The disposal of the whole country

A rare case on the GOSTELEKANAL. The correspondent asked Minister Lavrov how to link the gap of plutonium with sanctions, and he thanked the journalist (“It is good that you asked this question ...”), but could not really answer. That is, the minister said for a long time, mentioning the Vienna Convention, surveying caves and gaps in relation to the methods of processing a radioactive PU and devoting viewers to the subtlety of negotiations with American partners on energy problems, and in fact said nothing.

It remains a secret, how these events are related: the rejection of the Treaty of arms plutonia and the ultimatum of Putin. Why, in fact, to resume cooperation in this area, Obama should cancel the sanctions and the Magnitsky law, and also compensate for the damage. Well, also unfasten the counter -sanctions.

The only argument in the polemic with the White House was Russophobia . Say, the Kremlin "recorded a radical change in circumstances in concerns aggressive Russophobia, which is now under the basis of the US policy towards Russia, and therefore decided to hold plutonium at home. This sounded especially convincingly against the background of the minister’s reproaches to partners who, you see, do not know how to “build” relations with the Russian Federation in an adult ... without children's offenses and they are directly competing in pricking Putin President.

It turned out that Russophobia, that is, hatred of Russia and the Russians, is when they upset Vladimir Vladimirovich. It turned out that the wild conditions of ultimatum are dictated by his childish resentment. It turned out that on a pre -agreed issue (the issues were more or less agreed on the GOSTELEKANALS, and if the minister thanks separately for him, it means they were ordered to ask) they did not come up with what to answer. More precisely, Sergey Viktorovich considered the answer satisfactory, but these are his personal problems. Yes, and what, according to conscience, you say, if you were at least three times talleyrand, trying to explain in honor of what holiday the Americans will pay for the tomatoes crushed in Russia.

Of course, the minister did not set himself this goal: someone in the West to convince or at least coherently state a certain reasonable concept of relations with NATO and the USA. In the last two and a half years, such a task is not set before the Russian Foreign Ministry, since they are not going to solve it in the Kremlin. The message, according to the rooted tradition, was reduced to the intimidation of a probable enemy. Following Putin and Shoigu with his inherent Konashenkov, Lavrov warned that Russia was ready to fight with America, which he spoke directly. Pointing to the "group of persons" in Washington, "which gives a vote in favor of that" to "put" Assada on airfields. Against these "bursts of aggressiveness" and he elevated his voice, reporting that there were "air defense systems in Syria to protect our objects in Syria.

Actually, for that, the minister invited the correspondent of the first television channel to talk about the upcoming war. After the shelling of the humanitarian convoy in Aleppo and the destruction of hospitals, after the Russian veto on the project of the UN Security Council proposed by France, the situation in Syria worsened to the limit, and the word "outcast" in relation to the Russian Federation has gained the concreteness of a political verdict awarded by the world community. Lavrov has no arguments in a normal polemic. Only plutonium remains, and this, of course, is an important argument that one cannot fail to reckon with. As well as "Russophobia" as a clear evidence that there is no need to reinforce this argument. He is self -sufficient.

About the counter -revolutions who are looking for today in the White House, in the State Department, in the Pentagon, so far you can only guess. It is possible that in the heat of the fight against Trump, which is observed with such gloating in the Kremlin, the US government will want to mobilize its citizens following the example of Putin, and then the blackmail speeches of Lavrov and others will be very useful. For the so -called world war is an equalnia with many unknown, and few, with the exception of classified narrow specialists, is able to develop its scenarios and judge the consequences. It is only worth noting that, trying to hesitate the Americans, the Russian authorities simultaneously plunge them into a temptation.

Because for the first time in their history, they really face the threat of total destruction. They literally look into the abyss, and great, probably, the temptation of these fears to get rid of once and for all. I’m afraid that in Moscow, where the touchy presumptuous authorities so enthusiastically and gambling plays the war, do not quite take into account this circumstance and underestimate the risks. Or they deliberately attract misfortune, having stolen personal geopolitical disasters, which is even worse.

In general, if we seriously talk about Russophobia, then it manifests itself in every way. In the ideas about an ideal state, for which a separate living person is the dust under his feet, a fascinated serf, an nameless convict, a humble slave, a zombie viewer. In the monuments to various murderers , which destroyed compatriots in whole cities. And if you take politics, then the pathological hatred of the Russian people is expressed that no one is sorry and it is possible, hoping on the fortress of the walls in special bomb shelters, to expose an entire country.

As Khrushchev did, wanting to "launch a hedgehog in his pants to the Americans." As Putin does with his speakers, for which Russophobia is a propaganda crap, which no one perceives abroad, but frostbite pup is eagerly swallowing. They are the main Russophobes.

That is why in discussions with them, the strategy that the current American administration still follows so far. The strategy of partial boycott, painful sanctions and patient waiting. The strategy based on the fact that hostile to all peoples, starting with Russian, should be crumbling itself - under the burden of their war crimes, political demonovations and economic miscalculations. This is also a nasty scenario for Russia, but still better than war. About which on our television channels, “experts” are now, like the wounded, and yesterday Lavrov spoke out majestically. Taking a show -off, as he alone knows how.