Translated material
Putin and "Journalistic Terror"
The press conference of Vladimir Putin, transferred for two days, nevertheless took place. The organizers in the usual manner can trim about new records (although the conference was not the longest in history), but most of the politicized audience was skeptical from the very beginning.
One thing is pleasing - that still during the “direct line” with Putin, the combatants do not go around the apartments, and do not check if you have a TV.
- Uncle Shu (@shulz) December 23, 2016
All -Russian journalistic competition for the title of chief Kholuy began pic.twitter.com/7euv636tqd
- Alexey Navalny (@navalny) December 23, 2016
In what minute will he say about milk yield?
- Alexey Navalny (@navalny) December 23, 2016
Surprisingly, they spoke about milk yield quickly - one of the first questions was already about agriculture.
What do hawthorn drink in the village, since living there is so good and everything grows?
- Mitya Aleshkovsky (@Aleshru) December 23, 2016
By the way, about the ill -fated hawthorn of the questions, on the contrary, was not very long.
Noticed that there is no question from Irkutsk? There is no one to ask
- Peter Kuznetsov (@peterkuznetsov) December 23, 2016
"Mortality has decreased. In general, we have a positive dynamics" Running line: pic.twitter.com/qgowp6bigg
- tape (@oldlentach) December 23, 2016
But very soon Igor Sechin arose in the conversation - they will often remember him at the conference.
Putin: The budget deficit this year will be acceptable for me and my friends
- Nikolai Levshits (@nlevshits) December 23, 2016
Putin: “Recently, the incomes of the population have fallen”. But some representatives - say, Igor Ivanovich Sechin - things are going well!
- EchaI news (@_u_r_i_c) December 23, 2016
#Putin says that the money needs to be mastered effectively. And we, in general, see how individuals do this.
- Valery Rashkin (@rashkinv) December 23, 2016
Almost all the time, the game went into one gate. Putin more or less habitually evaded a few questions that could be called sharp.
- Do you follow the investigation of the murder of Nemtsov? - Look at the brutal murder of our ambassador in Turkey. Until now, not everything is clear about Manevich.
- PERZIAN ROISIS (@Kermlinrussia) December 23, 2016
Putin carefully monitors that the killers of Nemtsov never find
- Fields behind the hill (@lndcalling) December 23, 2016
Asshole "is possible but inappropriate." He also moves away from certainty, this is tactics, and not just the #Containment style
- GLEB PAVLOVSKY (@Glebpavlovsky) December 23, 2016
An unusually boring press conference, it is impossible. I am already sitting and yawning, now I’ll quit watching him.
And he will disappear from the information picture of the day. Accept it somehow, an ultimatum for five minutes. Throw a glass into it, for example. Or something like that.
One of the most difficult questions was by no means asked journalists!
Meanwhile, I have a family drama. The son does not believe that I am not in Vnukovo. pic.twitter.com/56zdiytep0
- Maria Baronova (@ponny1) December 23, 2016
And the observers almost completely switched to look at the hall.
In the hall there is a man with a poster of "daggers, officers still need to be returned."
- iVan davydov (@ivan_f_davydov) December 23, 2016
I don’t understand how you can ignore such a question?! pic.twitter.com/ckpw1baenv
- IVAN ZHDANOV (@ioannzh) December 23, 2016
Journalists at the microphone, apparently, fought for the right to ask the most boring issue of the day.
Quickly tired of prepared questions
- Maglov (@maglov) December 23, 2016
More than an hour and not a single question on the merits. All Russian regional journalism are philologists who were not taken to teach in schools
- Stalingulag (@stalingulag) December 23, 2016
Although their colleagues were in no hurry to write something from Putin's answers.
He looked at the main pages of several regional publications - Kirov region, Novosib, Yakutsk - no Putin.
- Alexey Kovalev (@alexey__kovalev) December 23, 2016
In Facebook, the Snobov race unfolded.
Real freedom is not when you forget the middle name at the tyrant, when you stop watching Putin, online, read online, joke about it.
It’s good that there is a Russian figure skating championship: this broadcast from Chelyabinsk is much more interesting than that one, about which everyone is writing
I sincerely sympathize with those who are forced (such) to watch the Putin's “answers without questions”, and even retell their media readers.
But I sincerely do not understand those who watch this meaningless action of their own free will.
What a blessing to watch is all from the side.
I read several comments about that
"How great is that I look from the outside"
"What a good luck that I do not need to do this
Phantom pains they are like
A journalist from Crimea asked the question of what to call the Kerch bridge correctly. Oddly enough, they returned to this topic and later.
I want to yell Albats in the voice of both journalists who asked incredible importance the question about the name of the bridge: out of the profession!
- Kristina Podment (@krispotupchik) December 23, 2016
Maybe once again ask what to call the Kerch bridge? This is the issue number-1 for the state.
- Ilias Mercury⚖ (@imerkouri) December 23, 2016
- Regarding the name of the Crimean bridge, I already said, you can hold a referendum there ... I am directly representing a "Kerch bridge or fascists?"
- Nuclear dancing (@polinanem) December 23, 2016
Putin proposed a referendum on the name of the bridge in the Crimemost of the hopelessness of the high value of the prohibition of the Slovarost of the Poor Boyastic Bridge
- Crimean (@crimea_john) December 23, 2016
Regarding something useful, you can’t hold a referendum - how many #the Communist Party tried to have a housing and communal services and education. And according to the name of the bridge - please.
- Valery Rashkin (@rashkinv) December 23, 2016
There were also the notorious “sharp questions” - they were tried to ask Alexei Solomin from Echo of Moscow and Ekaterina Vinokurova.
I think that Ekaterina Vinokurova @k_vinokurova asked today the best questions for #Prevention . Especially about Sechin and a "creeping coup"
- Vadim Sukhodolsky (@sukhodolsky) December 23, 2016
Katya Vinokurova well done. The right question about the teacher and the sentence for repost.
- Konstantin Dobrynin (@k_dobrinin) December 23, 2016
I don’t understand why Vinokurova every year instead of a normal question sculpts everything that was sore, into a crazy pile-mala. Sorry
- Gantenbine (@A3AP) December 23, 2016
Vinokurova to the king: "You are good, and your boyars are bad!" Well, finally !!
- Lá Drámhaíla (@ladramhaiola) December 23, 2016
What kind of question was Vinokurova’s question that no one understood anything?
- ruzana (@ruzayan) December 23, 2016
Great rap Vinokurova, high -quality Floo and Punchila masterfully, it’s a pity that not under the bit, at the end of the performance there was very lack of the phrase "Round!"
- I'm wildly sorry (@traktor_bang) December 23, 2016
Vinokurova finally gave the word, now it is her press conference, not Putin
- Lena dmitrova (@teasama) December 23, 2016
Journalist Putin asked a sharp question to President Ekaterina Vinokurova.
-Historian Alcoholic (@alcohistory) December 23, 2016
I do not like Vinokurov; What she does (the publication of muddy plums from AP is not clear whose interests) is not journalism at all. And the tone of her question, and her all this is a submission, and "the king is good - the boyars are bad" - this is all just terrible.
But.
However, she is absolutely right, and she did everything correctly, she must admit.
Because Putin’s annual press is an absolutely meaningless ritual. And the only thing that gives him some meaning is that you can come, ask a question about the fate of a particular person, and this give some chance to facilitate the fate of this particular person.
It is good that by 2016, finally, everyone understood this-even Katya Vinokurova-and no one is trying to ask Putin questions about everything good and about everything bad. And they are simply trying to save specific people - Sentsov, Sokolova, Chudvets.
Alexei Solomin from Echo made a typical mistake: he asked Putin several questions at once, including about the Murder of Nemtsov. Putin remembered about after Karlov, about Starovoitova, about Madtsov - not a word about Nemtsov. It is not supposed to ask.
Show from Putin’s press conference is so-so. Even Vinokurov with Vyatka kvass is not saved. I want to fall asleep from the 10th minute.
- Publito (@frelemons) December 23, 2016
Well, I honestly turned on at noon. I listened. Milk yield. He fell asleep. Woke up - Western partners. Now I get on the train Peter, and he still says.
Journalists, how is it, huh? Where is the question of Dadin? Where is the question at least about hawthorn? Instead, a spiritualistic session with Evgeny Primakov. Only Ekaterina Vinokurova da Echo support the profession.
The question about the hawthorn was born only at the fourth hour of the meeting, but Putin did not answer him for a long time, adding that the problem of "alcoholization" is in other countries.
"Alcoholization is a problem. But it is no more than in Northern Europe" is clear. Nemtsov was killed. So they also kill them. Boar? And with them!
- Revolutionary thoughts (@vvp2_0) December 23, 2016
Putin: "Now about alcoholization. Yes, it is still insufficient."
- Lá Drámhaíla (@ladramhaiola) December 23, 2016
The conversation revived a little at the very end, when the microphone took turns at the journalists of RBC and Vedomosti and again - where without him, Igor Sechin and his courts with the media were remembered.
Putin said that he is often complained of “terror” from journalists.
"Journalistic terror" is Putin's fresh neologism. It will quote with a grin during detention and when refusing to admit the press somewhere.
- Andrey Borodulin (@_Borodulin) December 23, 2016
I hope Sechin will sue the organizers of today's press conference
- Smirnov (@ssmirnov) December 23, 2016
Commentators note a specific selection of publications that have received the word.
The newspaper "For the sovereignty of Russia" from Ufa. What a shame!
The newspaper "Young Leninets", the newspaper "For the Sovereignty of Russia" - who was there at all? ..)
So far, the main result of Putin’s communication with the press: for the first time gave the floor to so many representatives of the patriotic media. "For sovereignty!" (NOD), RIA "Ivan Tea", on the eve of.ru. I like to read all of them - about the bloody waltzman, an electronic concentration camp, juvenilers, Rothschilds, reptilians, globalists.
Good time.
Of course, there are those who are always fine.
What do you think, Merkel, Obama, Poroshenko watch Putin live or their advisers look and report to them every hour the main thing? It seems to me that Poroshenko is secretly looking live. Merkel looks at agencies. And Obama is sleeping and in the morning he finds out that Putin called him a splitting American nation.
The most attentive press conference of Putin is now watching Ukrainians and Obama.
I think so (c)
But in general, the final reaction is not much different from the premium.
Thoroughly, streamlined, inexpressibly boring
The next press conference of Putin, the press will come in Canary Triko-with rock bands, mims, trained parrots. Will be fun and scary
To demonstrate “democracy”, “dynamic modern style”, “competence”-these are the goals and objectives that the Kremlin set, after the Putin mega-press conference. However, in reality, the picture turned out to be completely different. The omnipotent and omnipotent ruler, on the live broadcasts, the most resolving issues (to hell know how many time zones) the country, comforting and "mourning" the population that falls to its feet is in its pure form an Asia -monarchic archaic.
The results of Putin’s press conference in 2016: I don't know
Putin decided to refute his press conference to the old Chekist thesis that "a talker is a find for a spy."
No find. No novelty. One old chewing gum and boasting.
Literally there is nothing to report to the center.
I have a feeling that the genre of "annual press conference" is exhausted. It is already boring to everyone, and the main character is not least. A mixture of Bibisi and Nodovsky freaks, diluted by the sophisticated Holuyaz Goskanals and a sluggish front of business media.
Free Petya, plant Vasya, tighten, intervene, seize, remove, return children's magazines to the libraries, and in response - we will be more tolerant, nothing can be banned in the world, and children's content must be created on new media, and Clinton - the sheep with democrats - rams themselves are to blame.
Perception is spreading, from time to time acquires a shade characteristic of the players of the absurdists. For Putin, whose picture and agenda are always very clear, intelligible and structured - this is unusual and rather harmful.
For the BBC - "Valdai Club", for public human rights and regional lobbying - ONF, Nodovski Fricice does not need anything at all, the Chinese - press conferences in the State University. Regionals - local short events during trips to regions, formal indicators of the economy - appeal to the Federal Assembly.
Perhaps, when it all just began when the methods and channels of communication were not enough - the genre "who was the same in what was the same. Today - is redundant, uncomfortable, leaves bewilderment from the fact that in essence you have already heard all this many times, and the dive with "for Ufa sovereignty" to hear and do not want to.
Well, you ask him questions and expect answers from him. Do you think he will tell you what he will do next? And what, he spoke in advance about the Crimea and the Donbass, or about Syria, and at least about anything significant? To what question did he ever answer directly and in fact? Probably promised to fight corruption and support a small business? He always promises this.
I believe that the space of the maneuver in this person is narrowed. He has no plans, no positions, no plans, no strategist. Only "Chuyka", which more often fails. And the hope of everyone to leave (before it boastfully called "replay"). And the oil will bounce right in the forehead, and Trump will give him all the Eurasia, and the economy will rise from the “crisis”, you just need to wait, play with biceps, and most importantly - nothing to change anything at all, so as not to seem weak.
Well, what are the questions here?
Our life depends on him less and less, in fact.
-
Ivan Belyaev
Social Networks Editor Radio Liberty