
The European Court of Human Rights was ordered by the Russian government to pay 12 thousand euros of three three, the ex-head of the head of the Tsaritsyno Department of Internal Affairs Denis Evsyukov in 2009. The lawyer Irina Khrunova reported this to the Franes.
The ECHR unanimously found the Russian government guilty of violating the right to life (Article 2 of the European Convention on the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms) and obliged to pay Alena Dudal 12 thousand euros of compensation. Two other victims, Ilya Gerasimenko and Louise Salikhova, also awarded compensation for 12 thousand euros.
According to Khrunova, the court concluded that "the state did not fulfill its obligation in accordance with Article 2 of the Convention to take appropriate measures to protect the lives of people under its jurisdiction, without ensuring careful selection and control of representatives of the state who are allowed to wear firearms."
The court found that the police officer, whose personality was not correctly appreciated during the selection and was left without proper supervision after promoting to a leading position, tried to kill the applicants with a pistol with cartridges, which he had access to the police due to his service.
Alena Dudal asked the European Court to find guilty of violating the right to life (Article 2 of the Convention on the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms) or “Prohibition of Torture” (Article 3), if the court cannot apply article 2, as well as ensure fair compensation.
On December 7, 2011, the Tver District Court of Moscow refused Dudal in a lawsuit against the Ministry of Finance of Russia. As compensation for non -pecuniary damage, the victim required 1 million rubles.
The Ministry of Finance argued that at the time of the crime the crime, Denis Evsyukov did not actually fulfill the powers of a law enforcement officer, although he was in a police tunic. As a result, the court considered that there was no evidence that the wound was caused by the illegal actions of law enforcement officials, and the state should not be liable for the actions of Evsyukov.
On April 16, 2012, the Judicial Collegium for Civil Cases of the Moscow City Court left this decision unchanged.
Dudal emphasized that when committing a crime, Denis Evsyukov used cartridges and a pistol received by him in the police. In addition, the form of a police officer, in which Evsyukov was dressed, influenced the girl’s behavior, "limiting her to the ability to protect her health and life in a timely manner."
In total, as a result of Evsyukov’s shots, on the night of April 27, 2009, two people were killed, seven were injured. As a result of the wound, Dudal was diagnosed with a “gunshot, non -storage thoracocervic wound, a gunshot hole in the upper corner of the left shoulder blade, a foreign body of the soft tissues of the neck in the projection of the left transverse process of the 6 cervical vertebra, regarding harm to the health of medium severity” were diagnosed.
On February 19, 2010, the Moscow City Courtfound Evsyukov guilty of the commission of two murders and 22 assassination assassinations, an encroachment on the life of law enforcement officials and the illegal turnover of weapons. He was sentenced to life imprisonment.