Alexander Golts: "The art of taking on the rank"

"The general director of the Russian Post Dmitry Strashnov was received by 95 million rubles as a prize for 2014. The Prosecutor General’s prosecutor’s office sent the verification materials to institute criminal proceedings under the article“ abuse of official powers. ”However, the postal chief of Strashov believes that it was a decent assessment of his successes in the provision of postal services to the population. As a consumer of these services, as a consumer of these services, as a consumer of these services. In the city of Moscow, I can say with confidence: these successes do not cost 90 million, they are not a broken penny at all, ”writes the chief editor of the“ Daily Journal ” .

"And here it is the long -awaited reaction of the Kremlin to the Escapada of Strashnov." Any position on this score is currently not formulated, I know that the General Prosecutor's Office has questions, at the same time, of course, the excretion mechanisms, calculations and volumes of the allocated prizes are regulated, documented, in this case there is a point of view of the Ministry of Service of the Ministry of Service, and not in this history not in this history I think that the Kremlin should somehow be related, it is certainly necessary to be based on the documents that are now available, ” said Presidential press secretary Dmitry Peskov.

And thus, maybe, not wanting it, Putin's interpretation formulated one of the most important principles of the Russian state. The official can make any abuse, the main thing is that everything is “regulated” and “documented”. And he can expect that the Kremlin in this case will not be at all. That is, no one is attempting to be bureaucratic rent, but he is allowed to receive it only and exclusively from the hands of the state. In this, I suspect, the meaning of the repressions that Putin vuls in the last weeks of large and small Russian bosses is. ”

"... Mr. Strashnov - exclusively in his right. And he confidently declares that he is not going to abandon the prize. According to him, in this case a" dangerous precedent " would be created. And he is absolutely right."

"If someone took a serious extent to which the income of the heads of state corporations is associated with the real effect of their managerial decisions, a very dangerous precedent would actually be created. The right of the chief chief of the country to appoint to their favorites arbitrarily high content would be called into question. At the expense of the people he controls."