Life through hanging

It seems that the Komsomol members are behind time. They got lost and lost somewhere at the beginning of the damned nineties, if not at the end of the eighties of the twentieth century. Then one could still worry that "the theme of the political repressions of the past ... acquired from our authorities some kind of painful popularity." Now these troubles are behind, and the bald accusations of the RKSM (b) figures (b) against our current rulers border on the political and social system of modern Russia.

Well, really. The music of the anthem has long been Soviet again, the words are patriotic, and under this bravura accompaniment the country returns to the Stakhanov pace today where unanimity is the main cross. Russia falls to the origins, there are a lot of them, and everyone jointly pours into the general stream, forming a full -flowing river. The ax floats along the river, and the eras and heroes are harmoniously located along the banks, not conflicting with each other. Tsar Ivan and the inhabitants of the cities heated in the blood, Tamerlan Stalin and the prisoners of the Gulag, the executioner Serov and the peoples exiled to him, the dear Leonid Ilyich and the classic Alexander Isaevich - all are in demand, all good, everyone was adjusted. From Prince Vladimir to President Vladimir.

This is a new national idea, in which people are not important, their actions and fate, but Russia, declared the Great. With her monarchs, communist leaders and legally elected guarantors of constitutional freedoms. Russia is above all, the whites were pissed off with the Reds, and even if communism is not in fashion, but also Comrade. Zyuganov is now reserved an honorary place where there are no discussions, and different Komsomol members are also not haunted. In short, the era in the yard is unprecedented, pluralistic in fact, although authoritarian according to tradition. It's just that this is an authoritarianism of a different type, however, do the Komsomol members need to understand the varieties of maternity authoritarianism in detail, annoyed and capriciously discarding Putin? Is it worth it to posthumously repress the famous writer when he seems to be in a magnificent way in the history of a great country?

Theoretically, they can probably be understood, young Leninists. Yes, Solzhenitsyn was a convinced anti -communist, which was not immediately recognized in the Central Committee and in the KGB. However, the comrades of Komsomol members forget about the dialectics, about which so much was written by leaders and teachers, or can be explained on a simple example: he was Yakir a hero, became an enemy of the people. In his relationship with the Russian, partly with the Soviet government, Alexander Isaevich made a return trip. The author of the “Letters of Leaders”, he turned out to be a supporter of imperial ideas in terms of expanding the Russian state due to neighboring territories, and in the thundering article in which he buried communism, predicted the restoration of post -Soviet control over various kinds of anti -Soviet enclaves. Imagining themselves sovereign states.

And he wrote about Crimea there, and about the Donbass, and in general about Novorossia, using this word unknown then, and the pro -Moscow riots predicted, and referendums. Like, "only the local population can decide the fate of their area, its area," and the same applied to Belarusians and the Nashensky Kazakh land. Alas, the borders of the Orthodox Comintern sharply narrowed after a well -known geopolitical disaster, but it is necessary to be realistic. Solzhenitsyn was a realist, seeing and, freely or involuntarily, provoking the "anti -fascist" wars in the territories of the former USSR. In accordance with his covenants and furious anti -Western speeches of recent years, Comrade is valid. Putin, lifting Russia from the knees.

Of course, if you peer into what is happening with a vigilant Komsomol gaze, then one cannot but note some contradictions between communist and fascist ideals. But are they so fundamental? Or do youth under red banners oppose the return of the original Russian, as well as Soviet lands?

It is not the fact that Solzhenitsyn had to be hanged, comrades of the Komsomol members.

The posthumous fate of Alexander Isaevich is strikingly developing. The man in the Kremlin, whom the writer compared with Stolypin, gratefully remembers him and revere him, and the editor -in -chief of the "literary" will slander him in the style of the most unbridled Soviet propaganda. The authorities are honored by the classic of great honors, and Solzhenitsyn was held at school, and 2018 was declared the year of Solzhenitsyn, and his brother in the muse and “Novorosky”, a like -minded person Zakhar Prilepin calls the “gulag” a collection of tanks and calls for a book from the school curriculum. Why, they, Komsomol members and writers, in many respects of the navigators with him - in relation to perestroika, and to Yeltsin, and Anschlus, he would probably welcome, and the tractor drivers of Donbass. But the early Isaich inspires them with such hostility that they are ready to hang directly - and hung. "Potomers are not looking for light," as he himself wrote on a different reason, and everything is silent, restless hearts.

It is probably the same dialectic, but again turned into the past. The fact is that the early Solzhenitsyn, the anti-communist and humanist, the author of “One Day”, “In the Circle of the First” and “Gulag”, is so cool that he overshadows Solzhenitsyna-emigrant, a passionate preacher of the future Putinism, and Solzhenitsyn of the late, secret and obvious interlocutor of the leader. That great Isaich, among other things, is also a real artist, greatly damaged Isaich to a stately concerned, authoritarian, crippling his native language. The writer still overshadows in the minds of patriotically thinking eternal communists a teacher of life and wise interlocutor of the wisest Putin. In a country where historical memory is gradually, but steadily destroyed, and praise is offered, and the monument to the formidable hung over the eagle, and the Stalinobuses crawl into the Russian cities, the early Solzhenitsyn fights with the dilapidated and wins.

That Alexander Isaevich, who still did not know how to equip Russia, but erected in his best books the memorial executed and tortured, he prevails, and hesitates from hatred for him. Well, this should be considered a recognition. Again, contrary to everything, he becomes a “renegade” and returns to us, a miracle that has survived in a Soviet prison, a writer, in order to expose the inhuman evil by means of great Russian literature, depicting one happy day of Ivan Denisovich. He is alive again, and I want to read and re -read it. As before, when he was just starting, and a little later, when he was totally prohibited, and after, when he printed in Russia everything he wanted, rapidly behind himself.