Cultural prescriptions

What happened to Russian society over 25 years without the USSR? Sociologist, editor -in -chief of the magazine "Cinema Art" Daniil Dondury - about protophydric models, free market, atomic project, semantic traps and disasters of ideology.

-If you recall the events of the August days of the 91st year from the optics of an imaginary documentary, which shows large masses, how would you describe it? How does it look sociologically and statistically?

- As you know, in the days of the putsch for all rallies in Moscow - for everything! - One million people came. The remaining nine (or, without children, seven million) heard something. They went to work. They watched the Swan Lake on TV, saw this press conference of the GKChP. They said something to them, etc., etc. But nothing more. That is, always in Russia everything does a very small number of people. Throughout its history, large groups have never committed anything serious, they did not commit any October Revolution. 30 people arrived in a filled car, as they say, and turned the country, gave it another ideology, another state model, another economy, another political and all other systems.

This is always the confrontation of small elites, so it was in the 91st. In connection with Yeltsin, before this, up to 500 thousand on Manezhnaya Square, when Yeltsin was elected, but this was another story related to Russia. It was not connected with weapons, with the troops, with the putty, with the revolution, later with the collapse of the country, with new economic types of orders. So, these are not very large groups of the population. These, of course, are elites. This applies to famous events on Presnya around the White House, and all these rallies, and confrontations. This also applies to the confrontations of 1991 and 1993.

Your browser does not support HTML5

Daniil Dondury 2

- Is it possible to assume that the zero and tenth years inherit the nineties, and if so, then how?

-Modern gigantic fear, meaningful, semantic, is due to the fact that the model that existed between 1993 and about 2012 is exhausted. And therefore, here the choice - or Russia unfolds again into protofeudal options associated with the fact that the market is governing the state, the state runs vessels, the state decides what degree of freedom should be in a person, the state will not succumb to global trends with globalism by these stupid, alien to us, because our national interests are lost, our sovereignty. These are cultural programs. And this danger was laid down in August 1991 - the danger of hope that Russia is a European country, absolutely European. And with one degree or another of the lags, options, models, the same way will go as some small European country, sorry, Bulgaria, or Serbia, or Macedonia, etc. It is clear that this path will not go. This way to go, at least in her current condition, she refuses.

None of the 14 republics spoke out against Yeltsin in the sense that “no, we will remain in the common country”

It is very important to consider the dual code of Russian culture. It is also associated with the fact that the president of our country, a leader, for which from 53 to 86 percent, says that he is proud of his acquaintance with Yeltsin, and at the same time he says, either 10 minutes before, or 10 years before, that the greatest geopolitical disaster is the collapse of the USSR. Or the fact that the 90s (and this is the largest ideological model of the Kremlin) were dashing, that is, disgusting, gangster. All disgusting - and oligarchs, and Yeltsin, and power, and just all. This is today. Therefore, the present, in my opinion, is not even an ideological, but a cultural trap, associated with the fact that no one will recognize two things. First: none of the 14 republics spoke out against Yeltsin in the sense that “no, we will remain in the common country.” This was not. I mean not only an agreement with Belarus and Ukraine, but in general-Tajikistan, Uzbekistan, some other countries said, for example: "We are so one, we have been going on for centuries for so long. We want to be together. You still have oil, gas, electricity, etc.?" Nobody! We can imagine that about the same number of people as in Russia, because in the USSR there were 290 million 145 - almost half - Russia. 140 million - other countries, including Ukraine, Georgia, Moldova, etc. No one. Not one. It is forbidden to discuss. This is the first trap.

Your browser does not support HTML5

Daniil Dondurea 1

The second trap, more powerful, is due to the fact that it is not allowed to discuss, this is not accepted and unintelligent, and even the elite does not discuss this that the market, market relations that began in January 1992, saved the feudal type of consciousness, the protocommunistic. Since they were able to give such a volume of freedom. This was not given the authorities, this market also gave freedom. They gave such an opportunity to live better for at least 15 years, for the first time in 1000 years. I mean the people, the majority of the country; Regardless of the fact that the last 2 years has become more poor, behind the poverty line. But people do not understand (and should not understand) that these disgusting Gaidar with Yeltsin and the Chubais joined them made such transformations in which 21 million square kilometers were filled with food for the first time since 1929. No one then knew the capabilities of the market and its results.

I always give an example. My parents lived in the city of Penza. And on May 1, I went to them, on holidays. And I - 25 years I remember! -I went to the store to buy something to my parents, in Penza. And there some grandmother arranged a scandal to a young sales boy, in a grocery. She says: "What are you, dear to me, you slip this Polish oil?" Although there was a Vologda nearby. He says: "What? Good oil, Polish. They are agricultural, no worse than Vologda." - "Like, dear! You see, near Australian, environmentally friendly!" 60 with something, she stood in line just behind the discarded oil, behind Margarine, wrote on her hand ... I remember, wrote on the hand of the queue numbers. And after 4 months, exactly 4 months have passed, already knows these words - environmentally friendly, son. In these two phrases of the grandmother, a complete revolution, real. And she hates those people who brought it, still.

The gigantic achievement of the modern ideological doctrine that about half of the country's population of all ages hate bourgeois relations

This is a gigantic achievement of a modern ideological doctrine, which is about half of the population of the country of all ages, including 13-year-olds, 17-year-olds, hate bourgeois relations, private property. It is believed that the state should feed that the state would be the best business executive, that the state monopols are better than some kind of scoundrels-oligarchs. As a sociologist, I will say that if on January 1, 1992 you had 7.5 million cars, today, citizens of the Russian Federation, you have 45 million people without 20 kopecks! The Kremlin did not give you 38 million. These are the possibilities of a new life. The new middle class has two cars in some families. Girls sitting in Mercedes. Yes, many people moved to Moscow, to large cities. Yes, a million problems. But instead of 240 thousand foreign passports - 19 million. This is more than tens of times. You don’t even reflect this, because you have a different age, you, my children or my grandchildren. And I passed special exams in the commission at the party district committee to get a visiting visa. I went to Bulgaria and had to list in detail (I don’t remember in what year-in 1981 or in 1979, something like that) of all members of the Politburo of the Mongolian Labor Party. I had to know them all. And today you have multiple Schengen visas.

As if we were walking, walking, and then a good ruler came, and people began to live well

Therefore, the task was to forget this: this was not. As if we walked, walked, and then a good ruler came, and people began to live well. He raised oil prices. He began to take care of the people. And the gigantic achievement of Beria and secret Russian services, I mean the atomic project, allows you to do this. It is not said that this is a gigantic achievement of secret services and Beria, when they partially stole, agreed, relaxed, etc. All nuclear secrets. And the American elite went to this so that the war does not start, so that there was an alternative. But today it is the status of the second in nuclear potential of the country of the world that allows us to evaluate the events of 1991. If there were no atomic weapons, missile systems, these gigantic cosmic, anti-missile and other projects, then maybe in some sense other models, other relations. And today it is.

Therefore, the cultural program is current, especially after the cultural reboot of 2012, refuses. No one even says that many modern ideological programs completely contradict the current Constitution of the Russian Federation. Because there is no state ideology, in this constitution. Because there the market is not at all the feces of hell, like most Russian citizens. Therefore, I do not wait for any celebrations on the topic of the 91st year. I will say even more sharply: I think that the events of November 7, 2017 will be marked 10-50 times more significant, bright, conceptual. There will be a revision of many ideologies for this year, and they will not be rejected. In a year, the Great October Revolution will not be rejected. With criticism, so, “there is no need to contrast the red and white, this is the drama of our whole people”, “people wanted the best”, “the liberal intelligentsia, who came after February, could not cope, made many mistakes, someone had to show real power and power, give wonderful slogans, stop the war”, etc. All this will be. But the fact that this is a huge murdererian regime will not be cleared.

Russian cultural regulations did not want the type of country that had a chance to develop after August 21, 1991.

A certain number of Russian hypostases will pass, in 50 years, and they will remember-listen, it seems, on February 19, 1861, serfdom was canceled? A! A wonderful event! Listen, but what did we somehow not notice? Did we have slaves before? Yes, there were serfs, practically slaves. Wait, we have some holidays, but why is there no holiday of freedom-the abolition of serfdom? Well, somehow they didn’t have time, apparently, it was not so important, they slipped. There was one film recently about a person like Khrushchev. And Khrushchev, excuse me, was 11 years old, he held the XX Congress, freed himself from Stalinism, which he did not. So what? Well, was and was. And then there was also Andropov. So what? Who cares! So the point is not in personalities, but the matter of cultural prescriptions. Russian cultural regulations did not want the type of country that had a chance to develop after August 21, 1991, won here. They are not allowed to win.