Server America

From the American election polemic, it blows with light schizophrenia.

“Everything that supporters of the conspiracy theory inspired for years,“ everything was confirmed, everything turned out to be true, ”the star Fox News Shan Hanniti broadcasts .“ Now it has opened that Hillary thinks what she believes ... let them say, to promote progressive ideology to arrange a revolution, what is the way of thinking, it looks like communism, no matter how Soviet propaganda. It is sad, but this is true, and this is a reality, and this is the world in which you live. "

The opposite side scares the Americans with dictatorship.

“We are not the authorities to which you, Trump, are rushing,” the well -known commentator -publicist Kate Albermann addresses the Republican’s candidate directly to the candidate of the Republican. “The power that you want to possess already exists. It is called Putin's dictatorship.”

“Once we were a country of freedom, and now we turn into a country of tyranny,” says Actor John Voit, a convinced tramponist, a “midnight cowboy” and “return home”.

And Robert de Niro, in turn, wants to give Trump in the face.

The atmosphere is nervous. Trenches are to blame for everything. The great and terrible hacker Guccifer 2.0 haches one after another democrat servers, Wilileaks dumps all these tens of thousands of pages into overall access. And in these documents there is not: the use of official position for personal purposes, and contempt for Trump's electorate, and mockery of Catholics, and an intrigue against the opponent Hillary Sanders, and the deal of the State Department with the FBI. Even Chelsea Clinton got into the dissidents: holding the post of vice president of the Clinton Foundation, she tried to free herself from too dense the guardianship of the slander of dad and mother. Resolutely a conspiracy against America!

When the National Committee of the Democratic Party asked for cybersecurity experts to deal with the first hack, they quite confidently suggested that this was the work of the Russian hackers, and related to the Russian government. Clinton's headquarters took this hypothesis into service. Trump in their image turned into the creature and puppet of Putin, since he himself publicly urged Moscow to find the missing Hillary correspondence. The special services took up the investigation and said that it was too early to draw the final conclusions. Presumably, they experienced considerable pressure of the administration. Vladimir Putin, for his part, urged not to look for crackers, but to read documents:

And then, is it important who hacks these data from Ms. Clinton's campaign headquarters? Is it important? It is important that it is the content of what was presented to the public. Around this, a discussion should actually be conducted. No need to take the public attention from the essence of the problem, replacing some secondary issues related to the search for who did it.

This statement can hardly be called a refutation. Moreover, further Putin contradicts himself:

Honestly, I could not even imagine, if you tell you frankly that information of this kind could be of interest to the American public, that, it turns out, the election headquarters of one of the candidates, in this case, Ms. Clinton, worked for it, and not evenly for all candidates of the Democratic Party. Yes, it just never occurred to me that it might be interesting for someone. Therefore, even from this point of view, we could not officially climb there. For this, you see, you need to feel the nerve and the features of the domestic political life of the United States. Not sure that even our experts in the Foreign Ministry feel it properly.

Supervision more than pride. I do not think that you need to be seven spans in the forehead to understand that the information that the party car with all her might helped Clinton and drowned Sanders is of undoubted interest for American voters and seriously compromise the procedure for the intra -party selection of candidates. It was because of this compromising evidence that the chairman of the Committee Debbie Wasserman-Shulz, the chairman of the Committee of the Committee, was forced to resign on the eve of the National Party Congress. The result is quite serious. Putin’s races are only able to make additional confusion into the situation: did he have seen the materials of the leak before their publication?

Apparently, the last straw for special services was the hack of the mailboxes of the CIA director John Brennan and other high -ranking US officials. (In this case, two Americans have been arrested in North Carolin, nothing has been reported about their connection with Russian hackers.) A joint statement of the US Department of Internal Security and the Director of National Intelligence Director, which said black and white, has appeared: it was said: it has been reported:

The US intelligence community has no doubt that the Russian government has led recent invasions to the electronic correspondence of American citizens and institutions, including American political organizations.

This statement allowed the Democrats to take an extremely convenient position: since the Kremlin organized the hacks soon, then there is nothing to understand them, there was nothing to do with Russian intelligence. Here, the Russian State Agency Sputnik International was right here: in the publication of another leak, it attributed to a long -time friend and adviser to Cydney Cydney Blmentacle the text from the article by Newsweek journalist Kurt Aichenwald, who is quoted by Blimental. Now it is not a day that loyal Hillary does not talk about what agitprop, misinformation, active measures and other Soviet intelligence tricks are, using the "Lenin" methods of propaganda. Clinton advisers are now simply ignoring all new revelations: they say, we are not just to refute or confirm authenticity, but we will not read these fakes.

Trump's supporters did not stop the statement of the intelligence community. They heeded the advice of Putin not to look at the circumstances of the leaks, but at their content. Since they are generally more loud and aggressive, in all this there is a feeling of collective psychosis.

Many Americans today are wondering: what does the head of Wikileaks think Julian Assange? Why does he play along with one of the candidates, where is his vaunted objectivity? Where is Trump's hacks? Did he finally sell to Putin?

I already wrote about his motives, but now there is something to add. His first large -scale leak - a huge array of American diplomatic correspondence - he published in 2010, when Hillary Clinton served as a Secretary of State. It was a powerful blow to America international prestige. Assange has every reason to believe that she did not forgive him for this. And vice versa: with his current revelations, he provided an invaluable service of Trump, which without ceasing draws compromise from this bottomless treasure.

The Assange, of course, was sore, his forced four -year recluse at the Ecuador Embassy in London. The circle of his communication is very narrow. As the conclusions of doctors published in September by Assange himself, he has serious health problems: he suffers from toothache, he is tormented by inflammation in the right shoulder joint. The most detailed conclusion was written by the psychologist. From it we learned that the formidable exposure lives in a room with an area of ​​five and a half square meters without sunlight, where only a bed and a wardrobe are placed. He works in a common office room with other embassy employees. There, he takes food and is engaged in physical exercises on the Running path simulator. The embassy is not able to provide him with a greater hospitality: it occupies only a few apartments on the ground floor of a six -story residential building with a total area of ​​only 200 square meters, it has neither a courtyard, nor a lawn where you could breathe fresh air and stretch. Sed -footing, sensory starvation, existence in a closed space led Assange to the persecution mania, malfunctions of the daily biorhythm and ultimately to depression.

In addition, at the beginning of next year, Presidential elections will be held in Ecuador. The current President Rafael Correa, who steadily defending Assange and flatly refused to be issued, had already stated that he would not be re -elected. This uncertainty of position greatly bothers Wikileak's father.

Did he become easy prey of Russian special services? I would refrain from such a statement. Of course, you can recall his short -lived - from May to July 2012 - cooperation with the RT (Russia Today) television company as a leading talk show, but since then a lot of water has flowed. For Assange, the current leaks are a gesture of despair. In an interview, he insists on his objectivity and calls the plague to both houses. In July, in an interview with the correspondent of the Democracy Now news portal! Amy Goodman, who reproached him for spoiling the rating of Hillary Clinton, he said: "Do you suggest me choose between cholera and gonorrhea?"

WikiLeaks employee Sarah Harrison says that if the organization at the disposal of materials with compromise on Trump appear, she will publish them. But they don't appear.

When WikiLeaks published the first fruits of hacking the servers of the Democratic Party, another recluse and the once supplier of materials for her - Edward Snowden responded to this event. His replica appeared on Twitter:

The democratization of information has never been more important, and Wikileaks helped this. But their hostility even to weak drugs is a mistake.

In order to compose an answer , Wikileaks took an hour and a half:

Opportunism you will not deserve forgiveness from Clinton, and the medicine is not the censorship of the ruling party.

This is a quiet tragedy of both wanderers.

However, the question arises, which is not the first day the American media is asked : since the culprit of the hacks has been set, is it time to deliver a response? On Friday, Vice President Joe Biden significantly said that the answer is ready and will be applied "at a convenient time for us, in the circumstances when it takes the greatest effect." On the same day, the NBC News television company said that the CIA has prepared the counterattack options, which are now on the desk of President Obama.

President Putin responded to these threats from the distant Goa: anything can be expected from our American friends. What did he say so new? Do we not know that the official bodies of the United States are spying on everyone and eavesdropping on everyone?

And he proposed his explanation:

Apparently, they are a little nervous ... After all, they need to show, explain to their population, voters, why it wasn’t done or this.

And finally, he involuntarily revealed the technology of stuffing:

After all, you can serve a half -truth, you can do a quarter of the truth, you can dilute a little true, and then use this information to mislead public opinion in one or another country.

Actually, it is not even clear that the Americans in the Kremlin can hack this. Putin does not use e -mail, the Russian public will no longer surprise offshores, and Pusigate, who caused Trump so, does not threaten him - in Russia they are more than condescending to machism and sexism, if not approvingly. He has immunity from any stuffing. However, we’ll see - we will see.