will seem ridiculous. But still they were forced to disturb high gentlemen, for we have no other way out.

The fact is that part of the buildings of hostels is illegal, contrary to the Decree of the President of Russia dated 10.01.93 of the number 8 (stating that the facilities of the Housing Fund and the housing and maintenance and construction units of enterprises and organizations cannot be included “in the privatized property”), as well as a number of other legislative acts, were owned by various private firms and other legal entities. This, for example, is a hostel at the address of the Trekhgoren shaft of d.2 p. 1 (and other former dormitories of the Trekhgorenaya Manufactory), the dormitory of the Nogin factory (Sheremetyevskaya d. 9 Corps 3), the hostel at the Stavropol village of 17, the dormitory of Russian Railways in the Ugrysh passage and many others.

It should be noted that article 18 of the Law “On the privatization of the housing stock in the Russian Federation” states that the guys who privatized the enterprise cannot drag with them, as a dowry, also a housing fund belonging to this enterprise. I quote: “In the transition of state or municipal enterprises, institutions to a different form of ownership or during their liquidation, the housing fund located in the economic management of enterprises or the operational management of institutions should be transferred to the economic management or operational management of the successors of these enterprises, institutions (if they are determined) or to the maintenance of the local authorities of the settlements in the prescribed manner in the prescribed manner in the established procedure, in the prescribed manner of preservation of all Housing rights of citizens, including the right to privatize residential premises, "I emphasize," while preserving all the housing rights of citizens, including the right to privatize residential premises. "

However, the owners acquire hostel buildings not in order to endure people in them. Let these people under the law should retain housing rights.

They try to get rid of the residents in a variety of ways - arson, disconnecting light and water, attempts to evict force, setting protection (not letting relatives and guests to residents). All this is absolutely illegal. Everything falls under various articles of the Criminal Code.

None of the above no one was prosecuted. The maximum that the authorities and supervisory authorities do is forcing the entrepreneur to stop or suspend disgrace.

And even that, only when the scandal around the bullying becomes public and bright.

It should be especially noted that although under housing legislation all houses are subject to transfer to the municipal housing stock, the city periodically refuses to accept residential buildings. As this happens, for example, with dormitories on the 16th Parkovaya 3, Avenue of Budyonny, 16, Stavropolskaya d. 17. No, real estate to municipal officials, of course, is needed. But only if it is cleaned with the residents before that.

People are massively removed from the queue to improve housing conditions, as happened with the residents of the houses at the addresses: Pleshcheeva D.15, a, b; Aminevskoye Shosse, d. 13; Bolotnikovskaya d. 11 K. 2; Yaroslavskoye highway d.136; Suburban highway D 6; 4th park d. 25; 7th Parkovaya d. 15, 19, 21, 21, a, 25, 47; Izmailovsky Boulevard, d.15; Derbenevskaya St. d. 14 K. 5; Vvedensky d. 2, 3, 4, 15 K. 5; Borisovskaya d. 16, Sevastopol passage d 5; Nagornaya d. 5 K. 2; Aviamotornaya d. 6; Kashirskoye Shosse d. 11, d. 13 to 2; Ryazan Avenue D 5; 50 years of October, 2, building 1; Nagornaya, 5 K. 2 - and with residents of many other houses.

This simple manipulation occurs by illegally attributed housing, actually occupied by the inhabitant of the hostel, areas of corridors and public stairs. With the tenant, they conclude a social rental agreement not only on the room in which he lives, but also on a piece of the corridor in front of her. As a result, it turns out that the tenant of the hostel is quite provided with housing according to the norm of provision (has more than 18 square meters per person).

This practice is illegal, since it is rudely contradicting part 2 of Article 63 of the LCD, in accordance with it, the "typical social rental contract for the dwelling is concluded for isolated dwelling." I emphasize, "for isolated dwelling." Isolated residential premises is an apartment. An isolated residential premises is a room in a hostel. A piece of common -use corridor or public ladders (they are also attributed to them also) is not included in the isolated residential premises. Actually, when dormitories were put on the line for improving housing conditions, no one believed that pieces of corridors next to their rooms were their living space. City officials decided to think so only when they decided that there were too many people standing in line to improve housing conditions. And it would be necessary to suck this amount. Preferably to zero.

It should be noted that people, blessed by the area of corridors and stairs,, in addition to the loss of space in the queue for housing, also receive the growth of communal tariffs.

Housing officials illegally deprive the right to resettle residents of dilapidated houses, including at the addresses: 4th Parkovaya d. 25; 7th Parkovaya d. 15, 19, 21, 21a, 25, 47; Izmailovsky Boulevard d.15, 1st Grainonovsky passage d. 7, 9, 9 a. There is no need to additionally explain that living in these houses directly threatens the health of residents.

Until now, the inhabitants of the house on the street have not received housing. Kamova d. 26. And this house can no longer be called dilapidated. It cannot be called a house, only a ruin (it should be noted that the house was destroyed by fire in circumstances that make him think about deliberate arson in order to evict residents).