
In Tver, the FSB completed the investigation in the case of a citizen of Russia, the ethnic Azerbaijani Nurlan Gadzhiev, who is charged with the assistance of the Islamic State for transferring 2 thousand rubles to Turkey in 2014. This was reported by Radio Liberty with reference to lawyer Elena Romanov, who recently entered the case instead of a defender for their intended purpose.
On Tuesday, the 25-year-old Gadzhiev was awarded the indictment in the case. Part 1 of Article 205.1 of the Criminal Code (financing of terrorism) Tveritein threatens from 5 to 10 years in the colony. He is under the subscription about the loss.
Gadzhiev himself told the radio stations that in 2014 he made friends with one young man and began to communicate with him on VKontakte. Soon he saw that a friend was publishing a photo from Istanbul. When asked by Gadzhiev, a comrade replied that he had moved to Turkey with his wife and child and works as a driver.
In the middle of the same year, a rumor was held in the Azerbaijani diaspora that Gadzhiev’s friend was fighting in Syria. The Tverite contacted a friend on the social network to clarify the information, and received an affirmative answer. “He said that from time to time it happens in Syria in the combat zone, and began to poke my ideology for me,” Gadzhiev explained.
The Tverite added that he tried to convince his comrade to return to Russia. Among other things, Gadzhiev noticed that he did not understand "how to kill people, especially Muslims."
After some time, the comrade told Gadzhiev that he was ill with cancer and lies in the hospital where he had surgery. The Tverite invited a friend to help with money and transferred him to his wife to a Sberbank card 2 thousand rubles. Subsequently, Gajiev says, he did not contact his friend.
Meanwhile, in March 2015, the head of the Azerbaijani community of Tver, whose name was not specified in the publication, told Gadzhiev that he was in the FSB list, and advised the police voluntarily. The young man did so. They took explanations from him and released.
However, eight months later, the security forces went to Gadzhiev and “offered cooperation”, promising a condition and fine for this. Otherwise, they threatened that they would achieve a real term for the Tverite. Gadzhiev turned to the head of the community. He said that a friend of the FSB officer promised him not to send a young man before the trial in a pre -trial detention center if he writes a confession and would not hire a lawyer by agreement. After that, Gadzhiev appeared to the police and signed the papers, which were already prepared in advance.
However, he later studied the Criminal Code and realized that the security forces had deceived him. Clause "A.1" of part 1 of Article 73 of the Code (conditional conviction) directly eliminates the possibility of a conditional term for the charges of an imputed. As we might assume, after that the Tverite turned to Romanova.
According to the lawyer, the case was opened in March 2016. At the same time, the examination conducted by order of the investigation did not manage to establish what 2 thousand rubles sent by Gadzhiev to Turkey were spent on. At the same time, Romanova added, another study performed by graduate students of the Tver University, as if the defendant shared the ideas of IG, because he allegedly called only the murders of Muslims (although Gadzhiev says that he spoke of "people, especially Muslims").
Now the accused is waiting for the appointment of a court session. The case, as we can assume, was transferred to the Moscow District Military Court.
Earlier in the Lipetsk region, the namesake of the Tverite, a 42 -year -old merchant of apples, Gaja Gadzhiev , an ethnic Talysh, who is also a citizen of Russia, was convicted in a similar case. According to the same part 1 of Article 205.1 of the Criminal Code, he received five years in a colony with a fine of 200 thousand rubles for transferring money to his brother to Turkey, and after his brother’s death - his family members in Syria. It was announced that in fact, Gadzhiev transferred money to the Junda Esh-Sham group. On September 13, the Supreme Court confirmed the verdict to the merchant.