Translated material
Down with convention
The FSIN asks to change the leader of the progress party to Alexei Navalny as a conditional punishment in the "postal case" for the real for "systematic violations". This was reported by the politician himself.
"Yes, and how can I not demand my landing? The misconduct, committed conventionally convicted by Navalny, are heavy and dangerous. I went on vacation to Karelia, so on the day when I had to celebrate (July 7), a lawyer came to my inspection that I was on vacation in Karelia, therefore I can celebrate on July 11 (which happened). What is the scandal! The case (for 2.5 years), when I was celebrated for a day or two later, providing a certificate that I was on vacation, ”Navalny writes.
According to politician Vadim Kobzev, on August 1, the FSIN will consider the Lublin District Court of Moscow. "The branch number 11 of the penal inspection sent a submission to the Lublin District Court, in which he asks to cancel the conditional punishment to Alexei Navalny and replace it for a real term," the lawyer said.
On December 30, 2014, the judge of the Zamoskvoretsky district court of Moscow Elena Korobchenkosentenced the brothers Navalny in the "postal case". Navalny Sr. received 3 and a half years conditionally with a three -year trial period, and his brother - the same real term.
In October 2015, the Lublin District Court refused to renew the ongoing trial period for the "postal case". The FSIN justified his petition that Navalny did not come to the criminal-executive inspection on the due day and was late for a day. The politician explained that that day he was resting in Gelendzhik with his family. "I was late for a maximum of 12 hours, flew the next day and immediately went to mark, brought tickets to the inspection. I think that this is not the basis for extending my trial period," Navalny said.
On December 4, the Lublin District Court of Moscow again rejected the submission of the penal inspection on the extension of the Navalny test period for a month. According to lawyer Vadim Kobzev, the reason for applying to the court was that Navalny was twice at the inspection not at the appointed date, but a day later. "The court considered the violations indicated by the inspection unsystematic and insignificant," the lawyer said. On January 19, the Moscow City Court rejected the prosecutor’s protest to the decision of the Lublin District Court.
On May 13, 2015, the judge of the Lublinsky District Court of Moscow Oksana Zaretskaya extended to Navalny a trial period in the Kirovles case for another 3 months - up to 5 and a half years ( 
At the same time, Zaretskaya rejected another performance of the Federal Penitentiary Service - on the replacement of a conditional deadline in the Kirovles case to the real. The prison department stated that Navalny violated the regime of serving conditional sentence when in February he distributed leaflets to the “Anti -Crisis Marsh“ Vesna ”in the capital's metro, for which he was detained and arrested for 15 days. A year earlier, it was noted in the representation, Navalny was also arrested for 7 days for participation in the“ popular gathering ”in support of swamp prisoners.
“Navalny really committed two administrative offenses,” the judge said. “At the same time, he observed his duties and did not deviate from control. There was a gap of about a year between administrative offenses.”