
"The creative editor of Sobesednik.ru talked with the director Andrei Konchalovsky about the past, present and future of Russia" - in such words it opens on the website " Interlocutor " of the interview of Dmitry Bykov with the famous film director, brother of Nikita Mikhalkov. Konchalovsky recently received a film award in Venice, shooting a film about Michelangelo, but all his thoughts, it seems, is about Russia - that’s the interview is entitled by the brightest phrase from it: "The longer Putin will be, the better." This fragment:
“Will he, apparently, rule for life?”
I feel bitterness in your lapel! Do you have an alternative? The longer it will rule, the better it is for Russia. Russia is now the only one except China who can prevent the "three fat people" ditch the planet. So they will not leave us alone.
- Tell me, was it necessary to enter the Crimea?
Why do you ask me such funny test questions to understand that I am “my” or “alien”? It’s just a fact - in the seventeenth, a contract with Ukraine is expiring for the placement of our fleet in Sevastopol, and the Ukrainians and the Americans have already agreed on a military base with NATO. So in Crimea there would be an American base with all the ensuing consequences. Can you imagine this: American Crimea?!
All the answers of the "master" are designed in the same, "state" spirit. This passage gained particular popularity on the network:
- You know, Andrei Sergeyevich ... To hear from you the word "Anglo -Saxons" - before that I really did not think to survive. Further, probably, there will be “geopolitics”.
- In the word "Anglo -Saxons" there is no negative meaning. They were always the most advanced ideologists of imperial expansion. Another influential English court astrologer, mathematician, astronomer, geographer and secret agent John Dee at the end of the sixteenth century in letters to Elizabeth were the first to inspire her about the special world purpose of the New World. He was involved in the queen’s secret foreign policy and stood at the origins of the struggle with Russia. By the way, John Dee signed his secret messages to the queen with the pseudonym "007". England has always been afraid of competition with Russia. She constantly pushed Russia with other states. A century and a half ago, the English Prime Minister, Lord Palmerston, admitted-"How hard it is to live when no one is fighting with Russia." There is nothing to add! Trying to weaken Russia, the British always successfully fought with us by the wrong hands - French, German, Turkish. It seems to me that the revolutionary agitprop of Mayakovsky times of the 20s is fully consistent with reality. There is world capital, “three fat men”, about which Olesha briefly guessed everything brilliantly - so the world imperialism looks. Of course, Rockefeller and Soros have a clear idea of how the world should be equipped. But, you agree, take into account their opinion as a mistake, Gaidar with Chubais has already tried it ... Now the “fat men” are coming to the showdown. For example, the European Rothschild clan is not for life, but to death competes with American Rockefellers. If you suspect that it smells of a “quilted jacket” from my answers, I do not mind. Consider that I am a quilted jacket.
Many perceived the words of the director "Asi Klyachina" and "Tango and the Cache" in bewilderment.
I remember that before he had a slightly different opinion, how everything changes .... and what for the sake?
The simplest explanation, of course, is this:
Not otherwise they gave money to "eating at home". So he bit his tongue. And from half a year ago, Lazarus of Russia sang right. <...> He still doubted that Putin is the leader that Russia needs. But now he has no doubt ...
As they say: the loot wins evil ...
Not speech, but a Lenin appassionate. I think that ultimately Mikhalkov will be able to interfere with the new leader of the semi -proletariat several kilograms of money to open the treasured catering under the family brand - as in our city - "Astrakhan without America". It is just located next to the room under the sign of McDonald's, apparently by irony))
Earth, can you hear this itch? Three Mikhalkov crawl for you (c) V. Gaft
“Few people understand that Russian culture is a huge archaic slab that lies throughout Eurasia and does not even go up to Slavs, but to the Pre -Slavicism, to pagan antiquity itself. We got Orthodoxy in inheritance from Byzantium, but neither Jewish scholasticism, nor Greek philosophy, nor Roman law. And in this - both our deficiency and this advantage. Nobody has managed to move the tectonic plate so far. (3 days ago) A. Konchalovsky
"I am convinced: Russia needs a leader who would have the courage of Peter the Great in order to tell people words that they have not heard for a long time.
This will be bitter truth, because it is difficult to admit that Russia cannot move forward, because it does not want to understand how far it lagged behind in its civilizational development from Europe. "
A. Konchalovsky
Where is the truth? !!!!!!! ??? <...>
A couple of years ago, Citizen Konchalovsky convinced us that we are unconditionally European country, that we have no way, as soon as in Europe. But, like, there are two Russia - one that Nikita Mikhalkov professes, with the king in his face and the other Russia - Petrovskaya -Konchalovskaya!
The gigantic unifying role between the antagonist brothers played seven hundred million rubles from the “royal treasury” to create a grub for the people - Khavka!
Well, or this:
How terrible the senile stupidity is
Not everyone can cope with the upcoming old age of Konchalovsky: the longer Putin will be, the better https://t.co/wfsgewc8e2
- Oleg Panfilov (@olegpanfilov7) October 19, 2016
Or even this:
For example, the Konchalovsky European clan is not for life, but to death competes with the American Mikhalkov
“Guards”, I must say, are also a little perplexed, but in any case, the holiday is on their street!
Something somewhere in the world crashed ...
Konchalovsky, Westernik and liberal, an example of supposedly European intellectual, who managed to integrate into the western kin-business on third roles, which in 2012 hysterical about the degradation of Russia, urging the Russians to be horrified by himself and Putin-this very Konchalovsky in an interview with the same Western Bykov broke all the Albadsev templates and appeared in ardent quilted jacket. Crimean and anti -imperialist.
There, which is not a phrase, then a shell in the brain of a handshake.
Konchalovsky simply trampled Bykov. Beautiful, elegant. So that Bykov was simply scared to talk more on this topic.
Alexander Morozov sums up:
Dmitry Bykov talked with Konchalovsky. An interesting (and gloomy) picture: Konchalovsky talks about the Rothschilds and Rockefeller, about the collapse of the Anglo -Saxons world, about the tectonic plate of Eurasia (which is subtly ruled by Putin, wisely capturing its geological shocks and signals ...). The state "New Eurasia" *on the site of the former "Russia" found both the language of description and gifted adherents ...
Live and live this "new Eurasia"!
In the pantheon of this newest Eurasia, Ivan the Terrible occupies an important place. The point here is not only in the monument open in Orel. The New Gazeta publishes an article by Boris Knorre "Oprichny Theology", which examines the evolution of the views of the Russian Orthodox Church on the "Terrible Tsar". In short - the current attempts to create the cult of Grozny contradict the entire 400 -year -old Russian tradition:
We will move to 20 years ago and recall how the campaign for the canonization of Ivan the Terrible passed, and what arguments in favor of veneration of Ivan the Terrible were spoke in the church environment at this time. <...>
It turns out a paradox. If the whole classical historical point of view on Grozny, which has developed before the revolution, is “distorted”, “false” and “rewritten” under the “dictation of European partners”, then the period of Russian history during the Romanov dynasty, and until the end of the 30s of the XX century (when they began to rehabilitate the formidable of the formidable), is a period of enslavement of Russia “Western partners”. It is necessary to recognize this period with one “big turmoil”, which lasted 350 years, and the restoration of “historical truth” to be calculated from the Stalinist time.
In this case, Russia in this case for more than three centuries in a row was not quite Russia, Orthodoxy, in the tradition of which it was a formidable “new Herod” - not quite Orthodoxy, autocracy - not quite autocracy, history is not history, etc. ...
As a result, we come to a phenomenon called Counter-History in science, when a certain parallel or alternative vision of the world adopted in science is created under the influence of conspiracy ideas.
It must be admitted that such a vision of the world is inherent, obviously, to the rector of Moscow State University, mathematics Viktor Sadovnich. The letter on his behalf is published by the official portal of the Oryol region :
Accept from me personally and on behalf of the team of Moscow State University named after M.V. Lomonosov is the most sincere congratulations on the opening of the first monument to Ivan the Terrible in Russia-the founder of the fortress city of an eagle!
In the history of the Russian state, Ivan IV is one of the symbols of Russian statehood, and the time of its reign is inscribed in gold pages in the history of our homeland.
Many are outraged.
Will the historical faculty come? Do you agree to the Department of Ethics? The Scientific Council of Moscow State University understands that he was crap, and did this not excluded student, and the rector himself and, in addition on behalf of the Council itself?
So the session came for the teachers themselves. The question is one: is there even a drop of teaching and scientific ethics among the teachers of the university? Or do they only teach money for money, that "we must live according to conscience"?
And personally, the gardener is not time to resign?
However, no, he must still “restore historical justice” and again on behalf of the team to ask MSU to the Moscow State University and V. Stalin
Viktor Sadovnichi - the rector of Moscow State University, if that - called the reign of Ivan the Terrible "gold pages in the history of Russia." Social statements of mathematicians is an occasion to neighing the humanities and recoup for offensive demotivators :-)
As they say: "Not to the same extent, Victor Antonovich!"
Klyuchevsky, Karamzin and others, who called a formidable psychopath and killer - shut up ....
Ivan the Terrible, in his children's years, loved to throw cats from high tower. By the age of 15, he began to “damage people”.
The rector of Moscow State University V. Sadovnichy calls these years "gold pages in the history of Russia." Congratulations to the Orlov governor - on whose territory the monument is not on his own personally, but from the entire team of Moscow State University.
You would not cling to the team, Victor Antonych. In hell - I just remind - everyone will burn individually.
Oleg Pshenichny recalled the old video.
Doctor of Physical and Mathematical Sciences, Rector of Moscow University, Sadovnichy aloud, calculates 15 percent of the number 200. Guess how much he did?
Doctor of Physics and Mathematics, Rector of Moscow University, Sadovnichi aloud, calculates 15 percent of the number 200. Pic.twitter.com/qp6jbxzett
- Team of zinaportnova (@zn_portnova) October 20, 2016
Oleg Kashin writes on Rus2Web:
The new favorite of official monumental art is the Terrible, about which the Oryol authorities suddenly remembered as the founder of the city, but the equestrian statue of the famous king clearly claims to be more than the status of urban attractions. The monument was opened by Alexander Prokhanov and Sergey Kurginyan, who are not related to the eagle, but closely related to the ideological searches of the Kremlin in recent years. New monuments to Ivan the Terrible and the street of his name are announced - in fact, the rehabilitation of the most odious Russian tsar, whose monuments were not placed even in tsarist Russia, have already taken place. Just seven years ago, in Russia, Pavel Lungin’s film “The Tsar” was very successful in which Ivan the Terrible, in accordance with the centuries -old cultural tradition, was shown by the murderer and tyrant, but this movie remained in the “Medvedev” modernizing era - director Lungin now indignantly comprises the monument to Ivan the Terrible, but, obviously, the authorities will not hear it.
Pavel Lungin made an open letter in Novaya Gazeta.
Almost everything is known about Grozny. He was a sonnovy, a wife, a grandson. Personally took part in torture. He interrupted the prayer, and dictated - whom and how to torture. It is known that this person was a real villain.
Moreover, it is known that he lost all wars in the last 20 years of reign. And the result of his reign was one of the gloomy periods in the history of Russia. He divided the country into his and strangers. Everything resulted in the Time of Troubles, which was essentially a civil war.
<...>
The question arises, what is Russia mad? Why does the villain want to exalt in five centuries? <...>
I would like to warn: “Do not cause the spirit of the villain. Do not play with fire, this is a dangerous game, the victims of which you yourself can become. "
Now Lungin could not stand it. God forbid, so that he does not renounce after the first roosters.
O. Interesting. Pavel Semenovich Lungin seems to be getting up. <...>
Maybe he begins to guess about something? Two and a half years later? In essence, not long.
This refers to the signature of Lungin under a letter in support of Putin’s actions in Crimea.
Many people write that the glory of the Terrible contradict the Russian culture itself.
Alexander Nevzorov observes:
Now there is such an adultery, a delightful amazing trend that is well traced on the stories with Ivan the Terrible, when the most wild, the most Neanderthal, most primitive and vicious become national idols.
So it is necessary - Eduard Bir believes
The ghost of Ivan the Terrible, as well as Stalin, constantly hovers in the corridors of the Kremlin and is always ready to come true in reality. And the current “boyars” are well remembered that Vladimir Putin is capable of the most non -standard and strong -willed decisions if it is impossible to preserve the country otherwise. Another thing is that everything will be legally verified without arbitrariness, with a weighty evidence base, which probably gathered all these years.
This is the true reason for the hatred of the Russian autocrat of the middle of the 16th century of the current free and liberal -thinking opposition and built into the power vertical. Obligering Ivan the Terrible, drawing him with the fascination of hell, they try to take a sword to the punishing sovereign, since they really wage the war against the Russian state. Of course, there are those who succumbed to the indiscriminate criticism of John Vasilyevich and repeat the stamps of Lungin and Svanidze in thought. But the source of these stamps is just as I described above.
Oprichnina 2.0, probably, will never come in Russia, but it is needed at least as a constant threat to the current owners of expensive yachts and foreign villas.
Even Maxim Sokolov is skeptical of such a justification of the need for the worship of the formidable.
How to withdraw treason from stone Moscow.
The apologists of John IV, as I understood, consider his actions to combat the boyar treason completely correct and note that now there is the same betrayal. Then the question arises: in case V.V. Putin is finally enlightened with the mind, it would be more correct to indicate to him the candidates for the block now?
And then the struggle with treason is warmly praised, but they are not called traitors by name.
Fear became the main cross - first of the honorary role was played by oil rent. Gingerbread for everyone has long been missing, so emergency import substitution of horror was deployed. Moreover, it should be terrible: the elites that they will be taken accumulated and deprived of access to British ships and British universities for children. The people repeating "if only there was no war." The residents of the eagle, whom Biker Zaldostanov on behalf of “all wolves of the Russian spring” congratulated on the “new semantic symbol”.
Konstantin Krylov fell upon the current "Medinsky" idea of the "continuity of Russian history" from the standpoint of nationalism:
This “our common story” needs to be “entirely accepted”. What is meant by this is usually not specified. If, again, how to shake the preacher of a similar point of view, then, after a long mummies and bays, it turns out that this is what is about. The Russians, it turns out, should not be angry with those who arranged bloody baths, ruined, humiliated, took property, etc. They must “accept all this” as “part of their historical fate”, do not call those who did it bad words, and in no case even think about modern beneficiaries of all these atrocities. <...> Take, for example, the same formidable. What, in fact, is meant by “recognition of continuity”? Maybe the figure of the formidable is not sufficiently lit, abides in undeserved oblivion? No, she is known in Russian history even too well. Further-maybe some of his glorious deeds are forgotten, and only now they have been discovered? No, the glorious that he did is also well known. What is the speech about then? Everything is very simple: we are trying to force us to love the most vile, the most terrible events of this reign, primarily the oprichnina. That is, the massive and monstrously cruel destruction of people, both the highest rank and the lowest.
For almost 400 years, Russia recalled Ivan with some squeamishness. And Slavophiles and Westerners; and tsarist authorities and intellectuals; And the nobles and the rackers converged in the assessment of Ivan.
Neither the successor - King Fedor did not remember him with good; Neither Godunov nor the new dynasty are all three of his centuries, from Mikhail “Filaretovich” to Nikolai-2. <...>
Итог правления - СМУТА и крушение всего, всех его сумбурных, плохо им самим понимаемых, начинаний. Рухнула и сама династия. Ничего не осталось от его эпохи, кроме кликухи “грозный”: гроза, стихийное бедствие, пожары и смерти.
What next? Свой вариант предлагает агентство фейковых новостей Интерсакс :
Rostov-on-Don. ИНТЕРСАКС. В России открыт первый памятник Андрею Чикатило. Монумент известному серийному убийце появился в одном из центральный парков Ростова-на-Дону и был открыт в торжественной обстановке. «Чикатило – наш знаменитый земляк, человек который прославился сам и прославил наши края на весь мир. К нему можно по-разному относиться, но очевидно одно: это одна из самых значительных фигур в истории Ростовской области», – отметил губернатор Василий Голубев.