Nooscope is generally what is it?

Analysis of the scientific article that the new head of the presidential administration could write

On August 12, Anton Vaino was appointed the new head of the presidential administration. Little is known from the official biography of the official - but users of social networks have discovered scientific articles about the relationships of space, time and protocol written by a person with the same name. Medusa read these articles and tried to understand what they were talking about.

Official Anton Eduardovich Vaino and researcher Anton Eduardovich Vaino is this one and the same person?

Unknown. The official and researcher completely coincide the surname, name and patronymic. Moreover, in official sources there are no references to the scientific degree that the official Anton Weino possesses. In addition, there are no references to his connections with the RSUSU, where the researcher with this name was listed as an applicant, or with the MGU, where he eventually defended his dissertation.

There are indirect evidence that may indicate that a weed-chin and a weed-research is one and the same person. So, it is known that Anton Antonovich Kobyakov , the supervisor of Anton Vaino, who defended the dissertation at the MGUU, was working in the presidential administration in 2005-2012, and in 2012-2014 in the presidential office. Official Anton Vaino in 2004-2007 and after 2012 worked in the presidential administration, first in the protocol-organizational administration, and then-deputy head of the Kremlin administration. In addition, together with Kobyakov, the Wey-Resident registered patents for his inventions.

The Kremlin’s press service has not yet commented on the scientific work of Anton Vaino.

What is the work of Anton Vaino “Capitalization of the Future”, which is quoted by the media and users of social networks?

It is very difficult to say. Medusa studied this article Anton Vaino (and one more, which is called “global uncertainty”), but it is not possible to retell it. The text is full of science statements like the following: “The transition of space during, and time into space is the border or face of the unknown, it is a mixing layer of time and space, which carries different information”; “EXTRACTIONAL Control is a system of systems that includes: a visualization system for foresight; a network system uniting a pre -trial with a policy process; And the feedback system. " The author formulated the scientific hypothesis of his article as follows: “The management of the market is determined by the protocol dictating the optimal ratios in a single whole-space-time-life-and establishing the rules of the game and the laws of the market.” There are no attempts to prove this hypothesis in the article.

The author of the publication "Capitalization of the Future" neglects the standards of citation, which are adopted in the scientific world. The notes to the article include only links to Vaino's past works and to the work of his co -author Viktor Saraev. The text itself contains the mention of scientists and simply famous people who lived in different eras and engaged in various types of activities: physicist Werner Geisenberg, mathematics Kurt Gedel, economist Ernando de Soto, sociologist Max Weber, as well as adviser to US Vice President Albert Gorah Fyurt and Jordge Soros (he The article is presented as a “practitioner philosopher”).

According to the Associate Professor of the Institute of Public Sciences of the RANEPA Ekaterina Shulman, “such articles are needed only for one thing - to recruit the right number of publications to defend the dissertation; Such texts the author usually doesn’t write, but even does not even read. ”

What is the device that the nooscope that Wino writes about?

The nooscope mentioned in the Wino article “Capitalization of the Future” is a “device that records changes in the noosphere” or, in the simple way, a means for collecting and analyzing a large amount of data. Judging by the publications, this apparatus is the real development of Glovers, whose president is Vaino Viktor Sarayev (what kind of company is it, it is unknown; it does not have an official site). Nooscope, the article says, is based on the principle of “Russian nesting dolls” and knows how to analyze data from different levels - for example, data on the behavior of players in financial markets, about the number of food, about technological disasters and the collective consciousness of mankind. Whether there is a working prototype of a nooscope is unknown.

The Vaino article also refers to similar technologies created in the USA and Europe (this is almost the only piece of publication written in a clear language without unnecessary science; and it is about real, but not yet implemented projects). In the USA, the Planetary Skin platform project is being developed, which will collect and analyze the data about the environment; This will allow "to effectively manage such natural resources as biomass, water, earth and energy." The European Union develops the Living Earth Simulator project, “which will combine information about natural phenomena and environmental features,” the article says.

Is this an original scientific work or not?

In the scientific articles of Weino, some borrowings were discovered. Thus, the thesis that was dispersed on social networks that “there are no ways to prove, that is, it is logical to substantiate that the world around us, familiar to us, is familiar to us by ear and touch, it really exists, and not just in our imagination,” is found in the preface to the Russian edition of the book “Biology of the sensory systems” of Chris Smith. The author of the preface is the candidate of biological sciences Oleg Orlov, but there is no link to his work in the scientific article by Anton Vaino.

Another example is borrowing the phrase “Several different geometries <...> are equally well consistent with observant data on the structure of space”, which is in the 2012 Wino article “Capitalization of the Future”. It is found in the preface to the Russian publication of the book of Morris Klein “Mathematics. The loss of certainty ”of 1984, the author of the preface is the doctor of the physical and mathematical sciences Isaac Yaglom.

Finally, the 2012 Wainegalization article “Capitalization of the Future” contains signs of self -cycling: text fragments identical to the text of the article of 2011 “Global Uncertainty”, as well as a large number of links to Vaino's past work (15 out of 22 links found in the text; other links - to the work of the co -author of Vaino Viktor Saraev).