
At the end of December, I was summoned to a conversation in the Center for Combating Extremism, where police officers offered me as the co -chair of the regional branch of Parnassus “Cooperation”, in my understanding “Consumest”. I refused such a proposal, as a result of which I was delivered to the prosecutor’s office, where I was awarded a resolution under Part 1 of Art. 20.3 Administrative Code (demonstration of Nazi symbols). According to the police from 2010 to 2104, on my VKontakte page several pictures were posted with women in military uniforms around the world, including girls in the form of the German army of 1933-1945.
During the trial, I received 7 days of arrest, then there was an appeal to the regional court of the Chelyabinsk region, which left the sentence unchanged.
I would like to thank everyone who illuminated this process and brought me gearboxes that allowed me to relatively positively celebrate the New Year in the cell.
I would especially like to thank my lawyer Lepokhin Andrei Gennadievich, who, in fact, ruined the accusation, citing a number of violations:
The pictures were removed by me in the prosecutor's office in the Tractorozavodsky district, which by law obliges to consider the case only in this area, but the case was considered by the “judge” Sutyan, who now regularly judges “political” in the Soviet district.
Even if we consider this offense “lasting”, the police began the development of this case back in May, and 3 months allotted for a statute of limitations have long been expired by December.
The Center “E” conducted an investigation into an administrative case under the criminal law on “operational-search measures”. Accordingly, the materials collected in violation of the law could not serve as evidence, but the “judge” safely dismissed such “trifles”. I was also not provided with a lawyer and it is forbidden to remove a photocopy from the case file.
According to the law, the appeal should have been considered at 24 hours, but the regional court has expired all the temporary framework allotted by law.
These are only the main violations identified by the lawyer, without taking into account subjective aspects of the absence of the goal of “propaganda” and so on and so-and-coche.
I am sure that if not for the activity of the lawyer, I would have been given to the maximum, all 15 days, and I would still serve my term.
And, if you allow you, another small stroke at the end of the picture. Upon arrival in the temporary detention center, I witnessed the conversation of the “escort” from the ED center with the on -duty officers, during which the insulator workers asked: “Why for so long, you still wanted to deliver it in the morning?” The fact is that the court was appointed in the morning, but the lawyer achieved the transfer of the consideration of the case for the evening, so that there was time to get acquainted with the material, but the insulator was in advance of my arrival.
Thanks again to all friends and caring, with the holiday, we will win together.